FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2019600105> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2019600105 endingPage "471" @default.
• W2019600105 startingPage "465" @default.
• W2019600105 abstract "ObjectiveTo compare the effects of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) performed during group treatment sessions (GT) and individual treatment sessions (IT) to a control group (CG) of women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI).HypothesisThe group treatment sessions would have better effects compared to individual treatment sessions.Study designThis randomized controlled pilot study included women aged over 18 years, who complained of urinary leakage on stress and who had not undergone physical therapy for SUI before. Forty-nine women were randomly allocated to the PFMT in group treatment session (GT) (n = 17), PFMT in individual treatment session (IT) (n = 17) and control group (CG) (n = 15). The study was carried out in an outpatient physical therapy department in São Carlos, Brazil. Subjects on intervention groups were treated with the same PFMT protocol for 6 weeks, with two 1-h weekly sessions. The GT group carried out the PFMT in group treatment session and IT group in individual treatment session. The CG did not receive any treatment during the corresponding time. They were evaluated before and after treatment for primary outcome, urinary loss, and secondary outcomes, King's Health Questionnaire, pressure perineometry, pelvic floor muscle strength by digital palpation and subjective satisfaction. Participants, evaluator and the physical therapist were not blinded. Forty-five women completed the study and were included in the analysis. The statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon test for intragroup analysis and Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney test for intergroup analysis (p < 0.05).ResultsIn intragroup analysis, there was a significant reduction in urinary loss measured by pad test only in the IT group. For primary outcome, there was a significant difference only after treatment between GT and CG (p < 0.0001; effect size −0.91; 95% confidence interval from 0.56 to 5.80) as well as between IT and CG (p < 0.0001; effect size −0.90; 95% confidence interval from 0.54 to 5.84). There were differences after treatment in GT and IT groups for secondary outcomes: perineometry, muscle strength and in the domains of the quality of life questionnaire. For the CG group, there were not significant differences in any variables. In intergroup analysis for all variables, there were no differences between GT and IT groups. The two treated groups had similar subjective satisfaction (86%). There were no complaints of adverse effects due to treatment from either group.ConclusionThe results indicated similar improvement in clinical variables and in satisfaction with the treatment between IT and GT." @default.
• W2019600105 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2019600105 creator A5039475087 @default.
• W2019600105 creator A5065966369 @default.
• W2019600105 creator A5078265143 @default.
• W2019600105 date "2011-12-01" @default.
• W2019600105 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2019600105 title "Individual and group pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment in female stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled pilot study" @default.
• W2019600105 cites W1996409460 @default.
• W2019600105 cites W2002868911 @default.
• W2019600105 cites W2011897977 @default.
• W2019600105 cites W2012783382 @default.
• W2019600105 cites W2018215604 @default.
• W2019600105 cites W2019510346 @default.
• W2019600105 cites W2023110392 @default.
• W2019600105 cites W2047938176 @default.
• W2019600105 cites W2062881251 @default.
• W2019600105 cites W2070903105 @default.
• W2019600105 cites W2083745920 @default.
• W2019600105 cites W2102495089 @default.
• W2019600105 cites W2104262750 @default.
• W2019600105 cites W2113420406 @default.
• W2019600105 cites W2117699281 @default.
• W2019600105 cites W2137914036 @default.
• W2019600105 cites W2144455306 @default.
• W2019600105 cites W2146152828 @default.
• W2019600105 cites W2155933342 @default.
• W2019600105 cites W2160412363 @default.
• W2019600105 cites W2965500332 @default.
• W2019600105 cites W4248582980 @default.
• W2019600105 cites W4253168713 @default.
• W2019600105 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.09.003" @default.
• W2019600105 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21962461" @default.
• W2019600105 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2019600105 type Work @default.
• W2019600105 sameAs 2019600105 @default.
• W2019600105 citedByCount "64" @default.
• W2019600105 countsByYear W20196001052012 @default.
• W2019600105 countsByYear W20196001052013 @default.
• W2019600105 countsByYear W20196001052014 @default.
• W2019600105 countsByYear W20196001052015 @default.
• W2019600105 countsByYear W20196001052016 @default.
• W2019600105 countsByYear W20196001052017 @default.
• W2019600105 countsByYear W20196001052018 @default.
• W2019600105 countsByYear W20196001052019 @default.
• W2019600105 countsByYear W20196001052020 @default.
• W2019600105 countsByYear W20196001052021 @default.
• W2019600105 countsByYear W20196001052022 @default.
• W2019600105 countsByYear W20196001052023 @default.
• W2019600105 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2019600105 hasAuthorship W2019600105A5039475087 @default.
• W2019600105 hasAuthorship W2019600105A5065966369 @default.
• W2019600105 hasAuthorship W2019600105A5078265143 @default.
• W2019600105 hasBestOaLocation W20196001051 @default.
• W2019600105 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2019600105 hasConcept C126894567 @default.
• W2019600105 hasConcept C12868164 @default.
• W2019600105 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2019600105 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2019600105 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2019600105 hasConcept C2778531004 @default.
• W2019600105 hasConcept C2781244320 @default.
• W2019600105 hasConcept C2908639710 @default.
• W2019600105 hasConcept C3020110884 @default.
• W2019600105 hasConcept C65409693 @default.
• W2019600105 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2019600105 hasConceptScore W2019600105C126322002 @default.
• W2019600105 hasConceptScore W2019600105C126894567 @default.
• W2019600105 hasConceptScore W2019600105C12868164 @default.
• W2019600105 hasConceptScore W2019600105C141071460 @default.
• W2019600105 hasConceptScore W2019600105C168563851 @default.
• W2019600105 hasConceptScore W2019600105C1862650 @default.
• W2019600105 hasConceptScore W2019600105C2778531004 @default.
• W2019600105 hasConceptScore W2019600105C2781244320 @default.
• W2019600105 hasConceptScore W2019600105C2908639710 @default.
• W2019600105 hasConceptScore W2019600105C3020110884 @default.
• W2019600105 hasConceptScore W2019600105C65409693 @default.
• W2019600105 hasConceptScore W2019600105C71924100 @default.
• W2019600105 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2019600105 hasLocation W20196001051 @default.
• W2019600105 hasLocation W20196001052 @default.
• W2019600105 hasOpenAccess W2019600105 @default.
• W2019600105 hasPrimaryLocation W20196001051 @default.
• W2019600105 hasRelatedWork W1639002588 @default.
• W2019600105 hasRelatedWork W2008648933 @default.
• W2019600105 hasRelatedWork W2371310577 @default.
• W2019600105 hasRelatedWork W2586903195 @default.
• W2019600105 hasRelatedWork W2767249736 @default.
• W2019600105 hasRelatedWork W3084976406 @default.
• W2019600105 hasRelatedWork W3141333719 @default.
• W2019600105 hasRelatedWork W4200111041 @default.
• W2019600105 hasRelatedWork W4367173389 @default.
• W2019600105 hasRelatedWork W4380291872 @default.
• W2019600105 hasVolume "159" @default.
• W2019600105 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2019600105 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2019600105 magId "2019600105" @default.
• W2019600105 workType "article" @default.