FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2019963042> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2019963042 endingPage "108" @default.
• W2019963042 startingPage "75" @default.
• W2019963042 abstract "Previous articleNext article No AccessThe Political Economy of Free Trade: Voting in the British General Election of 1906Douglas A. IrwinDouglas A. Irwin Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Law and Economics Volume 37, Number 1Apr., 1994 Sponsored by The University of Chicago Booth School of Business and The University of Chicago Law School Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/467307 Views: 34Total views on this site Citations: 54Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1994 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:JunYun Kim, Stephen Magee, Hongshik Lee Capitalization of the economy and labor return: How does lobbying affect resource allocation?, Economic Modelling 120 (Mar 2023): 106180.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.106180Julia Calvert, Kyla Tienhaara Beyond ‘Once BITten, Twice Shy’: defending the legitimacy of investor-state dispute settlement in Peru and Australia, Review of International Political Economy 56 (Oct 2022): 1–25.https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2022.2134172Eddy S.F. Yeung, Kai Quek Relative Gains in the Shadow of a Trade War, International Organization 5 (Mar 2022): 1–25.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818322000030Diana Van Patten, Esteban Méndez Voting on a Trade Agreement: Firm Networks and Attitudes Toward Openness, SSRN Electronic Journal 10 (Jan 2022).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4110761Sung Eun Kim, Sujin Cha Do Voters Reward Politicians for Trade Liberalization? Evidence from South Korea, The Review of International Organizations 68 (Sep 2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-021-09442-0Banri Ito Trade exposure and electoral protectionism: evidence from Japanese politician-level data, Review of World Economics 157, no.11 (Sep 2020): 181–205.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-020-00392-0Jacopo Timini Staying dry on Spanish wine: The rejection of the 1905 Spanish-Italian trade agreement, European Journal of Political Economy 63 (Jun 2020): 101892.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101892Lucy Barnes Trade and redistribution: trade politics and the origins of progressive taxation, Political Science Research and Methods 8, no.22 (Oct 2019): 197–214.https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2019.39Eddie Hearn Disentangling the relationship between sociotropic and egotropic trade attitudes: A survey experiment in Japan, Japanese Journal of Political Science 21, no.11 (Sep 2019): 31–42.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1468109919000124Quynh Nguyen, Gabriele Spilker The Elephant in the Negotiation Room, (Aug 2019): 17–47.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108757683.002Amaney Jamal, Helen V. Milner Economic self-interest, information, and trade policy preferences: evidence from an experiment in Tunisia, Review of International Political Economy 26, no.44 (Jun 2019): 545–572.https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2018.1563559Kevin Hjortshøj O’Rourke Economic History and Contemporary Challenges to Globalization, The Journal of Economic History 79, no.22 (Apr 2019): 356–382.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050719000044Quynh Nguyen Taking a Step Back: Economic Performance and Issue Salience of International Trade Policy, International Journal of Public Opinion Research 31, no.11 (Feb 2018): 25–44.https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edx024Jacopo Timini Staying Dry on Spanish Wine: The Rejection of the 1905 Spanish-Italian Trade Agreement, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2019).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3468196Patrick D. Alexander, Ian Keay A general equilibrium analysis of Canada’s national policy, Explorations in Economic History 68 (Apr 2018): 1–15.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2017.11.002Alan de Bromhead Globalisation and Trade, (Dec 2018): 71–77.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96568-0_9Banri Ito Does electoral competition affect politicians’ trade policy preferences? Evidence from Japan, Public Choice 165, no.3-43-4 (Jan 2016): 239–261.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-015-0306-3JIM TOMLINSON THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF GLOBALIZATION: THE GENESIS OF DUNDEE'S TWO ‘UNITED FRONTS’ IN THE 1930s, The Historical Journal 57, no.11 (Jan 2014): 225–245.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X13000344Hak-Seon Lee Foreign Direct Investment and the Demand for Protection in a Network of Producers and Consumers: The U.S. Case, 1982–1996, Journal of Transnational Management 19, no.11 (Feb 2014): 38–61.https://doi.org/10.1080/15475778.2014.869463Maarten Van Dijck, Tom Truyts The Agricultural Invasion and the Political Economy of Agricultural Trade Policy in Belgium, 1875-1900, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2014).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2378740Chun-Fang Chiang, Jin-Tan Liu, Tsai-Wei Wen Individual Preferences for Trade Partners in Taiwan, Economics & Politics 25, no.11 (Feb 2013): 91–109.https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12000Cathie Jo Martin Party Politics and the Default Move from Coordination to Liberalism, Business History Review 87, no.33 (Oct 2013): 431–459.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007680513000718Robert Urbatsch A Referendum on Trade Theory: Voting on Free Trade in Costa Rica, International Organization 67, no.11 (Jan 2013): 197–214.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818312000355Robert Hodgson, John Maloney Economic voting in Britain, 1857–1914, Electoral Studies 31, no.44 (Dec 2012): 668–678.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2012.07.006Juan Díez Medrano, Michael Braun Uninformed citizens and support for free trade, Review of International Political Economy 19, no.33 (Jun 2011): 448–476.https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2011.561127Isa Camyar Party Politics and International Trade: Mainstream Parties, Niche Parties, and Trade Openness1, International Studies Quarterly 56, no.22 (Jan 2012): 397–404.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00714.xNahid Aslanbeigui, Guy Oakes On Pigou’s Theory of Economic Policy Analysis, OEconomia 2012, no.0202 (Jul 2012): 123–150.https://doi.org/10.4074/S2113520712012017Nahid Aslanbeigui, Guy Oakes On Pigou’s Theory of Economic Policy Analysis, OEconomia , no.2-22-2 (Jun 2012): 123–150.https://doi.org/10.4000/oeconomia.1373Bruce A. Blonigen Revisiting the evidence on trade policy preferences, Journal of International Economics 85, no.11 (Sep 2011): 129–135.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2011.05.010Phillip Y. Lipscy, Yevgeniy Kirpichevsky Congressional Preferences and the Structure of Delegation: Reassessing the Effect of Divided Government on U.S. Trade Policy, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1893289Sibylle H. Lehmann The German Elections in the 1870s: Why Germany Turned from Liberalism to Protectionism, The Journal of Economic History 70, no.0101 (Mar 2010): 146.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050710000082Mark R. Brawley Tariff reform, taxes and land: Trade-based cleavages in pre-World War I Britain, Review of International Political Economy 16, no.55 (Dec 2009): 827–853.https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290802554569Bumba MukherjeeDale L. SmithQuan Li Labor (Im)mobility and the Politics of Trade Protection in Majoritarian Democracies, The Journal of Politics 71, no.11 (Jul 2015): 291–308.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381608090191Sibylle Lehmann The German Elections in the 1870s: Why Germany Turned from Liberalism to Protectionism, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2009).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1500308Juan Díez Medrano, Michael Braun Cognition, Resources, and Institutions in the Explanation of Attitudes to Free Trade, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2009).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1517056MICHAEL HUBERMAN Ticket to trade: Belgian labour and globalization before 1914, The Economic History Review 61, no.22 (May 2008): 326–359.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0289.2007.00396.xArye Hillman International Trade Policy: Departure From Free Trade, (Jan 2008): 481–496.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-75870-1_26David Greenaway, Douglas R. Nelson The Distinct Political Economies of Trade and Migration Policy: Through the Window of Endogenous Policy Models, with a Focus on North America, (Jan 2006): 295–327.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31045-7_20 Quellen- und Literaturverzeichnis, (Apr 2014): 382–420.https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666351501.382Anna Maria Mayda, Dani Rodrik Why are some people (and countries) more protectionist than others?, European Economic Review 49, no.66 (Aug 2005): 1393–1430.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.01.002Eric Sheppard Constructing free trade: from Manchester boosterism to global management, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 30, no.22 (Jun 2005): 151–172.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00158.xAlok K. Bohara, Alejandro Islas Camargo, Therese Grijalva, Kishore Gawande Fundamental dimensions of U.S. trade policy, Journal of International Economics 65, no.11 (Jan 2005): 93–125.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2003.10.002Eugene Beaulieu, Christopher Magee Four Simple Tests of Campaign Contributions and Trade Policy Preferences, Economics and Politics 16, no.22 (Jul 2004): 163–187.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0343.2004.00136.xHelen V. Milner, Benjamin Judkins Partisanship, Trade Policy, and Globalization: Is There a Left-Right Divide on Trade Policy?, International Studies Quarterly 48, no.11 (Mar 2004): 95–120.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-8833.2004.00293.xBenjamin O. Fordham, Timothy J. McKeown Selection and Influence: Interest Groups and Congressional Voting on Trade Policy, International Organization 57, no.0303 (Jul 2003).https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818303573076Pushan Dutt, Devashish Mitra Endogenous trade policy through majority voting: an empirical investigation, Journal of International Economics 58, no.11 (Oct 2002): 107–133.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(01)00162-3Kenneth F. Scheve, Matthew J. Slaughter What determines individual trade-policy preferences?, Journal of International Economics 54, no.22 (Aug 2001): 267–292.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(00)00094-5W. DANIEL GARST From Sectoral Linkages to Class Conflict, Comparative Political Studies 32, no.77 (Jun 2016): 788–809.https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414099032007002Helen V. Milner THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE, Annual Review of Political Science 2, no.11 (Jun 1999): 91–114.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.91W. DANIEL GARST From Factor Endowments to Class Struggle, Comparative Political Studies 31, no.11 (Jun 2016): 22–44.https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414098031001002Frank Trentmann The transformation of fiscal reform: reciprocity, modernization, and the fiscal debate within the business community in early twentieth century Britain, The Historical Journal 39, no.44 (Feb 2009): 1005–1048.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X00024742Gary M. Anderson, Dennis Halcoussis, Robert D. Tollison Drafting the competition: Labor unions and military conscription, Defence and Peace Economics 7, no.33 (Jul 1996): 189–202.https://doi.org/10.1080/10430719608404852 Sara Fisher Ellison , and Wallace P. Mullin Economics and Politics: The Case of Sugar Tariff Reform, The Journal of Law and Economics 38, no.22 (Oct 2015): 335–366.https://doi.org/10.1086/467335Arye L. Hillman International Trade Policy: Departure from Free Trade, (): 129–138.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-47828-4_11" @default.
• W2019963042 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2019963042 creator A5007430520 @default.
• W2019963042 date "1994-04-01" @default.
• W2019963042 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2019963042 title "The Political Economy of Free Trade: Voting in the British General Election of 1906" @default.
• W2019963042 cites W1488792619 @default.
• W2019963042 cites W1562267932 @default.
• W2019963042 cites W1577492324 @default.
• W2019963042 cites W1581362039 @default.
• W2019963042 cites W1969292440 @default.
• W2019963042 cites W1981449661 @default.
• W2019963042 cites W1987731262 @default.
• W2019963042 cites W1995539805 @default.
• W2019963042 cites W2001721487 @default.
• W2019963042 cites W2031071869 @default.
• W2019963042 cites W2033352346 @default.
• W2019963042 cites W2039741075 @default.
• W2019963042 cites W2044028515 @default.
• W2019963042 cites W2059506911 @default.
• W2019963042 cites W2067603287 @default.
• W2019963042 cites W2083700162 @default.
• W2019963042 cites W2087552137 @default.
• W2019963042 cites W2099961697 @default.
• W2019963042 cites W2109909068 @default.
• W2019963042 cites W2114639189 @default.
• W2019963042 cites W2120868132 @default.
• W2019963042 cites W2135071605 @default.
• W2019963042 cites W2915789364 @default.
• W2019963042 cites W2991499120 @default.
• W2019963042 cites W3122474771 @default.
• W2019963042 cites W3144864563 @default.
• W2019963042 doi "https://doi.org/10.1086/467307" @default.
• W2019963042 hasPublicationYear "1994" @default.
• W2019963042 type Work @default.
• W2019963042 sameAs 2019963042 @default.
• W2019963042 citedByCount "69" @default.
• W2019963042 countsByYear W20199630422012 @default.
• W2019963042 countsByYear W20199630422013 @default.
• W2019963042 countsByYear W20199630422014 @default.
• W2019963042 countsByYear W20199630422015 @default.
• W2019963042 countsByYear W20199630422016 @default.
• W2019963042 countsByYear W20199630422018 @default.
• W2019963042 countsByYear W20199630422019 @default.
• W2019963042 countsByYear W20199630422020 @default.
• W2019963042 countsByYear W20199630422021 @default.
• W2019963042 countsByYear W20199630422022 @default.
• W2019963042 countsByYear W20199630422023 @default.
• W2019963042 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2019963042 hasAuthorship W2019963042A5007430520 @default.
• W2019963042 hasConcept C138921699 @default.
• W2019963042 hasConcept C155202549 @default.
• W2019963042 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2019963042 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2019963042 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2019963042 hasConcept C520049643 @default.
• W2019963042 hasConcept C59742305 @default.
• W2019963042 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2019963042 hasConceptScore W2019963042C138921699 @default.
• W2019963042 hasConceptScore W2019963042C155202549 @default.
• W2019963042 hasConceptScore W2019963042C162324750 @default.
• W2019963042 hasConceptScore W2019963042C17744445 @default.
• W2019963042 hasConceptScore W2019963042C199539241 @default.
• W2019963042 hasConceptScore W2019963042C520049643 @default.
• W2019963042 hasConceptScore W2019963042C59742305 @default.
• W2019963042 hasConceptScore W2019963042C94625758 @default.
• W2019963042 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2019963042 hasLocation W20199630421 @default.
• W2019963042 hasOpenAccess W2019963042 @default.
• W2019963042 hasPrimaryLocation W20199630421 @default.
• W2019963042 hasRelatedWork W1890592572 @default.
• W2019963042 hasRelatedWork W1965900777 @default.
• W2019963042 hasRelatedWork W2056391787 @default.
• W2019963042 hasRelatedWork W2068150807 @default.
• W2019963042 hasRelatedWork W2134475008 @default.
• W2019963042 hasRelatedWork W2761888295 @default.
• W2019963042 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2019963042 hasRelatedWork W4248388591 @default.
• W2019963042 hasRelatedWork W4320933822 @default.
• W2019963042 hasRelatedWork W2622270436 @default.
• W2019963042 hasVolume "37" @default.
• W2019963042 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2019963042 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2019963042 magId "2019963042" @default.
• W2019963042 workType "article" @default.