FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2020691107> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2020691107 endingPage "1734" @default.
• W2020691107 startingPage "1730" @default.
• W2020691107 abstract "No AccessJournal of UrologyPediatric Urology1 May 1996The Long-Term Outcome of Posterior Urethral Valves Treated with Primary Valve Ablation and Observation Grahame H.H. Smith, Douglas A. Canning, Seth L. Schulman, Howard M. Snyder, and John W. Duckett Grahame H.H. SmithGrahame H.H. Smith More articles by this author , Douglas A. CanningDouglas A. Canning More articles by this author , Seth L. SchulmanSeth L. Schulman More articles by this author , Howard M. SnyderHoward M. Snyder More articles by this author , and John W. DuckettJohn W. Duckett More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66186-XAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Purpose: We believe that primary valve ablation with observation is the preferred management for posterior urethral valves. However, debate continues as to the role of high diversion. We examined the long-term outcome of a large series of patients treated with primary valve ablation, and compared it to the outcome of high diversion and vesicostomy. Materials and Methods: We reviewed the records of 100 patients treated with primary valve ablation (74 percent), vesicostomy (13 percent) or high diversion (9 percent) before 1985. Median followup was 11.2 years. Results: Overall 13 percent of our patients had end stage renal disease by age 15 years. Three patients initially treated with valve ablation and 3 initially treated with vesicostomy later underwent high diversion but none benefited from the secondary procedure. Four patients initially treated with valve ablation subsequently underwent vesicostomy but only 1 benefited. Bladder storage capacity was well preserved. Diurnal urinary continence developed in 46 percent of patients at age 10 years and only 1 remained incontinent after age 20 years. One patient with diversion who awaits transplantation had a small contracted bladder. Recent urodynamic studies in 10 cases of delayed urinary continence have not shown decreased bladder compliance or capacity. Kaplan-Meier analysis of outcomes of the different treatments indicated no statistical difference in patient age at end stage renal disease development. However, comparing the number of surgical procedures in the different treatment groups revealed a significant increase in the amount of surgery in infants with diversion. Our results were equivalent to those of the best published series, many of which strongly advocate high diversion. Conclusions: By avoiding diversion in most cases bladder function is preserved and the need for bladder augmentation is decreased. References 1 : Current management of posterior urethral valves. Urol. Clin. N. Amer1974; 1: 471. Google Scholar 2 : Growth in boys and posterior urethral valves. Primary valve resection vs. upper tract diversion. Urol. Clin. N. Amer1980; 7: 265. Google Scholar 3 : Posterior urethral valves in boys: a broad clinical spectrum. J. Urol1971; 106: 298. Link, Google Scholar 4 : Cutaneous vesicostomy in infants and children: the Blockson technique. Urol. Clin. N. Amer1974; 1: 485. Google Scholar 5 : Temporary cutaneous ureterostomy in the management of advanced congenital urinary obstruction. Arch. Dis. Child1963; 38: 161. Google Scholar 6 : Prognostic features in infants with obstructive uropathy due to posterior urethral valves. J. Urol1985; 133: 240. Link, Google Scholar 7 : Management of congenital posterior urethral valves. Brit. J. Urol1985; 57: 71. Google Scholar 8 : Predictors of eventual end stage renal disease in children with posterior urethral valves. J. Urol1986; 136: 857. Link, Google Scholar 9 : Long-term outcome of boys with posterior urethral valves. Brit. J. Urol1988; 62: 59. Google Scholar 10 : Long-term urinary continence and renal function in neonates with posterior urethral valves. J. Urol1990; 144: 1209. Link, Google Scholar 11 : The management of posterior urethral valves by initial vesicostomy and delayed valve ablation. J. Urol1990; 144: 1212. Link, Google Scholar 12 : Radiographic and serologic correlates of azotemia in patients with posterior urethral valves. J. Urol1992; 148: 1499. Link, Google Scholar 13 : Influence of initial therapy on progression of renal failure and body growth in children with posterior urethral valves. J. Urol1992; 148: 532. Link, Google Scholar 14 : Development of renal control of salt and fluid homeostasis during the first year of life. Acta Paed. Scand1975; 64: 393. Google Scholar 15 : Emergency treatment and long-term followup of posterior urethral valves. Urol. Clin. N. Amer1990; 17: 343. Google Scholar 16 : Anomalies of the urethra. In: . Edited by . Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co.1979: 1646. Google Scholar 17 : Observations on persistantly dilated ureter after posterior urethral valve ablation. Urology1982; 20: 20. Google Scholar 18 : The ureter in posterior urethral valves. Brit. J. Urol1973; 45: 395. Google Scholar 19 : Complications of ureterostomy. J. Urol1978; 120: 269. Link, Google Scholar 20 : Congenitally obstructed bladders: fate after prolonged defunctionalization. J. Urol1974; 111: 102. Link, Google Scholar 21 : Urinary tract re-functionalization after long-term diversion. A 20-year experience with 177 patients. Ann. Surg1990; 212: 478. Google Scholar 22 : Ureteral bladder augmentation. J. Urol1993; 150: 716. Link, Google Scholar 23 : Augmentation cystoplasty in boys with posterior urethral valves. J. Urol1994; 154: 874. Google Scholar 24 : Posterior urethral valves managed by cutaneous ureterostomy with subsequent ureteral reconstruction. J. Urol1978; 119: 696. Link, Google Scholar 25 : Cutaneous vesicostomy in the young child: indications and results. Urology1993; 41: 558. Google Scholar 26 : Posterior urethral valves: a study of urinary control after operation. J. Urol1972; 108: 167. Link, Google Scholar Department of Urology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.© 1996 by American Urological Association, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byShukla A and Kolon T (2022) Douglas Arthur Canning: A TributeJournal of Urology, VOL. 208, NO. 3, (522-525), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2022.Wu C, Traore E, Patil D, Blum E, Cerwinka W, Elmore J, Kirsch A, Scherz H and Smith E (2021) Role of a Preoperative Catheter Regimen in Achieving Early Primary Endoscopic Valve Ablation in Neonates with Posterior Urethral ValvesJournal of Urology, VOL. 205, NO. 6, (1792-1797), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2021.Jalkanen J, Heikkilä J, Kyrklund K and Taskinen S (2016) Controlled Outcomes for Achievement of Urinary Continence among Boys Treated for Posterior Urethral ValvesJournal of Urology, VOL. 196, NO. 1, (213-218), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2016.Christman M, Canning D, Schast A, Baluarte H and Kaplan B (2013) Renal Transplantation into a Diverted Urinary System—Is it Safe in Children?Journal of Urology, VOL. 190, NO. 2, (678-682), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2013.Fine M, Smith K, Shrivastava D, Cook M and Shukla A (2011) Posterior Urethral Valve Treatments and Outcomes in Children Receiving Kidney TransplantsJournal of Urology, VOL. 185, NO. 6S, (2507-2511), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2011.Deshpande A, Alsaywid B and Smith G (2011) Setting the Speed Limit: A Pilot Study of the Rate of Serum Creatinine Decrease After Endoscopic Valve Ablation in NeonatesJournal of Urology, VOL. 185, NO. 6S, (2497-2501), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2011.Sarhan O, El-Ghoneimi A, Helmy T, Dawaba M, Ghali A and Ibrahiem E (2011) Posterior Urethral Valves: Multivariate Analysis of Factors Affecting the Final Renal OutcomeJournal of Urology, VOL. 185, NO. 6S, (2491-2496), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2011.Ansari M, Surdas R, Barai S, Srivastava A and Kapoor R (2011) Renal Function Reserve in Children With Posterior Urethral Valve: A Novel Test to Predict Long-Term OutcomeJournal of Urology, VOL. 185, NO. 6, (2329-2333), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2011.Tikkinen K, Heikkilä J, Rintala R, Tammela T and Taskinen S (2011) Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Adults Treated for Posterior Urethral Valves in Childhood: Matched Cohort StudyJournal of Urology, VOL. 186, NO. 2, (660-666), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2011.Heikkilä J, Holmberg C, Kyllönen L, Rintala R and Taskinen S (2011) Long-Term Risk of End Stage Renal Disease in Patients With Posterior Urethral ValvesJournal of Urology, VOL. 186, NO. 6, (2392-2396), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2011.Snyder H (2009) Editorial CommentJournal of Urology, VOL. 182, NO. 2, (702-703), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2009.Heikkilä J, Rintala R and Taskinen S (2009) Vesicoureteral Reflux in Conjunction With Posterior Urethral ValvesJournal of Urology, VOL. 182, NO. 4, (1555-1560), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2009.DeFoor W, Clark C, Jackson E, Reddy P, Minevich E and Sheldon C (2008) Risk Factors for End Stage Renal Disease in Children With Posterior Urethral ValvesJournal of Urology, VOL. 180, NO. 4S, (1705-1708), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2008.Kajbafzadeh A, Payabvash S and Karimian G (2007) The Effects of Bladder Neck Incision on Urodynamic Abnormalities of Children With Posterior Urethral ValvesJournal of Urology, VOL. 178, NO. 5, (2142-2149), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2007.Bani Hani O, Prelog K and Smith G (2018) A Method to Assess Posterior Urethral Valve AblationJournal of Urology, VOL. 176, NO. 1, (303-305), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2006.BAJPAI M, PRATAP A, TRIPATHI M and BAL C (2018) POSTERIOR URETHRAL VALVES: PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS ON THE SIGNIFICANCE OF PLASMA RENIN ACTIVITY AS A PROGNOSTIC MARKERJournal of Urology, VOL. 173, NO. 2, (592-594), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2005.GHANEM M and NIJMAN R (2018) LONG-TERM FOLLOWUP OF BILATERAL HIGH (SOBER) URINARY DIVERSION IN PATIENTS WITH POSTERIOR URETHRAL VALVES AND ITS EFFECT ON BLADDER FUNCTIONJournal of Urology, VOL. 173, NO. 5, (1721-1724), Online publication date: 1-May-2005.HOLMDAHL G and SILLÉN U (2018) BOYS WITH POSTERIOR URETHRAL VALVES: OUTCOME CONCERNING RENAL FUNCTION, BLADDER FUNCTION AND PATERNITY AT AGES 31 TO 44 YEARSJournal of Urology, VOL. 174, NO. 3, (1031-1034), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2005.HOFMANN R, BECKER T, MEYER-WITTKOPF M, TEKESIN I, SIERRA F and SCHMIDT S (2018) Fetoscopic Placement of a Transurethral Stent for Intrauterine Obstructive UropathyJournal of Urology, VOL. 171, NO. 1, (384-386), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2004.NARASIMHAN K, KAUR B, CHOWDHARY S and BHALLA A (2018) DOES MODE OF TREATMENT AFFECT THE OUTCOME OF NEONATAL POSTERIOR URETHRAL VALVES?Journal of Urology, VOL. 171, NO. 6 Part 1, (2423-2426), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2004.PONSKY L, CHERULLO E, BANKS K and ROSS J (2018) LAPAROSCOPIC TRANSUTERINE FETAL VESICOSTOMY: A FEASIBILITY STUDYJournal of Urology, VOL. 172, NO. 6 Part 1, (2391-2394), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2004.DeFOOR W, TACKETT L, MINEVICH E, McENERY P, KITCHENS D, REEVES D and SHELDON C (2018) Successful Renal Transplantation in Children With Posterior Urethral ValvesJournal of Urology, VOL. 170, NO. 6, (2402-2404), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2003.Podestá M, Ruarte A, Gargiulo C, Medel R, Castera R and Herrera M (2018) Bladder Function Associated With Posterior Urethral Valves After Primary Valve Ablation or Proximal Urinary Diversion in Children and AdolescentsJournal of Urology, VOL. 168, NO. 4 Part 2, (1830-1835), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2002.El-Sherbiny M, Hafez A and Ghoneim M (2018) Ureteroneocystostomy in Children with Posterior Urethral Valves: Indications and OutcomeJournal of Urology, VOL. 168, NO. 4 Part 2, (1836-1840), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2002.KOFF S, MUTABAGANI K and JAYANTHI V (2018) THE VALVE BLADDER SYNDROME: PATHOPHYSIOLOGY AND TREATMENT WITH NOCTURNAL BLADDER EMPTYINGJournal of Urology, VOL. 167, NO. 1, (291-297), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2002.GLASSBERG K (2018) THE VALVE BLADDER SYNDROME: 20 YEARS LATERJournal of Urology, VOL. 166, NO. 4, (1406-1414), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2001.GHALI A, EL MALKI T, SHEIR K, ASHMALLAH A and MOHSEN T (2018) POSTERIOR URETHRAL VALVES WITH PERSISTENT HIGH SERUM CREATININE: THE VALUE OF PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROSTOMYJournal of Urology, VOL. 164, NO. 4, (1340-1344), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2000.MACHADO M, YOO J and ATALA A (2018) DEFUNCTIONALIZED BLADDERS: EFFECTS BEFORE AND AFTER REFUNCTIONALIZATION IN AN ANIMAL MODELJournal of Urology, VOL. 164, NO. 3 Part 2, (1002-1007), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2000.JAUREGUIZAR E, LOPEZ PEREIRA P, MARTINEZ URRUTIA M, ESPINOSA L and LOBATO R (2018) DOES NEONATAL PYELOURETEROSTOMY WORSEN BLADDER FUNCTION IN CHILDREN WITH POSTERIOR URETHRAL VALVES?Journal of Urology, VOL. 164, NO. 3 Part 2, (1031-1034), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2000.PODESTÁ M, RUARTE A, GARGIULO C, MEDEL R and CASTERA R (2018) URODYNAMIC FINDINGS IN BOYS WITH POSTERIOR URETHRAL VALVES AFTER TREATMENT WITH PRIMARY VALVE ABLATION OR VESICOSTOMY AND DELAYED ABLATIONJournal of Urology, VOL. 164, NO. 1, (139-144), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2000.LIARD A, SEGUIER-LIPSZYC E and MITROFANOFF P (2018) TEMPORARY HIGH DIVERSION FOR POSTERIOR URETHRAL VALVESJournal of Urology, VOL. 164, NO. 1, (145-148), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2000.BOMALASKI M, ANEMA J, COPLEN D, KOO H, ROZANSKI T and BLOOM D (2018) DELAYED PRESENTATION OF POSTERIOR URETHRAL VALVES: A NOT SO BENIGN CONDITIONJournal of Urology, VOL. 162, NO. 6, (2130-2132), Online publication date: 1-Dec-1999.EL-GHONEIMI A, DESGRIPPES A, LUTON D, MACHER M, GUIBOURDENCHE J, GAREL C, MULLER F, VUILLARD E, LOTTMANN H, NESSMANN C, OURY J and AIGRAIN Y (2018) OUTCOME OF POSTERIOR URETHRAL VALVES: TO WHAT EXTENT IS IT IMPROVED BY PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS?Journal of Urology, VOL. 162, NO. 3 Part 1, (849-853), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1999.BROCK J, HUNLEY T, ADAMS M and KON V (2018) ROLE OF THE RENIN-ANGIOTENSIN SYSTEM IN DISORDERS OF THE URINARY TRACTJournal of Urology, VOL. 160, NO. 5, (1812-1819), Online publication date: 1-Nov-1998.INDUDHARA R, JOSEPH D, PEREZ L and DIETHELM A (2018) RENAL TRANSPLANTATION IN CHILDREN WITH POSTERIOR URETHRAL VALVES REVISITED: A 10-YEAR FOLLOWUPJournal of Urology, VOL. 160, NO. 3 Part 2, (1201-1203), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1998.Warady B, Fivush B and Morgenstern B (2018) REPORT OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY MEETINGSJournal of Urology, VOL. 159, NO. 2, (516-520), Online publication date: 1-Feb-1998.Tietjen D, Gloor J and Husmann D (2018) Proximal Urinary Diversion in the Management of Posterior Urethral Valves: Is it Necessary?Journal of Urology, VOL. 158, NO. 3, (1008-1010), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1997.Rohrmann D, Monson F, Damaser M, Levin R, Duckett J and Zderic S (2018) Partial Bladder Outlet Obstruction in the Fetal RabbitJournal of Urology, VOL. 158, NO. 3, (1071-1074), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1997.Close C, Carr M, Burns M and Mitchell M (2018) Lower Urinary Tract Changes After Early Valve Ablation In Neonates and Infants: Is Early Diversion Warranted?Journal of Urology, VOL. 157, NO. 3, (984-988), Online publication date: 1-Mar-1997.Greenfield S (2018) Editorial: Posterior Urethral Valves-New ConceptsJournal of Urology, VOL. 157, NO. 3, (996-997), Online publication date: 1-Mar-1997. Volume 155Issue 5May 1996Page: 1730-1734 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 1996 by American Urological Association, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Grahame H.H. Smith More articles by this author Douglas A. Canning More articles by this author Seth L. Schulman More articles by this author Howard M. Snyder More articles by this author John W. Duckett More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ..." @default.
• W2020691107 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2020691107 creator A5009374422 @default.
• W2020691107 creator A5015176593 @default.
• W2020691107 creator A5023083440 @default.
• W2020691107 creator A5028519941 @default.
• W2020691107 creator A5038634685 @default.
• W2020691107 date "1996-05-01" @default.
• W2020691107 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W2020691107 title "The Long-Term Outcome of Posterior Urethral Valves Treated with Primary Valve Ablation and Observation" @default.
• W2020691107 cites W136638100 @default.
• W2020691107 cites W1967985621 @default.
• W2020691107 cites W1969324184 @default.
• W2020691107 cites W2028942007 @default.
• W2020691107 cites W2072256192 @default.
• W2020691107 cites W2075912201 @default.
• W2020691107 cites W2082575942 @default.
• W2020691107 cites W2085368226 @default.
• W2020691107 cites W2122443905 @default.
• W2020691107 cites W2403914036 @default.
• W2020691107 cites W2404958043 @default.
• W2020691107 cites W2406051180 @default.
• W2020691107 cites W2408274893 @default.
• W2020691107 cites W2408397438 @default.
• W2020691107 cites W2411644400 @default.
• W2020691107 cites W2412465108 @default.
• W2020691107 cites W2412805451 @default.
• W2020691107 cites W2416175545 @default.
• W2020691107 cites W2423314486 @default.
• W2020691107 cites W2526788269 @default.
• W2020691107 cites W2726321750 @default.
• W2020691107 cites W63126908 @default.
• W2020691107 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)66186-x" @default.
• W2020691107 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8627873" @default.
• W2020691107 hasPublicationYear "1996" @default.
• W2020691107 type Work @default.
• W2020691107 sameAs 2020691107 @default.
• W2020691107 citedByCount "216" @default.
• W2020691107 countsByYear W20206911072012 @default.
• W2020691107 countsByYear W20206911072013 @default.
• W2020691107 countsByYear W20206911072014 @default.
• W2020691107 countsByYear W20206911072015 @default.
• W2020691107 countsByYear W20206911072016 @default.
• W2020691107 countsByYear W20206911072017 @default.
• W2020691107 countsByYear W20206911072018 @default.
• W2020691107 countsByYear W20206911072019 @default.
• W2020691107 countsByYear W20206911072020 @default.
• W2020691107 countsByYear W20206911072021 @default.
• W2020691107 countsByYear W20206911072022 @default.
• W2020691107 countsByYear W20206911072023 @default.
• W2020691107 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2020691107 hasAuthorship W2020691107A5009374422 @default.
• W2020691107 hasAuthorship W2020691107A5015176593 @default.
• W2020691107 hasAuthorship W2020691107A5023083440 @default.
• W2020691107 hasAuthorship W2020691107A5028519941 @default.
• W2020691107 hasAuthorship W2020691107A5038634685 @default.
• W2020691107 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2020691107 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2020691107 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W2020691107 hasConcept C2778902805 @default.
• W2020691107 hasConcept C61797465 @default.
• W2020691107 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2020691107 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2020691107 hasConceptScore W2020691107C121332964 @default.
• W2020691107 hasConceptScore W2020691107C141071460 @default.
• W2020691107 hasConceptScore W2020691107C164705383 @default.
• W2020691107 hasConceptScore W2020691107C2778902805 @default.
• W2020691107 hasConceptScore W2020691107C61797465 @default.
• W2020691107 hasConceptScore W2020691107C62520636 @default.
• W2020691107 hasConceptScore W2020691107C71924100 @default.
• W2020691107 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2020691107 hasLocation W20206911071 @default.
• W2020691107 hasLocation W20206911072 @default.
• W2020691107 hasOpenAccess W2020691107 @default.
• W2020691107 hasPrimaryLocation W20206911071 @default.
• W2020691107 hasRelatedWork W113810927 @default.
• W2020691107 hasRelatedWork W1586374228 @default.
• W2020691107 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W2020691107 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W2020691107 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W2020691107 hasRelatedWork W2364998975 @default.
• W2020691107 hasRelatedWork W2369162477 @default.
• W2020691107 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W2020691107 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
• W2020691107 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
• W2020691107 hasVolume "155" @default.
• W2020691107 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2020691107 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2020691107 magId "2020691107" @default.
• W2020691107 workType "article" @default.