FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2019468992> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2019468992 endingPage "31" @default.
• W2019468992 startingPage "1" @default.
• W2019468992 abstract "Collective Action, Opacity, and the Problem of Irrationality:Anarchism and the First of May, 1890-1892 Davide Turcato, Independent Scholar Introduction The history of anarchism is often approached as a simple and odd business. Anarchist collective action tends to be depicted as a succession of unconnected and hopeless initiatives: futile insurrectionary attempts by isolated and ill-equipped bands, such as the 1877 Benevento expedition led by Errico Malatesta and Carlo Cafiero, or spontaneous outbursts of rage by exasperated mobs in backward areas, such as was allegedly typical of Andalusian anarchism. In all cases, available historical evidence seems to leave little doubt about the anarchists' lack of preparation and organization, in stark contrast with their high-sounding proclaimed ends. Ultimately, the patent inconsistency and unsustainability of anarchist tactics support charges of irrationalism, as epitomized by E. J. Hobsbawm's influential depiction of anarchism as millenarian.1 There has been no lack of attempts to rescue anarchism from such dismissive accounts in the last three decades. Some of these have involuntarily reinforced stereotypes. For example, Peter Marshall, in his justified effort to dispel the [End Page 1] customary association of anarchism with terrorism and violence, remarks that at its most violent the [anarchists'] action has typically not gone much beyond throwing up barricades or entering a village armed with rudimentary weapons, just as the millenarian stereotype would have it.2 Still, the advent of the new social history has spurred new research on anarchism, which persuasively argues for the effectiveness and relevance of anarchism. To mention only a few examples, this literature includes the books of Bruce Nelson on the Haymarket affair, of Richard Sonn and Alexander Varias on French anarchism, of John Lear on Mexico, of Kirwin Shaffer on Cuba, and of Matthew Thomas on Great Britain.3 Most of these works leave aside the mode of operation of anarchist direct action and insurrectionary tactics—and the related stereotypes about them—to focus on anarchist culture and its ability to influence society. Yet in focusing on the effectiveness of anarchism such works have failed in their own way to do justice to its rationality, in the standard sense of coherence among desires, beliefs, and behavior. In emphasizing the realism of anarchism and its ability to grapple with issues in the here and now, the adaptability and effectiveness of anarchist means are not gauged by the anarchists' goals, which tend to be regarded as a dead letter at best, or a dead weight at worst, but in contrast to them. Thus, Nelson's and Lear's emphasis on workers' traditions implies that anarchism had an instrumental value for workers who embraced it without fully sharing its objectives; likewise, anarchist goals were ultimately a liability for the countercultures studied by Thomas; and for Sonn and Varias, anarchist diversity, which enabled anarchists to be in tune with the culture of their times, was also the very reason that precluded them from successfully pursuing their anarchist ends. From the perspective of rationality, those who share Hobsbawm's judgment of monumental ineffectiveness, and those who seek to rescue anarchism from that charge, are two sides of the same irrationalist coin. Either way, anarchism is made sense of by introducing an element of irrationality, whether in the form of impossible aims, futile means, or absurd beliefs. In contrast, the present article focuses on rationality, rather than on effectiveness. The two issues are distinct, as is commonly recognized in social sciences. An example is the debate on magical thought since Durkheim and Weber, with its rejection of Lévy-Bruhl's theory of primitive mentality. As Raymond Boudon puts it, the case of magic is paradigmatic, since magical [End Page 2] beliefs are by definition false beliefs, and therefore magic is ineffective; yet, although their beliefs are without objective foundation, magicians have good reasons for believing what they believe, and therefore they are rationa1.4 This distinction is not equally familiar to historians; thus, the anarchists' failure to carry through a successful revolution tends to be taken as evidence against their rationality. Moreover, the focus of the present article is precisely on the organizational background of anarchist insurrectionary tactics. With few notable exceptions, such as Jerome Mintz's..." @default.
• W2019468992 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2019468992 creator A5064898202 @default.
• W2019468992 date "2011-01-01" @default.
• W2019468992 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2019468992 title "Collective Action, Opacity, and the Problem of Irrationality: Anarchism and the First of May, 1890-1892" @default.
• W2019468992 cites W1027406157 @default.
• W2019468992 cites W1512457525 @default.
• W2019468992 cites W1560389373 @default.
• W2019468992 cites W1602126617 @default.
• W2019468992 cites W1865733836 @default.
• W2019468992 cites W1966233851 @default.
• W2019468992 cites W1980491396 @default.
• W2019468992 cites W1986047384 @default.
• W2019468992 cites W1986321093 @default.
• W2019468992 cites W2007445003 @default.
• W2019468992 cites W2025287260 @default.
• W2019468992 cites W2039563006 @default.
• W2019468992 cites W2110589784 @default.
• W2019468992 cites W2130025511 @default.
• W2019468992 cites W2240612548 @default.
• W2019468992 cites W2321950136 @default.
• W2019468992 cites W2568730918 @default.
• W2019468992 cites W2798523176 @default.
• W2019468992 cites W293156947 @default.
• W2019468992 cites W2971262478 @default.
• W2019468992 cites W574069519 @default.
• W2019468992 cites W593155927 @default.
• W2019468992 cites W598845273 @default.
• W2019468992 cites W2933600516 @default.
• W2019468992 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/jsr.2011.0007" @default.
• W2019468992 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2019468992 type Work @default.
• W2019468992 sameAs 2019468992 @default.
• W2019468992 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2019468992 countsByYear W20194689922013 @default.
• W2019468992 countsByYear W20194689922014 @default.
• W2019468992 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2019468992 hasAuthorship W2019468992A5064898202 @default.
• W2019468992 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2019468992 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2019468992 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2019468992 hasConcept C173561787 @default.
• W2019468992 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2019468992 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2019468992 hasConcept C201717286 @default.
• W2019468992 hasConcept C2777019708 @default.
• W2019468992 hasConcept C2777932401 @default.
• W2019468992 hasConcept C2779702343 @default.
• W2019468992 hasConcept C2780791683 @default.
• W2019468992 hasConcept C2781017023 @default.
• W2019468992 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2019468992 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2019468992 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2019468992 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2019468992 hasConceptScore W2019468992C121332964 @default.
• W2019468992 hasConceptScore W2019468992C138885662 @default.
• W2019468992 hasConceptScore W2019468992C144024400 @default.
• W2019468992 hasConceptScore W2019468992C173561787 @default.
• W2019468992 hasConceptScore W2019468992C17744445 @default.
• W2019468992 hasConceptScore W2019468992C199539241 @default.
• W2019468992 hasConceptScore W2019468992C201717286 @default.
• W2019468992 hasConceptScore W2019468992C2777019708 @default.
• W2019468992 hasConceptScore W2019468992C2777932401 @default.
• W2019468992 hasConceptScore W2019468992C2779702343 @default.
• W2019468992 hasConceptScore W2019468992C2780791683 @default.
• W2019468992 hasConceptScore W2019468992C2781017023 @default.
• W2019468992 hasConceptScore W2019468992C41895202 @default.
• W2019468992 hasConceptScore W2019468992C62520636 @default.
• W2019468992 hasConceptScore W2019468992C94625758 @default.
• W2019468992 hasConceptScore W2019468992C95457728 @default.
• W2019468992 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2019468992 hasLocation W20194689921 @default.
• W2019468992 hasOpenAccess W2019468992 @default.
• W2019468992 hasPrimaryLocation W20194689921 @default.
• W2019468992 hasRelatedWork W2019468992 @default.
• W2019468992 hasRelatedWork W2102682165 @default.
• W2019468992 hasRelatedWork W2124827409 @default.
• W2019468992 hasRelatedWork W2223636793 @default.
• W2019468992 hasRelatedWork W2478717432 @default.
• W2019468992 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2019468992 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2019468992 hasRelatedWork W3016882428 @default.
• W2019468992 hasRelatedWork W3034929344 @default.
• W2019468992 hasRelatedWork W4237518079 @default.
• W2019468992 hasVolume "5" @default.
• W2019468992 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2019468992 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2019468992 magId "2019468992" @default.
• W2019468992 workType "article" @default.