FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2020234354> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2020234354 endingPage "1180" @default.
• W2020234354 startingPage "1171" @default.
• W2020234354 abstract "Gradient echo (GE) and echo planar imaging (EPI) techniques are two different approaches to functional MRI (fMRI). In contrast to GE sequences, the ultra short EPI technique facilitates fMRI experiments with high spatial and temporal resolution or mapping of the whole brain. Although it has become the method of choice for fMRI, EPI is generally restricted to modern scanners with a strong gradient system. The aim of our study was to evaluate the applicability of EPI for fMRI of the motor cortex using a 1.5 T scanner with a conventional gradient system of 10 mT/m (rise time: 1 ms). Therefore, EPI was compared with a well-established high-resolution fast low-angle shot (FLASH) technique (matrix size 1282). The FLASH technique was applied additionally with a 64(2) matrix size to exclude influences caused by different spatial resolution, because the EPI sequence was restricted to a 64(2) matrix size. A total of 35 healthy volunteers were included in this study. The task consisted of clenching and spreading of the right hand. FLASH and EPI techniques were compared regarding geometric distortions as well as qualitative and quantitative fMRI criteria: Mean signal increase between activation and rest and the area of activation were measured within the contralateral, ipsilateral, and supplementary motor cortex. The quality of subtraction images between activation and rest, as well as the quality of z-maps and time course within activated regions of interest, was evaluated visually. EPI revealed significant distortions of the anterior and posterior brain margins; lateral distortions (relevant for the motor cortex) could be neglected in most cases. The mean signal increase was significantly higher using FLASH 1282 compared to FLASH 64(2) and EPI 64(2), whereas the activated areas proved to be smaller in FLASH 1282 functional images. Both results can be explained by well-documented partial volume effects, caused by different voxel size. Similar quality of the subtraction images and of the time courses in different regions of interest were found for all techniques under investigation, but slightly reduced quality of z-map in FLASH 1282. Within the limits of reproducibility and measurement accuracy, the location of contralateral activation was similar using FLASH and EPI sequences. In conclusion, EPI proved to be a reliable technique for fMRI of the motor cortex, even on an MR scanner with a conventional gradient system." @default.
• W2020234354 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2020234354 creator A5026183777 @default.
• W2020234354 creator A5043367453 @default.
• W2020234354 creator A5044006541 @default.
• W2020234354 creator A5054756289 @default.
• W2020234354 date "1998-12-01" @default.
• W2020234354 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2020234354 title "Functional MRI of the motor cortex using a conventional gradient system: comparison of FLASH and EPI techniques" @default.
• W2020234354 cites W1870348146 @default.
• W2020234354 cites W1964390942 @default.
• W2020234354 cites W1975290352 @default.
• W2020234354 cites W1992301179 @default.
• W2020234354 cites W1995605620 @default.
• W2020234354 cites W2001226935 @default.
• W2020234354 cites W2002389309 @default.
• W2020234354 cites W2005238835 @default.
• W2020234354 cites W2006799769 @default.
• W2020234354 cites W2013713875 @default.
• W2020234354 cites W2017194794 @default.
• W2020234354 cites W2034151448 @default.
• W2020234354 cites W2037945327 @default.
• W2020234354 cites W2057314949 @default.
• W2020234354 cites W2063647875 @default.
• W2020234354 cites W2066375951 @default.
• W2020234354 cites W2068690134 @default.
• W2020234354 cites W2090198804 @default.
• W2020234354 cites W2107229847 @default.
• W2020234354 cites W2126369491 @default.
• W2020234354 cites W2170117095 @default.
• W2020234354 cites W2405241311 @default.
• W2020234354 cites W2948026034 @default.
• W2020234354 cites W759422228 @default.
• W2020234354 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0730-725x(98)00140-4" @default.
• W2020234354 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9858273" @default.
• W2020234354 hasPublicationYear "1998" @default.
• W2020234354 type Work @default.
• W2020234354 sameAs 2020234354 @default.
• W2020234354 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2020234354 countsByYear W20202343542012 @default.
• W2020234354 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2020234354 hasAuthorship W2020234354A5026183777 @default.
• W2020234354 hasAuthorship W2020234354A5043367453 @default.
• W2020234354 hasAuthorship W2020234354A5044006541 @default.
• W2020234354 hasAuthorship W2020234354A5054756289 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConcept C115961682 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConcept C119666444 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConcept C24998067 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConcept C2777526259 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConcept C2778373776 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConcept C2779751349 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConcept C31972630 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConcept C46141821 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConcept C55020928 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConcept C68060419 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConcept C94375191 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConceptScore W2020234354C115961682 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConceptScore W2020234354C119666444 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConceptScore W2020234354C120665830 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConceptScore W2020234354C121332964 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConceptScore W2020234354C154945302 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConceptScore W2020234354C15744967 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConceptScore W2020234354C169760540 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConceptScore W2020234354C24998067 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConceptScore W2020234354C2777526259 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConceptScore W2020234354C2778373776 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConceptScore W2020234354C2779751349 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConceptScore W2020234354C31972630 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConceptScore W2020234354C33923547 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConceptScore W2020234354C41008148 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConceptScore W2020234354C46141821 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConceptScore W2020234354C55020928 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConceptScore W2020234354C68060419 @default.
• W2020234354 hasConceptScore W2020234354C94375191 @default.
• W2020234354 hasIssue "10" @default.
• W2020234354 hasLocation W20202343541 @default.
• W2020234354 hasLocation W20202343542 @default.
• W2020234354 hasOpenAccess W2020234354 @default.
• W2020234354 hasPrimaryLocation W20202343541 @default.
• W2020234354 hasRelatedWork W2015421583 @default.
• W2020234354 hasRelatedWork W2033534994 @default.
• W2020234354 hasRelatedWork W2064588182 @default.
• W2020234354 hasRelatedWork W2096668200 @default.
• W2020234354 hasRelatedWork W2165509409 @default.
• W2020234354 hasRelatedWork W2179301249 @default.
• W2020234354 hasRelatedWork W2292318130 @default.
• W2020234354 hasRelatedWork W2972469486 @default.
• W2020234354 hasRelatedWork W307265996 @default.
• W2020234354 hasRelatedWork W2167041092 @default.
• W2020234354 hasVolume "16" @default.
• W2020234354 isParatext "false" @default.

• next