FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W202109462> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W202109462 endingPage "1826" @default.
• W202109462 startingPage "1813" @default.
• W202109462 abstract "Much research and development has been concentrated on the scatter compensation required for quantitative 3D positron emission tomography (PET). Increasingly sophisticated scatter correction procedures are under investigation, particularly those based on accurate scatter models and iterative reconstruction-based scatter compensation approaches. The main difference among the correction methods is the way in which the scatter component in the selected energy window is estimated. Monte Carlo methods provide further insight and might in themselves offer a possible correction procedure. Five scatter correction methods were compared in this study where applicable: the dual-energy window (DEW) technique, the convolution-subtraction (CVS) method, two variants of the Monte Carlo-based scatter correction technique (MCBSCI and MCBSC2) and our newly developed statistical reconstruction-based scatter correction (SRBSC) method. These scatter correction techniques were evaluated using Monte Carlo simulation studies, experimental phantom measurements and clinical studies. Accurate Monte Carlo modelling is still the gold standard since it allows the separation of scattered and unscattered events and comparison of the estimated and true unscattered component. In this study, our modified version of Monte Carlo-based scatter correction (MCBSC2) provided a good contrast recovery on the simulated Utah phantom, while the DEW method was found to be clearly superior for the experimental phantom studies in terms of quantitative accuracy at the expense of a significant deterioration in the signal-to-noise ratio. On the other hand, the immunity to noise in emission data of statistical reconstruction-based scatter correction methods makes them particularly applicable to low-count emission studies. All scatter correction methods gave very good activity recovery values for the simulated 3D Hoffman brain phantom, which averaged within 3%. The CVS and MCBSC 1 techniques tended to overcorrect while SRBSC undercorrected for scatter in most regions of this phantom. It was concluded that all correction methods significantly improve the image quality and contrast compared to the case where no correction is applied. Generally, it was shown that the differences in the estimated scatter distributions did not have a significant impact on the final quantitative results. The DEW method showed the best compromise between ease of implementation and quantitative accuracy, but entailed a significant deterioration in the signal-to-noise ratio." @default.
• W202109462 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W202109462 creator A5007891293 @default.
• W202109462 date "2000-10-12" @default.
• W202109462 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W202109462 title "Comparative evaluation of scatter correction techniques in 3D positron emission tomography" @default.
• W202109462 cites W1034380138 @default.
• W202109462 cites W1414259104 @default.
• W202109462 cites W1515026043 @default.
• W202109462 cites W1594154392 @default.
• W202109462 cites W16733889 @default.
• W202109462 cites W1969725410 @default.
• W202109462 cites W1970949013 @default.
• W202109462 cites W1974479674 @default.
• W202109462 cites W1974816985 @default.
• W202109462 cites W1980551243 @default.
• W202109462 cites W1993474563 @default.
• W202109462 cites W1994156491 @default.
• W202109462 cites W1995540339 @default.
• W202109462 cites W2009033318 @default.
• W202109462 cites W2023209758 @default.
• W202109462 cites W2038253228 @default.
• W202109462 cites W2062042462 @default.
• W202109462 cites W2084340599 @default.
• W202109462 cites W2093605415 @default.
• W202109462 cites W2096058896 @default.
• W202109462 cites W2096588591 @default.
• W202109462 cites W2113392673 @default.
• W202109462 cites W2117368760 @default.
• W202109462 cites W2132621387 @default.
• W202109462 cites W2133560545 @default.
• W202109462 cites W2138040877 @default.
• W202109462 cites W2145574089 @default.
• W202109462 cites W2154569220 @default.
• W202109462 cites W2154744699 @default.
• W202109462 cites W2159081727 @default.
• W202109462 cites W2168193316 @default.
• W202109462 cites W2186186699 @default.
• W202109462 cites W2246302105 @default.
• W202109462 cites W2275739917 @default.
• W202109462 cites W2344722368 @default.
• W202109462 cites W2548320994 @default.
• W202109462 cites W571667285 @default.
• W202109462 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s002590000385" @default.
• W202109462 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11189945" @default.
• W202109462 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
• W202109462 type Work @default.
• W202109462 sameAs 202109462 @default.
• W202109462 citedByCount "68" @default.
• W202109462 countsByYear W2021094622012 @default.
• W202109462 countsByYear W2021094622013 @default.
• W202109462 countsByYear W2021094622016 @default.
• W202109462 countsByYear W2021094622017 @default.
• W202109462 countsByYear W2021094622018 @default.
• W202109462 countsByYear W2021094622020 @default.
• W202109462 countsByYear W2021094622021 @default.
• W202109462 countsByYear W2021094622022 @default.
• W202109462 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W202109462 hasAuthorship W202109462A5007891293 @default.
• W202109462 hasBestOaLocation W2021094622 @default.
• W202109462 hasConcept C104293457 @default.
• W202109462 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W202109462 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W202109462 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W202109462 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W202109462 hasConcept C128197687 @default.
• W202109462 hasConcept C19499675 @default.
• W202109462 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W202109462 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W202109462 hasConceptScore W202109462C104293457 @default.
• W202109462 hasConceptScore W202109462C105795698 @default.
• W202109462 hasConceptScore W202109462C119857082 @default.
• W202109462 hasConceptScore W202109462C120665830 @default.
• W202109462 hasConceptScore W202109462C121332964 @default.
• W202109462 hasConceptScore W202109462C128197687 @default.
• W202109462 hasConceptScore W202109462C19499675 @default.
• W202109462 hasConceptScore W202109462C33923547 @default.
• W202109462 hasConceptScore W202109462C41008148 @default.
• W202109462 hasIssue "12" @default.
• W202109462 hasLocation W2021094621 @default.
• W202109462 hasLocation W2021094622 @default.
• W202109462 hasLocation W2021094623 @default.
• W202109462 hasOpenAccess W202109462 @default.
• W202109462 hasPrimaryLocation W2021094621 @default.
• W202109462 hasRelatedWork W1563128609 @default.
• W202109462 hasRelatedWork W2019179466 @default.
• W202109462 hasRelatedWork W2044185868 @default.
• W202109462 hasRelatedWork W2076879535 @default.
• W202109462 hasRelatedWork W2327272776 @default.
• W202109462 hasRelatedWork W2374482075 @default.
• W202109462 hasRelatedWork W2383981848 @default.
• W202109462 hasRelatedWork W2390224981 @default.
• W202109462 hasRelatedWork W2465354535 @default.
• W202109462 hasRelatedWork W4313537251 @default.
• W202109462 hasVolume "27" @default.
• W202109462 isParatext "false" @default.
• W202109462 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W202109462 magId "202109462" @default.

• next