FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2020185656> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2020185656 endingPage "252.e1" @default.
• W2020185656 startingPage "246" @default.
• W2020185656 abstract "Study objective To inform the development of interventions that could improve patient engagement around the risks and benefits of alternative approaches to pain management in the emergency department (ED), we seek to capture the perspectives and experiences of patients treated for pain in this setting. Methods Three trained interviewers conducted semistructured open-ended telephone interviews with patients discharged from a single urban academic ED after presenting with acute pain related to fracture, renal colic, or musculoskeletal back injury. We recruited subjects until achieving thematic saturation according to periodic review of the interview transcripts. Interviews were audio recorded, professionally transcribed, and uploaded into QSR NVivo (version 10.0) for coding and analysis using modified grounded theory. An interdisciplinary team double coded the data and convened to review emerging themes, ensure interrater reliability, and establish consensus on discrepancies. Results We had 23 completed subject interviews, the majority of which were women. Interrater reliability for coding exceeded 90%. The major themes elicited centered on domains of patient awareness of the potential for opioid dependence and patient-provider communication relating to pain management. From the patient perspective, emergency physicians typically do not present alternative pain management options or discuss the risks of opioid dependence. Patients with negative experiences related to pain management describe deficiencies in patient-provider communication leading to misunderstanding of clinical diagnoses, fragmentation of care among their health care providers, and a desire to be involved in the decisionmaking process around their pain management. Patients with positive experiences commented on regular communication with their care team, rapid pain management, and the empathetic nature of their care providers. Patients communicate fears about the risks of opioid addiction, beliefs that following a prescribed opioid regimen is protective of developing opioid dependence, and an understanding of the broader tensions that providers face relating to the prescription of opioid therapy. Conclusion Patients identified a deficit of communication around opioid risk and pain management options in the ED. To inform the development of interventions that could improve patient engagement around the risks and benefits of alternative approaches to pain management in the emergency department (ED), we seek to capture the perspectives and experiences of patients treated for pain in this setting. Three trained interviewers conducted semistructured open-ended telephone interviews with patients discharged from a single urban academic ED after presenting with acute pain related to fracture, renal colic, or musculoskeletal back injury. We recruited subjects until achieving thematic saturation according to periodic review of the interview transcripts. Interviews were audio recorded, professionally transcribed, and uploaded into QSR NVivo (version 10.0) for coding and analysis using modified grounded theory. An interdisciplinary team double coded the data and convened to review emerging themes, ensure interrater reliability, and establish consensus on discrepancies. We had 23 completed subject interviews, the majority of which were women. Interrater reliability for coding exceeded 90%. The major themes elicited centered on domains of patient awareness of the potential for opioid dependence and patient-provider communication relating to pain management. From the patient perspective, emergency physicians typically do not present alternative pain management options or discuss the risks of opioid dependence. Patients with negative experiences related to pain management describe deficiencies in patient-provider communication leading to misunderstanding of clinical diagnoses, fragmentation of care among their health care providers, and a desire to be involved in the decisionmaking process around their pain management. Patients with positive experiences commented on regular communication with their care team, rapid pain management, and the empathetic nature of their care providers. Patients communicate fears about the risks of opioid addiction, beliefs that following a prescribed opioid regimen is protective of developing opioid dependence, and an understanding of the broader tensions that providers face relating to the prescription of opioid therapy. Patients identified a deficit of communication around opioid risk and pain management options in the ED." @default.
• W2020185656 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2020185656 creator A5000007589 @default.
• W2020185656 creator A5000787211 @default.
• W2020185656 creator A5008854544 @default.
• W2020185656 creator A5043085457 @default.
• W2020185656 creator A5047296614 @default.
• W2020185656 creator A5064474779 @default.
• W2020185656 date "2015-09-01" @default.
• W2020185656 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2020185656 title "Patient Perspectives of Acute Pain Management in the Era of the Opioid Epidemic" @default.
• W2020185656 cites W1524486376 @default.
• W2020185656 cites W1984862870 @default.
• W2020185656 cites W1999045083 @default.
• W2020185656 cites W2014900124 @default.
• W2020185656 cites W2037555112 @default.
• W2020185656 cites W2042716089 @default.
• W2020185656 cites W2050389350 @default.
• W2020185656 cites W2051720694 @default.
• W2020185656 cites W2079790312 @default.
• W2020185656 cites W2138664283 @default.
• W2020185656 cites W2146382102 @default.
• W2020185656 cites W2169513286 @default.
• W2020185656 cites W2171114512 @default.
• W2020185656 cites W26265652 @default.
• W2020185656 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.03.025" @default.
• W2020185656 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25865093" @default.
• W2020185656 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2020185656 type Work @default.
• W2020185656 sameAs 2020185656 @default.
• W2020185656 citedByCount "41" @default.
• W2020185656 countsByYear W20201856562015 @default.
• W2020185656 countsByYear W20201856562016 @default.
• W2020185656 countsByYear W20201856562017 @default.
• W2020185656 countsByYear W20201856562018 @default.
• W2020185656 countsByYear W20201856562019 @default.
• W2020185656 countsByYear W20201856562020 @default.
• W2020185656 countsByYear W20201856562021 @default.
• W2020185656 countsByYear W20201856562022 @default.
• W2020185656 countsByYear W20201856562023 @default.
• W2020185656 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2020185656 hasAuthorship W2020185656A5000007589 @default.
• W2020185656 hasAuthorship W2020185656A5000787211 @default.
• W2020185656 hasAuthorship W2020185656A5008854544 @default.
• W2020185656 hasAuthorship W2020185656A5043085457 @default.
• W2020185656 hasAuthorship W2020185656A5047296614 @default.
• W2020185656 hasAuthorship W2020185656A5064474779 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConcept C156325361 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConcept C2780724011 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConcept C61863361 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConcept C74196892 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConcept C83849319 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConceptScore W2020185656C138496976 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConceptScore W2020185656C144024400 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConceptScore W2020185656C156325361 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConceptScore W2020185656C15744967 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConceptScore W2020185656C159110408 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConceptScore W2020185656C160735492 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConceptScore W2020185656C162324750 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConceptScore W2020185656C1862650 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConceptScore W2020185656C190248442 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConceptScore W2020185656C27415008 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConceptScore W2020185656C2780724011 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConceptScore W2020185656C36289849 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConceptScore W2020185656C50522688 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConceptScore W2020185656C545542383 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConceptScore W2020185656C61863361 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConceptScore W2020185656C71924100 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConceptScore W2020185656C74196892 @default.
• W2020185656 hasConceptScore W2020185656C83849319 @default.
• W2020185656 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2020185656 hasLocation W20201856561 @default.
• W2020185656 hasLocation W20201856562 @default.
• W2020185656 hasOpenAccess W2020185656 @default.
• W2020185656 hasPrimaryLocation W20201856561 @default.
• W2020185656 hasRelatedWork W1763115878 @default.
• W2020185656 hasRelatedWork W1951939026 @default.
• W2020185656 hasRelatedWork W2011769885 @default.
• W2020185656 hasRelatedWork W2147954254 @default.
• W2020185656 hasRelatedWork W2623760453 @default.
• W2020185656 hasRelatedWork W2900044350 @default.
• W2020185656 hasRelatedWork W2973599677 @default.
• W2020185656 hasRelatedWork W3015531300 @default.
• W2020185656 hasRelatedWork W3029476422 @default.
• W2020185656 hasRelatedWork W4238308949 @default.

• next