Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2020134792> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 65 of
65
with 100 items per page.
- W2020134792 abstract "Any comparative study involving several legal systems presents special difficulties both n the exposition of actual principles and rules and in the analysis of the underlying concepts. These inherent difficulties are compounded if there are fundamental differences in approach to the noiion and the sources of the lasv and, consequently, to the treatment of legal topics. Out of the four legal systems chosen here for a comparative review, Islamic, French and English law have evolved from completely different origins and developed markedly distincove features. Islamsc and English law have mainly been, and have to a great extent remained, introspective and self-contained, whereas French law has heavily drawn on the revived Roman law as supplemented by medieval customs and modified by liberal ideas and scholarly works through the period of Renaissance going into and after the French Revolution of 1789. Iranian law, by contrast, has been, siIlce the Constituiiorlal Revolution of 1906, a hybrid product of the fusion, and at imes juxtaposition, of Islamic, Shfah, and French law. After the Revolution of 1979 and the consequent change of the regime in Iran into the Islamic Republic, the structural pattern of the law in substantive civil matters has remained almost intact, but the concepiion of and the approach to the law and its sources, as well as the composition and function of the legislature and judiciary, have radically changed. The four main Sunni schools show differences on details but share certain basic common feanares when contrasted with the Twelver Shlzah as the main SluKah school which is the official faith m Iran. At a higher level of abstraction, Shitah and Sunn1 law show, despite their differences as to details or certain methodological principles, a common configuration which makes it possible to refer to Islamic law as an overall system. French and Iranlan law are codified but English law is not, though the technicality of codification in itself is not a determining factor, as the American experience of codification demonstrates. English law, notwithstanding a vast post-World War II legislaiive production, remains basically judge-made and continues to be case-" @default.
- W2020134792 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2020134792 creator A5007414579 @default.
- W2020134792 date "1991-01-01" @default.
- W2020134792 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
- W2020134792 title "Sources of Law Under English, French, Islamic and Iranian Law-a Comparative Review of Legal Techniques" @default.
- W2020134792 doi "https://doi.org/10.1163/157302591x00151" @default.
- W2020134792 hasPublicationYear "1991" @default.
- W2020134792 type Work @default.
- W2020134792 sameAs 2020134792 @default.
- W2020134792 citedByCount "3" @default.
- W2020134792 countsByYear W20201347922020 @default.
- W2020134792 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2020134792 hasAuthorship W2020134792A5007414579 @default.
- W2020134792 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2020134792 hasConcept C149209484 @default.
- W2020134792 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
- W2020134792 hasConcept C168702047 @default.
- W2020134792 hasConcept C170706310 @default.
- W2020134792 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2020134792 hasConcept C177986884 @default.
- W2020134792 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2020134792 hasConcept C2780677400 @default.
- W2020134792 hasConcept C30730545 @default.
- W2020134792 hasConcept C4445939 @default.
- W2020134792 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
- W2020134792 hasConceptScore W2020134792C144024400 @default.
- W2020134792 hasConceptScore W2020134792C149209484 @default.
- W2020134792 hasConceptScore W2020134792C166957645 @default.
- W2020134792 hasConceptScore W2020134792C168702047 @default.
- W2020134792 hasConceptScore W2020134792C170706310 @default.
- W2020134792 hasConceptScore W2020134792C17744445 @default.
- W2020134792 hasConceptScore W2020134792C177986884 @default.
- W2020134792 hasConceptScore W2020134792C199539241 @default.
- W2020134792 hasConceptScore W2020134792C2780677400 @default.
- W2020134792 hasConceptScore W2020134792C30730545 @default.
- W2020134792 hasConceptScore W2020134792C4445939 @default.
- W2020134792 hasConceptScore W2020134792C95457728 @default.
- W2020134792 hasLocation W20201347921 @default.
- W2020134792 hasOpenAccess W2020134792 @default.
- W2020134792 hasPrimaryLocation W20201347921 @default.
- W2020134792 hasRelatedWork W1497753330 @default.
- W2020134792 hasRelatedWork W1502776698 @default.
- W2020134792 hasRelatedWork W1580296679 @default.
- W2020134792 hasRelatedWork W1581631605 @default.
- W2020134792 hasRelatedWork W1601303119 @default.
- W2020134792 hasRelatedWork W1774663677 @default.
- W2020134792 hasRelatedWork W2008176419 @default.
- W2020134792 hasRelatedWork W206268651 @default.
- W2020134792 hasRelatedWork W2154407147 @default.
- W2020134792 hasRelatedWork W2277579782 @default.
- W2020134792 hasRelatedWork W249647053 @default.
- W2020134792 hasRelatedWork W2498667279 @default.
- W2020134792 hasRelatedWork W2565429812 @default.
- W2020134792 hasRelatedWork W2798814441 @default.
- W2020134792 hasRelatedWork W2810798702 @default.
- W2020134792 hasRelatedWork W2945923776 @default.
- W2020134792 hasRelatedWork W2974694872 @default.
- W2020134792 hasRelatedWork W2981401129 @default.
- W2020134792 hasRelatedWork W2998601462 @default.
- W2020134792 hasRelatedWork W3014135463 @default.
- W2020134792 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2020134792 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2020134792 magId "2020134792" @default.
- W2020134792 workType "article" @default.