FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2019454754> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2019454754 endingPage "401" @default.
• W2019454754 startingPage "385" @default.
• W2019454754 abstract "Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and ManagementVol. 06, No. 03, pp. 385-401 (2004) No AccessREVIEW OF ECOLOGICAL INPUT IN PRELIMINARY EIAS FOR COASTAL RESORT DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN MALAYSIALEONG-WAN VUN, ABDUL LATIFF, and MOHD NORDINLEONG-WAN VUNSchool of Science & Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, 88502 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia Search for more papers by this author , ABDUL LATIFFFaculty of Science & Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia Search for more papers by this author , and MOHD NORDINEnvironmental Management & Research Association, Malaysia Search for more papers by this author https://doi.org/10.1142/S146433320400178XCited by:3 PreviousNext AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsRecommend to Library ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail AbstractIn Malaysia, environmental impact assessment (EIA) has been mandatory since 1988 as a proactive tool in environmental management for 19 prescribed activities. Since ecological information is an important component in EIA, this study examined the quality of ecological input in 41 preliminary EIAs for coastal resort development. Twelve criteria relating to ecological data, impact prediction, evaluation of impact significance, mitigating measures, residual impacts, monitoring, communication of the report and consultants were reviewed. Results revealed that only 27 percent of the EIAs were found to be satisfactory, whereas the others were at borderline or poor. In describing the existing environment, the majority of the reports made no mention of the survey methods, some of the data included were found to be not site-specific and up-to-date, and the sources of the secondary data presented in these reports were mostly not quoted. There was a tendency to survey terrestrial habitats more than aquatic, and higher plants are surveyed more than animals. Most of the reports also failed to mention the species status although comprehensive lists of species were present. They also failed to quantify the species present in the impacted areas which could lead to inadequate ecological impact prediction. The study also showed that, though all the reports contained a section on ecology, not all the EIA consultants involved in preparing these reports comprised of a multidisciplinary team that has an ecologist/biologist or environmental scientist.Keywords:Ecological inputecological impact assessmentEIA References S. F. Atkinsonet al., Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 18(4), 271 (2000), DOI: 10.3152/147154600781767349. Crossref, Google ScholarJ. Bailey, V. Hobbs and A. Saunders, Journal of Environmental Management 34, 1 (1992), DOI: 10.1016/S0301-4797(05)80106-9. Crossref, Google ScholarG. E. Beanlands and P. N. Duinker, Journal of Environmental Management 18, 267 (1984). Google Scholar A. Beeby , Applying Ecology ( Chapman & Hall , London , 1993 ) . Google ScholarJ. Boyle, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 18(2), 95 (1998), DOI: 10.1016/S0195-9255(97)00082-6. Crossref, Google Scholar R. A. Carpenter and J. E. Maragos , How to Assess Environmental Impacts on Tropical Islands and Coastal Areas ( Environmental & Policy Institute , Hawaii , 1989 ) . Google Scholar R. F. Dasmann , J. P. Milton and P. H. Freeman , Ecological Principles for Economic Development ( John Wiley & Sons , United Kingdom , 1973 ) . Google Scholar Department of Environment , A Handbook for Environmental Impact Assessment Guidelines ( Ministry of Science, Technology and the Environment , Malaysia , 1987 ) . Google Scholar Department of Environment , EIA Guidelines for Coastal Resort Development Projects ( Ministry of Science, Technology and the Environment , Malaysia , 1994 ) . Google Scholar Department of Environment , A Handbook for Environmental Impact Assessment Guidelines , 2nd edn. ( Ministry of Science, Technology and the Environment , Malaysia , 1995 ) . Google Scholar Department of Environment , Environmental Quality Report 1997 ( Ministry of Science, Technology and the Environment , Malaysia , 1997 ) . Google ScholarB. Dipper, C. Jones and C. Wood, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 41(6), 731 (1998), DOI: 10.1080/09640569811399. Crossref, Google ScholarT. J. Elkin and P. G. R. Smith, Journal of environmental management 26(1), 71 (1988). Google ScholarJ. Glassonet al., Journal of Environmental Management 40(4), 451 (1997). Google ScholarS. M. Hirst, Journal of Environmental Management 18, 189 (1984). Google Scholar S. M. Hirst , Journal of Environmental Management 18 , 204 . Google ScholarA. Latiff and A. H. Zakri, Biodiversity Conservation in ASEAN: Emerging Issues and Regional Needs, eds. Ghazally Ismail and Murtedza Mohamed (ASEAN Academic Press, London, 1998) pp. 138–164. Google ScholarD. P. Lawrence, Project appraisal 12(4), 219 (1997). Crossref, Google Scholar N. Lee and R. Colley , Occasional Paper 24: Reviewing the Quality of Environmental Statements ( EIA Centre, University of Manchester , Manchester , 1990 ) . Google ScholarN. Lee and R. Dancey, Project Appraisal 8(1), 31 (1993). Crossref, Google ScholarA. Maddock and M. A. Du Plessis, Biodiversity and Conservation 8, 603 (1999), DOI: 10.1023/A:1008819015819. Crossref, Google Scholar P. Morris , Methods of Environmental Impact Assessment , eds. P. Morris and R. Therivel ( UCL Press , London , 1995 ) . Google Scholar MOSTE , Country Study on Biological Diversity: Assessment of Biological Diversity in Malaysia ( Ministry of Science, Technology and the Environment , Malaysia , 1997 ) . Google ScholarW. A. Ross, Journal of Environmental Management 25, 137 (1987). Google ScholarI. Spellerberg and A. Minshull, British Ecological Society Bulletin 13, 38 (1992). Google ScholarS. Thompson, J. R. Treweek and D. J. Thurling, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 40(2), 157 (1997). Crossref, Google ScholarJ. Treweek, Journal of Applied Ecology 33, 191 (1996). Crossref, Google Scholar J. Treweek , Ecological Impact Assessment ( Blackwell Science Ltd. , Oxford , 1999 ) . Google ScholarJ. Treweek and S. Thompson, Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 4, 40 (1997). Crossref, Google ScholarJ. Treweeket al., Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 36(3), 295 (1993), DOI: 10.1080/09640569308711948. Crossref, Google Scholar UN , Guidelines on Environmentally Sound Development of Coastal Tourism ( United Nations , New York , 1995 ) . Google Scholar Vun, L. W. (2002). Ecological input review and EIA for coastal resort development. PhD Thesis, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia . Google ScholarL. W. Vun and A. Latiff, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 17(2), 133 (1999), DOI: 10.3152/147154699781767846. Crossref, Google ScholarJ. Warnken and R. Buckley, Journal of Applied Ecology 35, 1 (1998), DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2664.1998.00288.x. Crossref, Google Scholar FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By 3Coastal resort development in Malaysia: A review of policy use in the pre-construction and post-construction phaseOlivia A. Lee1 Aug 2010 | Ocean & Coastal Management, Vol. 53, No. 8Ecological assessment: an initial evaluation of the ecological input in environmental impact assessment reports in BahrainHumood Naser, John Bythell and Jeremy Thomason1 Sep 2008 | Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, Vol. 26, No. 3Towards sustainable development? The evolution of environmental policy in MalaysiaA. A. Hezri and Mohd. Nordin Hasan1 Feb 2006 | Natural Resources Forum, Vol. 30, No. 1 Recommended Vol. 06, No. 03 Metrics History Received 2 October 2003 Revised 30 July 2004 Accepted 3 August 2004 KeywordsEcological inputecological impact assessmentEIAPDF download" @default.
• W2019454754 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2019454754 creator A5009696957 @default.
• W2019454754 creator A5011604165 @default.
• W2019454754 creator A5091762723 @default.
• W2019454754 date "2004-09-01" @default.
• W2019454754 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2019454754 title "REVIEW OF ECOLOGICAL INPUT IN PRELIMINARY EIAS FOR COASTAL RESORT DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN MALAYSIA" @default.
• W2019454754 cites W172718938 @default.
• W2019454754 cites W1988583502 @default.
• W2019454754 cites W2000761419 @default.
• W2019454754 cites W2007147776 @default.
• W2019454754 cites W2012318289 @default.
• W2019454754 cites W2041461808 @default.
• W2019454754 cites W2052299354 @default.
• W2019454754 cites W2056623605 @default.
• W2019454754 cites W2066291740 @default.
• W2019454754 cites W2070435481 @default.
• W2019454754 cites W2165226093 @default.
• W2019454754 cites W2172052806 @default.
• W2019454754 cites W2319827678 @default.
• W2019454754 doi "https://doi.org/10.1142/s146433320400178x" @default.
• W2019454754 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W2019454754 type Work @default.
• W2019454754 sameAs 2019454754 @default.
• W2019454754 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2019454754 countsByYear W20194547542012 @default.
• W2019454754 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2019454754 hasAuthorship W2019454754A5009696957 @default.
• W2019454754 hasAuthorship W2019454754A5011604165 @default.
• W2019454754 hasAuthorship W2019454754A5091762723 @default.
• W2019454754 hasConcept C107826830 @default.
• W2019454754 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2019454754 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2019454754 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2019454754 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2019454754 hasConcept C505870484 @default.
• W2019454754 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2019454754 hasConcept C91375879 @default.
• W2019454754 hasConceptScore W2019454754C107826830 @default.
• W2019454754 hasConceptScore W2019454754C144133560 @default.
• W2019454754 hasConceptScore W2019454754C18903297 @default.
• W2019454754 hasConceptScore W2019454754C205649164 @default.
• W2019454754 hasConceptScore W2019454754C39432304 @default.
• W2019454754 hasConceptScore W2019454754C505870484 @default.
• W2019454754 hasConceptScore W2019454754C86803240 @default.
• W2019454754 hasConceptScore W2019454754C91375879 @default.
• W2019454754 hasIssue "03" @default.
• W2019454754 hasLocation W20194547541 @default.
• W2019454754 hasOpenAccess W2019454754 @default.
• W2019454754 hasPrimaryLocation W20194547541 @default.
• W2019454754 hasRelatedWork W2316479391 @default.
• W2019454754 hasRelatedWork W2341665333 @default.
• W2019454754 hasRelatedWork W2396101645 @default.
• W2019454754 hasRelatedWork W2427451802 @default.
• W2019454754 hasRelatedWork W2587128858 @default.
• W2019454754 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2019454754 hasRelatedWork W2917849976 @default.
• W2019454754 hasRelatedWork W3175033314 @default.
• W2019454754 hasRelatedWork W4231903995 @default.
• W2019454754 hasRelatedWork W4246233833 @default.
• W2019454754 hasVolume "06" @default.
• W2019454754 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2019454754 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2019454754 magId "2019454754" @default.
• W2019454754 workType "article" @default.