FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2018921872> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2018921872 endingPage "189" @default.
• W2018921872 startingPage "189" @default.
• W2018921872 abstract "The use of ultraviolet (UV) signals for communication tasks is widespread in vertebrates. For instance, there is a UV component to mate choice in several species. Nevertheless, it remains unclear how the signal value of the UV wave band compares to that of other regions of the animal's visible spectrum. We investigated the relative importance of UV signals compared with signals of longer wavelengths in the threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus), a species using UV wavelengths in female and male mate choice as well as in shoaling behavior. In a choice experiment, female sticklebacks were simultaneously presented with four male visual appearances manipulated by optical filters. Each male lacked one wavelength range of the stickleback's visible spectrum corresponding to the spectral sensitivities of the four cone types. The resulting male appearances thus had no UV (UV-), no short-wave (SW-), no medium-wave (MW-) or no long-wave (LW-) body reflectance. Males without UV wavelengths and long wavelengths (red) were least preferred. In contrast, the removal of medium and most notably short wavelengths left male attractiveness to females rather unaffected. Using color metrics, the effects of the four optical filters on stickleback perception of three male body regions were illustrated as quantal catches calculated for the four single cones. The removal of UV light (UV-) considerably reduced visual attractiveness of courting males to female three-spined sticklebacks particularly in comparison to the removal of short-wave light (SW-). We thus report first experimental evidence that the UV wave band clearly outranks at least one other part of an animal's visible spectrum (SW-) in the context of communication. In addition, females were also less attracted to males presented without long wavelengths (LW-) which supports the traditionally considered strong influence of the red color component on stickleback mate choice. Overall, the removal of medium wavelengths (MW-) and especially short (SW-) left male attractiveness for females rather unaffected. Our work suggests that, in addition to long wavelengths (red), the UV wave band contains important information for visual mate choice in sticklebacks. Hence, the previously suggested exclusive role of the characteristic red nuptial coloration in visual interactions between reproductively active stickleback conspecifics may be overestimated with UV wavelengths playing a more important role than previously suggested." @default.
• W2018921872 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2018921872 creator A5054510089 @default.
• W2018921872 creator A5058821531 @default.
• W2018921872 date "2008-01-01" @default.
• W2018921872 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2018921872 title "Color signaling in conspicuous red sticklebacks: do ultraviolet signals surpass others?" @default.
• W2018921872 cites W1507653370 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W1548604282 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W1650484102 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W1973051138 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W1974999642 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W1981405201 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W1998848930 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W2009751817 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W2023112640 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W2028266390 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W2028666877 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W2050822122 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W2051305256 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W2070383899 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W2076193569 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W2083883399 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W2091045502 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W2092084985 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W2094987252 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W2102033432 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W2111378195 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W2111891075 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W2119564425 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W2121949771 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W2126401204 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W2133837408 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W2134316659 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W2134425408 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W2135200304 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W2136483573 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W2145541960 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W2149912119 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W2151899197 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W2153468745 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W2158469331 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W2170057146 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W2331991505 @default.
• W2018921872 cites W29879905 @default.
• W2018921872 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-189" @default.
• W2018921872 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/2453139" @default.
• W2018921872 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18593461" @default.
• W2018921872 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2018921872 type Work @default.
• W2018921872 sameAs 2018921872 @default.
• W2018921872 citedByCount "48" @default.
• W2018921872 countsByYear W20189218722012 @default.
• W2018921872 countsByYear W20189218722013 @default.
• W2018921872 countsByYear W20189218722014 @default.
• W2018921872 countsByYear W20189218722015 @default.
• W2018921872 countsByYear W20189218722016 @default.
• W2018921872 countsByYear W20189218722017 @default.
• W2018921872 countsByYear W20189218722018 @default.
• W2018921872 countsByYear W20189218722019 @default.
• W2018921872 countsByYear W20189218722020 @default.
• W2018921872 countsByYear W20189218722021 @default.
• W2018921872 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2018921872 hasAuthorship W2018921872A5054510089 @default.
• W2018921872 hasAuthorship W2018921872A5058821531 @default.
• W2018921872 hasBestOaLocation W20189218721 @default.
• W2018921872 hasConcept C11171543 @default.
• W2018921872 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2018921872 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2018921872 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2018921872 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2018921872 hasConcept C206622957 @default.
• W2018921872 hasConcept C2776798109 @default.
• W2018921872 hasConcept C2778938320 @default.
• W2018921872 hasConcept C2780558290 @default.
• W2018921872 hasConcept C2909208804 @default.
• W2018921872 hasConcept C2987116853 @default.
• W2018921872 hasConcept C31173074 @default.
• W2018921872 hasConcept C49040817 @default.
• W2018921872 hasConcept C505870484 @default.
• W2018921872 hasConcept C514575182 @default.
• W2018921872 hasConcept C54779947 @default.
• W2018921872 hasConcept C6260449 @default.
• W2018921872 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2018921872 hasConcept C90856448 @default.
• W2018921872 hasConceptScore W2018921872C11171543 @default.
• W2018921872 hasConceptScore W2018921872C120665830 @default.
• W2018921872 hasConceptScore W2018921872C121332964 @default.
• W2018921872 hasConceptScore W2018921872C15744967 @default.
• W2018921872 hasConceptScore W2018921872C18903297 @default.
• W2018921872 hasConceptScore W2018921872C206622957 @default.
• W2018921872 hasConceptScore W2018921872C2776798109 @default.
• W2018921872 hasConceptScore W2018921872C2778938320 @default.
• W2018921872 hasConceptScore W2018921872C2780558290 @default.
• W2018921872 hasConceptScore W2018921872C2909208804 @default.
• W2018921872 hasConceptScore W2018921872C2987116853 @default.
• W2018921872 hasConceptScore W2018921872C31173074 @default.
• W2018921872 hasConceptScore W2018921872C49040817 @default.

• next