FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2020797776> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2020797776 endingPage "316" @default.
• W2020797776 startingPage "310" @default.
• W2020797776 abstract "Considerable interest has been shown in the plaque removal properties of modern toothbrush designs. The primary aim of the study was to compare the plaque removal properties of 8 relatively recent designs of manual toothbrush using a professional tooth brusher and within a commonly used time frame. A secondary aim was established to utilise the data to observationally appraise plaque accumulation together with the patterns of removal as a consequence of using the timed professional tooth brusher.The method was an 8-period, single-examiner, randomized, blind cross-over study involving 24 healthy volunteers, balanced for residual effects. Subjects accumulated plaque over a 4 day no oral hygiene period. On day 4, the accumulated plaque was scored by plaque index at the mesial, mid and distal sites of each of the buccal and lingual surfaces of the assessed teeth. Subjects were then removed from the assessment area where they received a professional brushing timed to last 48 s. Brushing was completed according to pre-study training without toothpaste and was followed by a re-scoring of the remaining plaque. A washout period of 3 days was then allowed prior to the next period during which normal oral hygiene was resumed.Similar quantities of plaque accumulated in each arch, although the difference between the buccal and lingual surfaces was of the order of 30%. The professional toothbrusher removed approximately 40% of the accumulated plaque in the 48 s allocated. The buccal surfaces were most effectively cleaned (approximately 45%) compared with the lingual (approximately 25%), with the plaque removal in the mesial and mid sections approaching 40% and 60% respectively. The difference in performance between the test brushes corresponded to 5% of the residual plaque values with none being significantly more efficient overall. Pair wise site comparisons did produce differences of the order of 10% (p=0.004) at the mesio-buccal, and 8% (p=0.030) at the mid-buccal sites respectively in favour of 2 brushes compared to one other brush.These data derived from a standardized brushing method support the contention of many researchers that there is no one superior design of manual toothbrush. The minor and few site differences in favour of some brushes are unlikely to be of clinical significance to gingival health. This leaves uncontested the conclusion that the user is by far the most significant variable. Perhaps methods such as used in the present study could be more gainly employed to set a minimum standard of toothbrush efficacy." @default.
• W2020797776 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2020797776 creator A5009494587 @default.
• W2020797776 creator A5032021245 @default.
• W2020797776 creator A5054014415 @default.
• W2020797776 creator A5055162767 @default.
• W2020797776 creator A5064168690 @default.
• W2020797776 date "2002-04-01" @default.
• W2020797776 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2020797776 title "Comparative professional plaque removal study using 8 branded toothbrushes" @default.
• W2020797776 cites W1765278993 @default.
• W2020797776 cites W2001776370 @default.
• W2020797776 cites W2025691877 @default.
• W2020797776 cites W2038750065 @default.
• W2020797776 cites W2054068403 @default.
• W2020797776 cites W2055894224 @default.
• W2020797776 cites W2060888221 @default.
• W2020797776 cites W2066742923 @default.
• W2020797776 cites W2105999147 @default.
• W2020797776 cites W2114986667 @default.
• W2020797776 cites W2116709656 @default.
• W2020797776 cites W2158201626 @default.
• W2020797776 cites W2407715393 @default.
• W2020797776 cites W4255517573 @default.
• W2020797776 doi "https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.290406.x" @default.
• W2020797776 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11966928" @default.
• W2020797776 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W2020797776 type Work @default.
• W2020797776 sameAs 2020797776 @default.
• W2020797776 citedByCount "26" @default.
• W2020797776 countsByYear W20207977762012 @default.
• W2020797776 countsByYear W20207977762014 @default.
• W2020797776 countsByYear W20207977762018 @default.
• W2020797776 countsByYear W20207977762019 @default.
• W2020797776 countsByYear W20207977762021 @default.
• W2020797776 countsByYear W20207977762022 @default.
• W2020797776 countsByYear W20207977762023 @default.
• W2020797776 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2020797776 hasAuthorship W2020797776A5009494587 @default.
• W2020797776 hasAuthorship W2020797776A5032021245 @default.
• W2020797776 hasAuthorship W2020797776A5054014415 @default.
• W2020797776 hasAuthorship W2020797776A5055162767 @default.
• W2020797776 hasAuthorship W2020797776A5064168690 @default.
• W2020797776 hasConcept C119599485 @default.
• W2020797776 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2020797776 hasConcept C156887251 @default.
• W2020797776 hasConcept C16108499 @default.
• W2020797776 hasConcept C195735259 @default.
• W2020797776 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2020797776 hasConcept C2777892068 @default.
• W2020797776 hasConcept C2779914569 @default.
• W2020797776 hasConcept C2781031783 @default.
• W2020797776 hasConcept C2909948168 @default.
• W2020797776 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2020797776 hasConcept C515851188 @default.
• W2020797776 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2020797776 hasConceptScore W2020797776C119599485 @default.
• W2020797776 hasConceptScore W2020797776C127413603 @default.
• W2020797776 hasConceptScore W2020797776C156887251 @default.
• W2020797776 hasConceptScore W2020797776C16108499 @default.
• W2020797776 hasConceptScore W2020797776C195735259 @default.
• W2020797776 hasConceptScore W2020797776C199343813 @default.
• W2020797776 hasConceptScore W2020797776C2777892068 @default.
• W2020797776 hasConceptScore W2020797776C2779914569 @default.
• W2020797776 hasConceptScore W2020797776C2781031783 @default.
• W2020797776 hasConceptScore W2020797776C2909948168 @default.
• W2020797776 hasConceptScore W2020797776C29694066 @default.
• W2020797776 hasConceptScore W2020797776C515851188 @default.
• W2020797776 hasConceptScore W2020797776C71924100 @default.
• W2020797776 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2020797776 hasLocation W20207977761 @default.
• W2020797776 hasLocation W20207977762 @default.
• W2020797776 hasOpenAccess W2020797776 @default.
• W2020797776 hasPrimaryLocation W20207977761 @default.
• W2020797776 hasRelatedWork W1601493422 @default.
• W2020797776 hasRelatedWork W184100793 @default.
• W2020797776 hasRelatedWork W1973151543 @default.
• W2020797776 hasRelatedWork W2020797776 @default.
• W2020797776 hasRelatedWork W2108008740 @default.
• W2020797776 hasRelatedWork W2131891854 @default.
• W2020797776 hasRelatedWork W2602235557 @default.
• W2020797776 hasRelatedWork W2947573980 @default.
• W2020797776 hasRelatedWork W3177475439 @default.
• W2020797776 hasRelatedWork W2463484977 @default.
• W2020797776 hasVolume "29" @default.
• W2020797776 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2020797776 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2020797776 magId "2020797776" @default.
• W2020797776 workType "article" @default.