FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2019679235> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2019679235 endingPage "490" @default.
• W2019679235 startingPage "486" @default.
• W2019679235 abstract "The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of endometrial cytology using the Uterobrush in the collection of samples for the diagnosis of endometrial lesions. The preparation technique for endometrial brushing specimens was also demonstrated. In their earlier study, the authors described the cyto-architectural criteria that appear to be more useful for the cytological assessment of endometrial lesions. Therefore, for the application of the diagnostic criteria, endometrial cytological sampling will become more important. With regard to the cell sample collection, the authors used the Uterobrush because the insertion into the uterine cavity is easy and painless. The authors compared the Uterobrush with the Endocyte, since they thought that cell clumps using the former device tended to be smaller. The purpose of the current study was to improve and evaluate cell preparation methods using the Uterobrush. The authors investigated three methods [i.e., conventional and improved techniques (“flicked” method) with the Uterobrush and the Endocyte] of endometrial cell collection and preparation. Using conventional methods, a brush was rolled along a glass slide and the collected material spread and smeared. However, using the “flicked” method, a brush is strongly flicked with forceps, so that the cells are transferred to the slide and its position is moved along the slide little by little and smeared. The frequency by size of cell clumps with tube or sheet-shaped pattern was examined in the preparations. Cell block specimens with the Uterobrush were also investigated. Endometrial cytology from a total of 90 women was evaluated. Most were outpatients and all were older than 20 yr (ranging from 20 to 54, average 42.7 yr). Of these, 30 cases from each group were examined by three methods. Uterobrush samples prepared by the “flicked” method have a greater quantity of cell clumps than those using the Endocyte sampler, while the frequency-by-size of cell clumps was by degree the same as the Endocyte. The cell clumps obtained in the Uterobrush “flicked” method preparation was considered equivalent or superior as an aid to making a diagnosis of endometrial lesions and it became obvious that the same criteria were applicable to both of instruments. Our cytological examination may be a potent aid to making a diagnosis of endometrial lesions and these findings will be helpful in the standardization of criteria in direct intrauterine cell samples. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2006;34:486–490. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc." @default.
• W2019679235 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2019679235 creator A5002031704 @default.
• W2019679235 creator A5005729685 @default.
• W2019679235 creator A5006249940 @default.
• W2019679235 creator A5016044656 @default.
• W2019679235 creator A5041778300 @default.
• W2019679235 date "2006-01-01" @default.
• W2019679235 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2019679235 title "Direct intrauterine sampling with Uterobrush: Cell preparation by the “flicked” method" @default.
• W2019679235 cites W1713990897 @default.
• W2019679235 cites W2019690600 @default.
• W2019679235 cites W2037061027 @default.
• W2019679235 cites W2069773312 @default.
• W2019679235 cites W2074683902 @default.
• W2019679235 cites W2075768050 @default.
• W2019679235 cites W2094308427 @default.
• W2019679235 cites W2123328671 @default.
• W2019679235 cites W2133126728 @default.
• W2019679235 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.20528" @default.
• W2019679235 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16783769" @default.
• W2019679235 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2019679235 type Work @default.
• W2019679235 sameAs 2019679235 @default.
• W2019679235 citedByCount "14" @default.
• W2019679235 countsByYear W20196792352012 @default.
• W2019679235 countsByYear W20196792352016 @default.
• W2019679235 countsByYear W20196792352021 @default.
• W2019679235 countsByYear W20196792352022 @default.
• W2019679235 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2019679235 hasAuthorship W2019679235A5002031704 @default.
• W2019679235 hasAuthorship W2019679235A5005729685 @default.
• W2019679235 hasAuthorship W2019679235A5006249940 @default.
• W2019679235 hasAuthorship W2019679235A5016044656 @default.
• W2019679235 hasAuthorship W2019679235A5041778300 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConcept C106131492 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConcept C119599485 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConcept C140779682 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConcept C16108499 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConcept C18823058 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConcept C2776477335 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConcept C2776914593 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConcept C2779066055 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConcept C2779742232 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConcept C31972630 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConceptScore W2019679235C106131492 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConceptScore W2019679235C119599485 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConceptScore W2019679235C126322002 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConceptScore W2019679235C126838900 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConceptScore W2019679235C127413603 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConceptScore W2019679235C131872663 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConceptScore W2019679235C140779682 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConceptScore W2019679235C141071460 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConceptScore W2019679235C142724271 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConceptScore W2019679235C16108499 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConceptScore W2019679235C18823058 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConceptScore W2019679235C2776477335 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConceptScore W2019679235C2776914593 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConceptScore W2019679235C2779066055 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConceptScore W2019679235C2779742232 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConceptScore W2019679235C29456083 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConceptScore W2019679235C31972630 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConceptScore W2019679235C41008148 @default.
• W2019679235 hasConceptScore W2019679235C71924100 @default.
• W2019679235 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W2019679235 hasLocation W20196792351 @default.
• W2019679235 hasLocation W20196792352 @default.
• W2019679235 hasOpenAccess W2019679235 @default.
• W2019679235 hasPrimaryLocation W20196792351 @default.
• W2019679235 hasRelatedWork W2019562741 @default.
• W2019679235 hasRelatedWork W2019679235 @default.
• W2019679235 hasRelatedWork W2091449890 @default.
• W2019679235 hasRelatedWork W2109765734 @default.
• W2019679235 hasRelatedWork W2246655130 @default.
• W2019679235 hasRelatedWork W2314196687 @default.
• W2019679235 hasRelatedWork W2405741311 @default.
• W2019679235 hasRelatedWork W2464678847 @default.
• W2019679235 hasRelatedWork W3193573748 @default.
• W2019679235 hasRelatedWork W4377694679 @default.
• W2019679235 hasVolume "34" @default.
• W2019679235 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2019679235 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2019679235 magId "2019679235" @default.
• W2019679235 workType "article" @default.