FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2020295890> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2020295890 endingPage "452" @default.
• W2020295890 startingPage "450" @default.
• W2020295890 abstract "British Journal of Cardiac NursingVol. 7, No. 9 CommentPatient experience as a dimension of quality and nursing practiceRachel Matthews, Jocelyn CornwellRachel MatthewsSearch for more papers by this author, Jocelyn CornwellSearch for more papers by this authorRachel Matthews; Jocelyn CornwellPublished Online:27 Sep 2013https://doi.org/10.12968/bjca.2012.7.9.450AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail View article References Albarran JW, Tagney J, James J (2004) Partners of ICD patients—an exploratory study of their experiences. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 3: 201–210 Crossref, Google ScholarAlmond SC, Salisbury H, Ziebland S (2012) Women's experience of coronary heart disease: why is it diffferent? British Journal of Cardiac Nursing 7(4): 165–70 Link, Google ScholarClaessens P, Moons P, Dierckx de Casterle B, Cannaerts N, Budts W, Gewillig M (2005) What does it mean to live with a congenital heart disease? A qualitative study on the lived experiences of adult patients. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 4: 3–10 Crossref, Google ScholarCoulter A, Fitzpatrick R, Cornwell J (2009) Measures of patients' experience in hospital. Purpose methods and uses. The King's Fund, London Google ScholarDarzi A (2008) High Quality Care for All. NHS Next Stage Review Final Report. The Stationery Office, London Google ScholarDepartment of Health Coronary Heart Disease Policy Team (2009) The Coronary Heart Disease National Service Framework: Building on Excellence, Maintaining Progress. Progress Report for 2008. DH, London Google ScholarDepartment of Health (2010) Transparency in Outcomes—A framework for the NHS. DH, London Google ScholarDepartment of Health (2012a) NHS Patient Experience Framework. http://tinyurl.com/86yktl7 (accessed 21 August 2012) Google ScholarDepartment of Health (2012b) NHS Outcomes Framework 2012/2013. At a glance. http://tinyurl.com/cpasjet (accessed 21 August 2012) Google ScholarDixon A, Foot C, Harrison T for The Kings Fund (2012) Preparing for the Francis report. How to assure quality in the NHS. http://tinyurl.com/cnrzttv (accessed 21 August 2012) Google ScholarDr Foster Intelligence (2010) The Intelligent Board 2010: Patient Experience. http://tinyurl.com/bsqjtcc (accessed 21 August 2012) Google ScholarDunckley M, Ellard D, Quinn T, Barlow J (2007) Recovery after artery bypass grafting: Patients' and health proffessionals' views of the hospital experience. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 6: 200–200 Crossref, Google ScholarGardner G, Elliott D, Gill J, Griffin M, Crawford M (2005) Patient experiences following cardiothoracic surgery: An interview study. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 4: 242–242 Crossref, Google ScholarGoodrich J, Cornwell J (2008) Seeing the Person in the Patient. The Point of Care Review Paper. The King's Fund, London Google ScholarHealthcare Commission (2005) Coronary Heart Disease. Survey of Patients 2004. Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection, London Google ScholarJones S, Rimmer C, Hatchett R (2002) The future of cardiac nursing. In: Hatchett RThompson D, eds, Cardiac Nursing: A comprehensive guide. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh: 585–92 Google ScholarLuxford K, Safran DG, Delbanco T (2011) Promoting patient-centred care: a qualitative study of facilitators and barriers in healthcare organizations with a reputation for improving the patient experience. Int J Qual Healthcare 23: 510–510 Crossref, Google ScholarMackintosh A, Gibbons E, Fitzpatrick R for Patient-reported Outcome Measurement Group, University of Oxford (2009) A Structured Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for People with Heart Failure: An Update 2009. Report for the Department of Health. http://tinyurl.com/c4srsw6 (accessed 21 August 2012) Google ScholarMulley A, Trimble C, Elwyn G (2012) Patients' Preferences Matter. Stop the Silent Misdiagnosis. The King's Fund, London Google ScholarNational Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2012) Patient Experience in Adult NHS Services: Improving the Experience of Care for People Using Adult NHS Services [Clinical guideline138] http://tinyurl.com/c2x8nuu (accessed 21 August 2012) Google ScholarO'Flynn N, Staniszewska S (2012) Improving the experience of care for people using NHS services: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 344: d6422 Crossref, Google ScholarRadcliffe EL, Harding G, Rothman MT, Feder GS (2009) ’It got right to the spot’ The patient experience of primary angioplasty: A qualitative study. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 8: 216–216 Crossref, Google ScholarRaleigh VS, Frosini F, Sizmur S, Graham C (2012) Do some trusts deliver a consistently better experience for patients? An analysis of patient experience across acute care surveys in English NHS trusts. BMJ Qual Saf doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000588 (online ahead of print) Crossref, Google ScholarReeves R, Coulter A, Jenkinson C, Cartwright J, Bruster S, Richards N (2002) Development and Pilot Testing of Questionnaire for Use in the Acute NHS Trust Inpatient Survey Programme. Picker Institute Europe, Oxford Google ScholarRiley J, Habibi H, Banya W, Gatzoulis MA, LauWalker M, Cowie MR (2011) Education and support needs of the older adult with congenital heart disease. J Adv Nurs 68: 1050–1050 Crossref, Google ScholarRobert G, Cornwell J (2011) ‘What Matters to Patients’? Policy Recommendations. A report for the Department of Health and NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement. http://tinyurl.com/cu59y88 (accessed 21 August 2012) Google ScholarRobert G, Cornwell J, Brearley S, et al (2011) ‘What Matters to Patients’? Developing the Evidence Base for Measuring and Improving Patient Experience, Project Report for the Department of Health and NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement http://tinyurl.com/c8f4hsl (accessed 21 August 2012) Google ScholarSociety for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain and Ireland (2011) Maintaining Patients' Trust: Modern Medical Professionalism. Dendrite Clinical Systems Ltd, Henley-on-Thames. Google ScholarStuart-Jones V (2012) Call to arms for cardiovascular nurses: show us the data. British Journal of Cardiac Nursing 7(7): 350–1 Link, Google ScholarWoods P, Williamson C (2011) Measuring patient experience. In: Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain and Ireland; Maintaining Patients' Trust: Modern Medical Professionalism. Dendrite Clinical Systems Ltd, Henley-on-Thames. Google Scholar FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byPatient experiences of cardiac surgery and nursing care: a narrative review6 July 2016 | British Journal of Cardiac Nursing, Vol. 11, No. 7Involving carers makes a difference to outcomes for all27 September 2013 | British Journal of Cardiac Nursing, Vol. 7, No. 10 1 September 2012Volume 7Issue 9ISSN (online): 2052-2207 Metrics History Published online 27 September 2013 Published in print 1 September 2012 Information© MA Healthcare LimitedPDF download" @default.
• W2020295890 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2020295890 creator A5064286604 @default.
• W2020295890 creator A5088133523 @default.
• W2020295890 date "2012-09-01" @default.
• W2020295890 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2020295890 title "Patient experience as a dimension of quality and nursing practice" @default.
• W2020295890 cites W1933003921 @default.
• W2020295890 cites W1970080395 @default.
• W2020295890 cites W1981638130 @default.
• W2020295890 cites W1996165522 @default.
• W2020295890 cites W2009478572 @default.
• W2020295890 cites W2032950270 @default.
• W2020295890 cites W2047452013 @default.
• W2020295890 cites W2059040196 @default.
• W2020295890 cites W2122653091 @default.
• W2020295890 cites W2131181750 @default.
• W2020295890 cites W2133721587 @default.
• W2020295890 cites W2147078591 @default.
• W2020295890 doi "https://doi.org/10.12968/bjca.2012.7.9.450" @default.
• W2020295890 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2020295890 type Work @default.
• W2020295890 sameAs 2020295890 @default.
• W2020295890 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2020295890 countsByYear W20202958902012 @default.
• W2020295890 countsByYear W20202958902016 @default.
• W2020295890 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2020295890 hasAuthorship W2020295890A5064286604 @default.
• W2020295890 hasAuthorship W2020295890A5088133523 @default.
• W2020295890 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2020295890 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2020295890 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2020295890 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2020295890 hasConcept C2777352838 @default.
• W2020295890 hasConcept C2780233690 @default.
• W2020295890 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2020295890 hasConceptScore W2020295890C159110408 @default.
• W2020295890 hasConceptScore W2020295890C160735492 @default.
• W2020295890 hasConceptScore W2020295890C17744445 @default.
• W2020295890 hasConceptScore W2020295890C199539241 @default.
• W2020295890 hasConceptScore W2020295890C2777352838 @default.
• W2020295890 hasConceptScore W2020295890C2780233690 @default.
• W2020295890 hasConceptScore W2020295890C71924100 @default.
• W2020295890 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W2020295890 hasLocation W20202958901 @default.
• W2020295890 hasOpenAccess W2020295890 @default.
• W2020295890 hasPrimaryLocation W20202958901 @default.
• W2020295890 hasRelatedWork W2384169905 @default.
• W2020295890 hasRelatedWork W2390587847 @default.
• W2020295890 hasRelatedWork W2400778086 @default.
• W2020295890 hasRelatedWork W2411244514 @default.
• W2020295890 hasRelatedWork W2539852262 @default.
• W2020295890 hasRelatedWork W268633851 @default.
• W2020295890 hasRelatedWork W2768249048 @default.
• W2020295890 hasRelatedWork W3184784980 @default.
• W2020295890 hasRelatedWork W3199076404 @default.
• W2020295890 hasRelatedWork W4294704033 @default.
• W2020295890 hasVolume "7" @default.
• W2020295890 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2020295890 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2020295890 magId "2020295890" @default.
• W2020295890 workType "article" @default.