Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2021034169> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 81 of
81
with 100 items per page.
- W2021034169 endingPage "308" @default.
- W2021034169 startingPage "286" @default.
- W2021034169 abstract "The decade of the 1990s can be marked as one of major dissension, conflict, and change within federal corrections for women in Canada. In this article, the authors reflect back on this period of time by examining the correctional ideologies, policies, and practices that were operating in the Canadian federal prison for women. Finding these policies and practices to be inherently gendered and punitive in nature, it is argued that punishment was at the time and continues to be the cornerstone of the regulation of women prisoners, and that it takes a specific, gendered form that relies on the deployment of traditional patriarchal conceptions of femininity. Drawing on interviews with correctional personnel and analyses of correctional policies and the Arbour Inquiry transcripts, this article reconstructs Correctional Service of Canada’s (CSC) responses to incarcerated women’s “unfeminine” behavior, specifically women’s self-harming behavior and their violence against others, as overly disciplinary. It is proposed that CSC’s ideological foundation, as well as the practices and policies that were operating both at the time of and following the incident at the Kingston Prison for Women that resulted in the Arbour Inquiry, remain deeply entrenched in an oppressive hierarchical structure of gender inequality. This structure fails to question how traditional conceptions of femininity shape policies and practices. It has also aided in the construction of a new genre of “misbehaved” women in corrections, which in turn has been used to justify the harsh regulatory treatment of federally sentenced women. Without challenging its traditional gender ideologies, CSC is unable to offer any alternatives to its punitive practices, which continue to operate." @default.
- W2021034169 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2021034169 creator A5044378251 @default.
- W2021034169 creator A5051946035 @default.
- W2021034169 creator A5087380830 @default.
- W2021034169 date "2009-07-08" @default.
- W2021034169 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W2021034169 title "Looking Back 10 Years After the Arbour Inquiry" @default.
- W2021034169 cites W1979402293 @default.
- W2021034169 cites W2076676722 @default.
- W2021034169 cites W2147279908 @default.
- W2021034169 cites W2152284149 @default.
- W2021034169 cites W2153007067 @default.
- W2021034169 cites W2338395596 @default.
- W2021034169 cites W3124075163 @default.
- W2021034169 cites W4236029103 @default.
- W2021034169 cites W4250114882 @default.
- W2021034169 cites W51829888 @default.
- W2021034169 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885509339506" @default.
- W2021034169 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
- W2021034169 type Work @default.
- W2021034169 sameAs 2021034169 @default.
- W2021034169 citedByCount "23" @default.
- W2021034169 countsByYear W20210341692012 @default.
- W2021034169 countsByYear W20210341692013 @default.
- W2021034169 countsByYear W20210341692015 @default.
- W2021034169 countsByYear W20210341692016 @default.
- W2021034169 countsByYear W20210341692017 @default.
- W2021034169 countsByYear W20210341692019 @default.
- W2021034169 countsByYear W20210341692020 @default.
- W2021034169 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2021034169 hasAuthorship W2021034169A5044378251 @default.
- W2021034169 hasAuthorship W2021034169A5051946035 @default.
- W2021034169 hasAuthorship W2021034169A5087380830 @default.
- W2021034169 hasConcept C107993555 @default.
- W2021034169 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2021034169 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2021034169 hasConcept C158071213 @default.
- W2021034169 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2021034169 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2021034169 hasConcept C2777688943 @default.
- W2021034169 hasConcept C2778868352 @default.
- W2021034169 hasConcept C2779295839 @default.
- W2021034169 hasConcept C2780656516 @default.
- W2021034169 hasConcept C73484699 @default.
- W2021034169 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W2021034169 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W2021034169 hasConceptScore W2021034169C107993555 @default.
- W2021034169 hasConceptScore W2021034169C144024400 @default.
- W2021034169 hasConceptScore W2021034169C15744967 @default.
- W2021034169 hasConceptScore W2021034169C158071213 @default.
- W2021034169 hasConceptScore W2021034169C17744445 @default.
- W2021034169 hasConceptScore W2021034169C199539241 @default.
- W2021034169 hasConceptScore W2021034169C2777688943 @default.
- W2021034169 hasConceptScore W2021034169C2778868352 @default.
- W2021034169 hasConceptScore W2021034169C2779295839 @default.
- W2021034169 hasConceptScore W2021034169C2780656516 @default.
- W2021034169 hasConceptScore W2021034169C73484699 @default.
- W2021034169 hasConceptScore W2021034169C77805123 @default.
- W2021034169 hasConceptScore W2021034169C94625758 @default.
- W2021034169 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2021034169 hasLocation W20210341691 @default.
- W2021034169 hasOpenAccess W2021034169 @default.
- W2021034169 hasPrimaryLocation W20210341691 @default.
- W2021034169 hasRelatedWork W1537687061 @default.
- W2021034169 hasRelatedWork W1968045500 @default.
- W2021034169 hasRelatedWork W1973525777 @default.
- W2021034169 hasRelatedWork W2013567378 @default.
- W2021034169 hasRelatedWork W2076088247 @default.
- W2021034169 hasRelatedWork W2084016344 @default.
- W2021034169 hasRelatedWork W2120093117 @default.
- W2021034169 hasRelatedWork W4235493931 @default.
- W2021034169 hasRelatedWork W4238278504 @default.
- W2021034169 hasRelatedWork W4244109060 @default.
- W2021034169 hasVolume "89" @default.
- W2021034169 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2021034169 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2021034169 magId "2021034169" @default.
- W2021034169 workType "article" @default.