FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2018759669> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2018759669 endingPage "121" @default.
• W2018759669 startingPage "115" @default.
• W2018759669 abstract "Study Design Cross-sectional. Objectives To (1) determine the association between pain severity and pain drawing area for men and women; (2) determine if sex differences exist in pain severity or pain drawing area; (3) determine the relative influence of pain severity, anatomical location of pain, personality, and psychological coping factors on pain drawing area for men and women. Background Pain drawings have been postulated to assist in clinical decision making regarding classification and treatment of musculoskeletal pain. Prior studies have been ambiguous on this topic, possibly because they have not considered if sex differences exist for pain drawing area. Methods and Measures One hundred twenty-six subjects referred to a multidisciplinary chronic pain clinic with chronic musculoskeletal pain were included in this study. Subjects completed a pain drawing, the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI), the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ), and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-2). Pearson correlations investigated the associations of pain severity and pain drawing area, independent t tests investigated sex differences in pain severity and pain drawing area, and multiple regression investigated factors that influenced pain drawing area. Results Pain severity was positively correlated with pain drawing area for men (r = 0.38, P = .003) and women (r = 0.23, P = .052), accounting for approximately 14% and 5% of the total variance, respectively. There was no significant sex difference in pain severity ratings, but women reported a significantly larger area of symptoms on the pain drawings (effect size, 0.61; P = .002). The sex difference in pain drawing area was consistent across different anatomical locations of pain. In women, the final regression model accounted for 39% (P<.001) of the variance in pain drawing area, with anatomical location of pain (β = .42, P<.001) and hypochondriasis (β = .31, P = .005) as the only unique predictors in the final model. In men, the regression model accounted for 27% (P = .003) of the variance in pain drawing area, with pain severity (β = .32, P = .021) and a coping style of ignoring pain (β = −.32, P = .018) as the only unique predictors in the final model. Conclusions Women had larger pain drawing area and this area was significantly associated with anatomical location of pain and hypochondriasis. Men had smaller pain drawing area and this area was associated with pain severity and a coping style of ignoring pain. These findings suggest that clinicians interpreting pain diagram area should consider the sex of the individual. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2007;37(3):115–121. doi:1.2519/jospt.2007.2399" @default.
• W2018759669 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2018759669 creator A5009665125 @default.
• W2018759669 creator A5051423560 @default.
• W2018759669 creator A5058688355 @default.
• W2018759669 creator A5077344604 @default.
• W2018759669 date "2007-03-01" @default.
• W2018759669 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W2018759669 title "Sex Differences in Pain Drawing Area for Individuals With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain" @default.
• W2018759669 cites W106225336 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W1606783717 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W1964130439 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W1964741232 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W1968871348 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W1971435912 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W1978266854 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W1979283587 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W1987751838 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W1988900574 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W1998551526 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2003228014 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2004733870 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2013273855 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2017095127 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2029083761 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2029437839 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2034839624 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2035616471 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2041690643 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2042201578 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2042236628 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2043709226 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2051678477 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2052896927 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2062100046 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2063049860 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2064731181 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2068195764 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2082376468 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2088804799 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2089848860 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2090918502 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2092446509 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2098889073 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2115957253 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2119952144 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2127059751 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2128923215 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2135433454 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2138599247 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2140422243 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2147777761 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2151479308 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2157131240 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2159784367 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2161694445 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2169254339 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2291778184 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2327184349 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W2332290675 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W4237755043 @default.
• W2018759669 cites W49991904 @default.
• W2018759669 doi "https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2007.2399" @default.
• W2018759669 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17416126" @default.
• W2018759669 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2018759669 type Work @default.
• W2018759669 sameAs 2018759669 @default.
• W2018759669 citedByCount "17" @default.
• W2018759669 countsByYear W20187596692012 @default.
• W2018759669 countsByYear W20187596692014 @default.
• W2018759669 countsByYear W20187596692015 @default.
• W2018759669 countsByYear W20187596692016 @default.
• W2018759669 countsByYear W20187596692017 @default.
• W2018759669 countsByYear W20187596692018 @default.
• W2018759669 countsByYear W20187596692019 @default.
• W2018759669 countsByYear W20187596692020 @default.
• W2018759669 countsByYear W20187596692022 @default.
• W2018759669 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2018759669 hasAuthorship W2018759669A5009665125 @default.
• W2018759669 hasAuthorship W2018759669A5051423560 @default.
• W2018759669 hasAuthorship W2018759669A5058688355 @default.
• W2018759669 hasAuthorship W2018759669A5077344604 @default.
• W2018759669 hasBestOaLocation W20187596691 @default.
• W2018759669 hasConcept C112143881 @default.
• W2018759669 hasConcept C142052008 @default.
• W2018759669 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2018759669 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2018759669 hasConcept C166523933 @default.
• W2018759669 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2018759669 hasConcept C187288502 @default.
• W2018759669 hasConcept C2780052408 @default.
• W2018759669 hasConcept C2781118164 @default.
• W2018759669 hasConcept C2993471631 @default.
• W2018759669 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2018759669 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2018759669 hasConcept C73282008 @default.
• W2018759669 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2018759669 hasConceptScore W2018759669C112143881 @default.

• next