FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2019145087> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2019145087 endingPage "89" @default.
• W2019145087 startingPage "89" @default.
• W2019145087 abstract "Since the appearance of the WHO compliance–adherence report1,2 we have had confirmed what many patients and health professionals have known for a long time, that many patients simply do not follow health professionals’ advice – they vary that advice to suit their needs. Also, health professionals often do not follow evidence-based guidelines when providing treatment and care to patients. We have tended to cope with these phenomena by labeling patients as ‘noncompliant’, or, worse, and have denied them treatment access in some settings or imposed treatment against their will. Mental health settings provide a stark focused lens on this phenomenon, but it likely pervades many other areas of health care.In a recent attempt to unpack the discourse around concordance, compliance, preference, and adherence, Fraser3 argued for the term ‘concordance’, by which the health professional and patient strive for a more equal relationship in deciding goals for treatment and enforced treatment is avoided. He concluded that, ‘the bottom line is that it doesn’t matter what you call it as long as the patient takes the correct medication at the correct time and at the correct dose’ (p. 96). Holding that this is true, he attaches the rider that cognitive and social problems within the patient affect their capacity to achieve this. Yet, I believe that this approach continues to miss some very important and fundamental value shifts that need to occur, if truly patient-centered care is to be achieved by health professionals. It also places the lived experience and social determinants surrounding the patient as second to health professional expertise based purely on ‘the science’. It runs the risk of continuing to be understood as compliance to what the health professional says should happen, rather than genuine concordant processes that fully acknowledge the patient’s role in decision-making about treatments.We would like to believe that health professional expertise and decisions are always based on rigorous science. We have certainly come a long way in the past 100 years of research and practice and we know much more about causes of disease and their effective treatment. But we still have much to understand about the cycle and path of illness, particularly the unique ways by which it displays itself in each individual and how they respond and make sense of the experience as part of what we all do to strive to make sense of our world. Cancer care is one such area where, arguably, many unknown variables are at play. Psychotic illness such as paranoid schizophrenia is another example where the person is ‘working hard’ to make sense of what is occurring, not passively experiencing it, albeit doing so with a range of cognitive processes that may lead them to false conclusions about that experience.So, concluding statements like Fraser’s seem to fall short somehow. All will not necessarily be well by taking the correct medication at the correct time and at the correct dose. Illness and lived responses to it involve and require more than this. I believe that a more preferable bottom line is that whatever treatment is given to the patient by the health professional, it should suit the patient’s needs and actually ameliorate or cure the health condition for which the patient has come to seek help, while minimizing other unwanted effects, as experienced and tolerated by the patient. They must live with their health conditions, after all." @default.
• W2019145087 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2019145087 creator A5067443785 @default.
• W2019145087 date "2011-02-01" @default.
• W2019145087 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W2019145087 title "Compliance, concordance, and patient-centered care" @default.
• W2019145087 cites W2053780376 @default.
• W2019145087 cites W2073967349 @default.
• W2019145087 doi "https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s17822" @default.
• W2019145087 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3058606" @default.
• W2019145087 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21423593" @default.
• W2019145087 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2019145087 type Work @default.
• W2019145087 sameAs 2019145087 @default.
• W2019145087 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2019145087 countsByYear W20191450872015 @default.
• W2019145087 countsByYear W20191450872017 @default.
• W2019145087 countsByYear W20191450872022 @default.
• W2019145087 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2019145087 hasAuthorship W2019145087A5067443785 @default.
• W2019145087 hasBestOaLocation W20191450871 @default.
• W2019145087 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2019145087 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2019145087 hasConcept C160798450 @default.
• W2019145087 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W2019145087 hasConcept C2781460075 @default.
• W2019145087 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2019145087 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2019145087 hasConcept C98274493 @default.
• W2019145087 hasConceptScore W2019145087C126322002 @default.
• W2019145087 hasConceptScore W2019145087C15744967 @default.
• W2019145087 hasConceptScore W2019145087C160798450 @default.
• W2019145087 hasConceptScore W2019145087C177713679 @default.
• W2019145087 hasConceptScore W2019145087C2781460075 @default.
• W2019145087 hasConceptScore W2019145087C71924100 @default.
• W2019145087 hasConceptScore W2019145087C77805123 @default.
• W2019145087 hasConceptScore W2019145087C98274493 @default.
• W2019145087 hasLocation W20191450871 @default.
• W2019145087 hasLocation W20191450872 @default.
• W2019145087 hasLocation W20191450873 @default.
• W2019145087 hasLocation W20191450874 @default.
• W2019145087 hasLocation W20191450875 @default.
• W2019145087 hasOpenAccess W2019145087 @default.
• W2019145087 hasPrimaryLocation W20191450871 @default.
• W2019145087 hasRelatedWork W2003664410 @default.
• W2019145087 hasRelatedWork W2027899659 @default.
• W2019145087 hasRelatedWork W2052690733 @default.
• W2019145087 hasRelatedWork W2078741319 @default.
• W2019145087 hasRelatedWork W2101355179 @default.
• W2019145087 hasRelatedWork W2358797338 @default.
• W2019145087 hasRelatedWork W3118819463 @default.
• W2019145087 hasRelatedWork W3172367548 @default.
• W2019145087 hasRelatedWork W4315784269 @default.
• W2019145087 hasRelatedWork W2182088620 @default.
• W2019145087 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2019145087 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2019145087 magId "2019145087" @default.
• W2019145087 workType "article" @default.