Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2020773523> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2020773523 endingPage "142" @default.
- W2020773523 startingPage "136" @default.
- W2020773523 abstract "Background: The Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Outcomes Project has endorsed the in-training examination (ITE) as an example of a multiple-choice question examination that is a valid measure of a resident's attainment of medical knowledge. An outcome measure for performance on the ITE would be the subsequent performance on the board certification examination. However, there are few reports that attempt to correlate a resident's performance on the ITE to subsequent performance on the board certification examination. Purpose: The Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology (CREOG) has administered the ITE annually since 1970. This study tested the hypothesis that the CREOG–ITE score is a valid assessment tool to predict performance on the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ABOG) written examination. Methods: CREOG–ITE and ABOG written board examination results were collected for 69 resident graduates between the years 1998 and 2005. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to estimate the relationship between a resident's score on the CREOG–ITE and subsequent performance on the ABOG written examination. Results: Fifty-seven resident graduates passed (82.6%) and 12 graduates failed (17.4%) the ABOG written examination. The correlation between the CREOG–ITE overall score and performance on the ABOG examination was weak (correlation coefficient =.38, p =.001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis for the CREOG–ITE overall scores and the probability of passing or failing the ABOG examination revealed moderate accuracy (area under the curve = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.62–0.92) with a CREOG–ITE score of 187.5 yielding the best trade-off between specificity (0.79) and sensitivity (0.75). At the cutoff value of 187.5 there was a weak positive predictive value of 43% (i.e., 43% of residents with a score less than 187.5 will fail the ABOG exam) and a strong negative predictive value of 94% (i.e., 94% of the residents with a score above 187.5 will pass the ABOG exam). Logistic regression analysis also revealed a statistically significant relationship between the CREOG–ITE overall score and performance on the ABOG written examination (p = .003). Conclusions: Similar to other specialties, resident performance on the CREOG–ITE is a weak assessment tool to predict the probability of a resident failing the ABOG written examination. Our study highlights the need, in the spirit of the ACGME Outcome Project, for residency and board specialty organizations to coordinate efforts to develop more reliable and correlative measures of a resident's medical knowledge and ability to pass the boards." @default.
- W2020773523 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2020773523 creator A5018179377 @default.
- W2020773523 creator A5059711716 @default.
- W2020773523 date "2008-04-08" @default.
- W2020773523 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
- W2020773523 title "Resident Performance on the In-Training and Board Examinations in Obstetrics and Gynecology: Implications for the ACGME Outcome Project" @default.
- W2020773523 cites W1971516879 @default.
- W2020773523 cites W1972713431 @default.
- W2020773523 cites W1975816034 @default.
- W2020773523 cites W1979433420 @default.
- W2020773523 cites W1988718397 @default.
- W2020773523 cites W1988784680 @default.
- W2020773523 cites W1991488650 @default.
- W2020773523 cites W2002776657 @default.
- W2020773523 cites W2014466251 @default.
- W2020773523 cites W2019974714 @default.
- W2020773523 cites W2039206463 @default.
- W2020773523 cites W2051685441 @default.
- W2020773523 cites W2073427682 @default.
- W2020773523 cites W2079639730 @default.
- W2020773523 cites W2093779865 @default.
- W2020773523 cites W2114607992 @default.
- W2020773523 cites W2118732768 @default.
- W2020773523 cites W2134510288 @default.
- W2020773523 cites W2152835841 @default.
- W2020773523 cites W2154287404 @default.
- W2020773523 cites W2161750491 @default.
- W2020773523 cites W2164142597 @default.
- W2020773523 cites W2328856234 @default.
- W2020773523 cites W27561109 @default.
- W2020773523 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/10401330801991642" @default.
- W2020773523 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18444200" @default.
- W2020773523 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
- W2020773523 type Work @default.
- W2020773523 sameAs 2020773523 @default.
- W2020773523 citedByCount "25" @default.
- W2020773523 countsByYear W20207735232012 @default.
- W2020773523 countsByYear W20207735232013 @default.
- W2020773523 countsByYear W20207735232014 @default.
- W2020773523 countsByYear W20207735232015 @default.
- W2020773523 countsByYear W20207735232016 @default.
- W2020773523 countsByYear W20207735232017 @default.
- W2020773523 countsByYear W20207735232018 @default.
- W2020773523 countsByYear W20207735232019 @default.
- W2020773523 countsByYear W20207735232020 @default.
- W2020773523 countsByYear W20207735232021 @default.
- W2020773523 countsByYear W20207735232022 @default.
- W2020773523 countsByYear W20207735232023 @default.
- W2020773523 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2020773523 hasAuthorship W2020773523A5018179377 @default.
- W2020773523 hasAuthorship W2020773523A5059711716 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConcept C10885799 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConcept C22156102 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConcept C2776474047 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConcept C2778000598 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConcept C2779741528 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConcept C2779767262 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConcept C2988064887 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConcept C2993838110 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConcept C3019285220 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConcept C46304622 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConcept C47177190 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConcept C527108885 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConcept C58471807 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConcept C61521584 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConceptScore W2020773523C10885799 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConceptScore W2020773523C126322002 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConceptScore W2020773523C151730666 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConceptScore W2020773523C151956035 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConceptScore W2020773523C15744967 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConceptScore W2020773523C162324750 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConceptScore W2020773523C187736073 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConceptScore W2020773523C19417346 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConceptScore W2020773523C22156102 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConceptScore W2020773523C2776474047 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConceptScore W2020773523C2777267654 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConceptScore W2020773523C2778000598 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConceptScore W2020773523C2779234561 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConceptScore W2020773523C2779741528 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConceptScore W2020773523C2779767262 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConceptScore W2020773523C2988064887 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConceptScore W2020773523C2993838110 @default.
- W2020773523 hasConceptScore W2020773523C3019285220 @default.