FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2019778672> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2019778672 endingPage "E329" @default.
• W2019778672 startingPage "E323" @default.
• W2019778672 abstract "In Brief Study Design. A prospective diagnostic clinical trial. Objective. To evaluate the accuracy, repeatability of a new method for measuring spinal curvature in patients with scoliosis, the axis-line-distance technique (ALDT), in comparison with the Cobb method. Summary of Background Data. Timely and accurate determination of the degree of lateral curvature of the spine is essential for deciding the appropriate treatment method for scoliosis. Although the Cobb method has been accepted as the clinical standard for 60 years, many investigators have reported a high degree of variance in the measurements of spinal curvature obtained using this method. Therefore, the development of an alternative method that incorporates the advances in imaging technology and assessment is needed. Methods. Sixty-five scoliosis patients were evaluated by 6 physician observers. The spinal curves were measured on 2 separate occasions using the Cobb method and the ALDT on a picture archiving and communication system workstation. The time interval between the 2 measurements was 3 weeks, and the data were analyzed by a paired-sample Student t test and Pearson correlation method using SPSS 12.0 software package. Results. Intraobserver variance of the 2 measurements, the minimum variance, the maximum variance, and the mean and standard deviation values were 0°, 26°, and 5.14° ± 0.69° for the Cobb method, and 0 mm, 20 mm, and 2.55 ± 0.38 mm for the ALDT, respectively. There was a significant intraobserver difference in the Cobb angle measurements among 3 of the 6 observers (P < 0.05). No significant intraobserver variance in ALDT measurements was detected. The mean interobserver measurement variance for the Cobb method was 6.54° ± 1.35°, significantly greater than that for the ALDT (3.58 ± 0.93 mm; P < 0.05). There were significant positive correlation between the ALDT and the Cobb measurements (r = 0.73, P < 0.05). Conclusion. The ALDT is more reliable, reproducible, and straightforward, and less error-prone than the Cobb method for measurements of spinal curvature. The accuracy and reproducibility measurements of the degree of scoliosis were compared between Cobb's method and a new method (the axis-line-distance technique). The new technique takes advantage of recent advances in imaging technology and imaging assessment, and produces measurements with less variance and more reproducibility." @default.
• W2019778672 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2019778672 creator A5012237824 @default.
• W2019778672 creator A5019923856 @default.
• W2019778672 creator A5027835055 @default.
• W2019778672 creator A5071437310 @default.
• W2019778672 creator A5074999356 @default.
• W2019778672 creator A5076702481 @default.
• W2019778672 creator A5078896119 @default.
• W2019778672 creator A5086747332 @default.
• W2019778672 date "2009-04-01" @default.
• W2019778672 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2019778672 title "Accuracy and Repeatability of a New Method for Measuring Scoliosis Curvature" @default.
• W2019778672 cites W152404302 @default.
• W2019778672 cites W1956242568 @default.
• W2019778672 cites W1969973213 @default.
• W2019778672 cites W1977392876 @default.
• W2019778672 cites W2009517862 @default.
• W2019778672 cites W2029079835 @default.
• W2019778672 cites W2042311485 @default.
• W2019778672 cites W2059935978 @default.
• W2019778672 cites W2084292074 @default.
• W2019778672 cites W2085152793 @default.
• W2019778672 cites W2103591214 @default.
• W2019778672 cites W2139774746 @default.
• W2019778672 cites W2160330988 @default.
• W2019778672 cites W2165278138 @default.
• W2019778672 cites W2245256444 @default.
• W2019778672 cites W2328221614 @default.
• W2019778672 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e31819b2504" @default.
• W2019778672 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19531987" @default.
• W2019778672 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2019778672 type Work @default.
• W2019778672 sameAs 2019778672 @default.
• W2019778672 citedByCount "41" @default.
• W2019778672 countsByYear W20197786722012 @default.
• W2019778672 countsByYear W20197786722013 @default.
• W2019778672 countsByYear W20197786722014 @default.
• W2019778672 countsByYear W20197786722015 @default.
• W2019778672 countsByYear W20197786722016 @default.
• W2019778672 countsByYear W20197786722017 @default.
• W2019778672 countsByYear W20197786722018 @default.
• W2019778672 countsByYear W20197786722019 @default.
• W2019778672 countsByYear W20197786722020 @default.
• W2019778672 countsByYear W20197786722021 @default.
• W2019778672 countsByYear W20197786722023 @default.
• W2019778672 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2019778672 hasAuthorship W2019778672A5012237824 @default.
• W2019778672 hasAuthorship W2019778672A5019923856 @default.
• W2019778672 hasAuthorship W2019778672A5027835055 @default.
• W2019778672 hasAuthorship W2019778672A5071437310 @default.
• W2019778672 hasAuthorship W2019778672A5074999356 @default.
• W2019778672 hasAuthorship W2019778672A5076702481 @default.
• W2019778672 hasAuthorship W2019778672A5078896119 @default.
• W2019778672 hasAuthorship W2019778672A5086747332 @default.
• W2019778672 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2019778672 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2019778672 hasConcept C154020017 @default.
• W2019778672 hasConcept C195065555 @default.
• W2019778672 hasConcept C22679943 @default.
• W2019778672 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2019778672 hasConcept C2775946787 @default.
• W2019778672 hasConcept C2778871979 @default.
• W2019778672 hasConcept C2780955175 @default.
• W2019778672 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2019778672 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2019778672 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2019778672 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2019778672 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2019778672 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2019778672 hasConceptScore W2019778672C105795698 @default.
• W2019778672 hasConceptScore W2019778672C141071460 @default.
• W2019778672 hasConceptScore W2019778672C154020017 @default.
• W2019778672 hasConceptScore W2019778672C195065555 @default.
• W2019778672 hasConceptScore W2019778672C22679943 @default.
• W2019778672 hasConceptScore W2019778672C2524010 @default.
• W2019778672 hasConceptScore W2019778672C2775946787 @default.
• W2019778672 hasConceptScore W2019778672C2778871979 @default.
• W2019778672 hasConceptScore W2019778672C2780955175 @default.
• W2019778672 hasConceptScore W2019778672C29694066 @default.
• W2019778672 hasConceptScore W2019778672C2989005 @default.
• W2019778672 hasConceptScore W2019778672C33923547 @default.
• W2019778672 hasConceptScore W2019778672C54355233 @default.
• W2019778672 hasConceptScore W2019778672C71924100 @default.
• W2019778672 hasConceptScore W2019778672C86803240 @default.
• W2019778672 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W2019778672 hasLocation W20197786721 @default.
• W2019778672 hasLocation W20197786722 @default.
• W2019778672 hasOpenAccess W2019778672 @default.
• W2019778672 hasPrimaryLocation W20197786721 @default.
• W2019778672 hasRelatedWork W2019778672 @default.
• W2019778672 hasRelatedWork W2045209134 @default.
• W2019778672 hasRelatedWork W2065958549 @default.
• W2019778672 hasRelatedWork W2126178566 @default.
• W2019778672 hasRelatedWork W2323309250 @default.
• W2019778672 hasRelatedWork W2373722681 @default.
• W2019778672 hasRelatedWork W2465193852 @default.
• W2019778672 hasRelatedWork W2810943228 @default.

• next