FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2021557788> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2021557788 endingPage "71" @default.
• W2021557788 startingPage "67" @default.
• W2021557788 abstract "Introduction: The purpose of this study was to compare craniofacial measurements from cephalometric radiographs with analogous measurements from standardized facial photographs. Methods: The sample consisted of 326 subjects (168 white, 158 black) enrolled in a genetic epidemiological family study of sleep behavior. Traditional lateral cephalograms and standardized facial photographs were taken of each subject. Three angular, 3 linear, total face height, and lower face height cephalometric measurements were compared with 4 angular and 4 linear measurements from standardized photographs. Descriptive statistics for all measurements in the entire sample and for the racial subgroups were computed. Pearson product moment correlation coefficients were computed between analogous measurements, and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated from repeated measurements on the photographs. Results: The reliability of the photographic technique was excellent, with all measurements having intraclass correlation coefficients above 0.90. However, the correlations between analogous photographic and cephalometric measurements were lower and varied between 0.356 and 0.643. The highest correlations were observed for lower facial height and mandibular length, 0.643 and 0.562, respectively. In the black group, the correlations between cephalometric and photographic measurements of mandibular length and lower facial height were 0.676 and 0.690, respectively. Both were higher than those for white subjects, 0.399 and 0.577, respectively. Conclusions: Both linear and angular measurements useful for characterizing facial morphology can be reliably measured from facial photographs. However, only moderate correlations with analogous cephalometric measures were found. Therefore, standardized photographs and cephalograms most likely measure different aspects of facial morphology and cannot be used interchangeably. Cephalometrics remains the method of choice for clinical patient care, whereas photographs might be better for large-scale epidemiological studies, especially if there is a need for a low-cost, noninvasive method that be used in diverse clinical and field settings. Introduction: The purpose of this study was to compare craniofacial measurements from cephalometric radiographs with analogous measurements from standardized facial photographs. Methods: The sample consisted of 326 subjects (168 white, 158 black) enrolled in a genetic epidemiological family study of sleep behavior. Traditional lateral cephalograms and standardized facial photographs were taken of each subject. Three angular, 3 linear, total face height, and lower face height cephalometric measurements were compared with 4 angular and 4 linear measurements from standardized photographs. Descriptive statistics for all measurements in the entire sample and for the racial subgroups were computed. Pearson product moment correlation coefficients were computed between analogous measurements, and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated from repeated measurements on the photographs. Results: The reliability of the photographic technique was excellent, with all measurements having intraclass correlation coefficients above 0.90. However, the correlations between analogous photographic and cephalometric measurements were lower and varied between 0.356 and 0.643. The highest correlations were observed for lower facial height and mandibular length, 0.643 and 0.562, respectively. In the black group, the correlations between cephalometric and photographic measurements of mandibular length and lower facial height were 0.676 and 0.690, respectively. Both were higher than those for white subjects, 0.399 and 0.577, respectively. Conclusions: Both linear and angular measurements useful for characterizing facial morphology can be reliably measured from facial photographs. However, only moderate correlations with analogous cephalometric measures were found. Therefore, standardized photographs and cephalograms most likely measure different aspects of facial morphology and cannot be used interchangeably. Cephalometrics remains the method of choice for clinical patient care, whereas photographs might be better for large-scale epidemiological studies, especially if there is a need for a low-cost, noninvasive method that be used in diverse clinical and field settings." @default.
• W2021557788 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2021557788 creator A5010792919 @default.
• W2021557788 creator A5027472502 @default.
• W2021557788 creator A5049109821 @default.
• W2021557788 creator A5075594316 @default.
• W2021557788 creator A5083170303 @default.
• W2021557788 date "2007-01-01" @default.
• W2021557788 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2021557788 title "Correlations between cephalometric and facial photographic measurements of craniofacial form" @default.
• W2021557788 cites W1995016231 @default.
• W2021557788 cites W2062009106 @default.
• W2021557788 cites W2102973012 @default.
• W2021557788 cites W2137773825 @default.
• W2021557788 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.02.033" @default.
• W2021557788 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17208108" @default.
• W2021557788 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2021557788 type Work @default.
• W2021557788 sameAs 2021557788 @default.
• W2021557788 citedByCount "51" @default.
• W2021557788 countsByYear W20215577882012 @default.
• W2021557788 countsByYear W20215577882013 @default.
• W2021557788 countsByYear W20215577882014 @default.
• W2021557788 countsByYear W20215577882015 @default.
• W2021557788 countsByYear W20215577882016 @default.
• W2021557788 countsByYear W20215577882017 @default.
• W2021557788 countsByYear W20215577882018 @default.
• W2021557788 countsByYear W20215577882019 @default.
• W2021557788 countsByYear W20215577882020 @default.
• W2021557788 countsByYear W20215577882021 @default.
• W2021557788 countsByYear W20215577882022 @default.
• W2021557788 countsByYear W20215577882023 @default.
• W2021557788 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2021557788 hasAuthorship W2021557788A5010792919 @default.
• W2021557788 hasAuthorship W2021557788A5027472502 @default.
• W2021557788 hasAuthorship W2021557788A5049109821 @default.
• W2021557788 hasAuthorship W2021557788A5075594316 @default.
• W2021557788 hasAuthorship W2021557788A5083170303 @default.
• W2021557788 hasConcept C104709138 @default.
• W2021557788 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2021557788 hasConcept C117220453 @default.
• W2021557788 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2021557788 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2021557788 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2021557788 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2021557788 hasConcept C2777081826 @default.
• W2021557788 hasConcept C2781245598 @default.
• W2021557788 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2021557788 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2021557788 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W2021557788 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2021557788 hasConcept C9893847 @default.
• W2021557788 hasConceptScore W2021557788C104709138 @default.
• W2021557788 hasConceptScore W2021557788C105795698 @default.
• W2021557788 hasConceptScore W2021557788C117220453 @default.
• W2021557788 hasConceptScore W2021557788C118552586 @default.
• W2021557788 hasConceptScore W2021557788C141071460 @default.
• W2021557788 hasConceptScore W2021557788C199343813 @default.
• W2021557788 hasConceptScore W2021557788C2524010 @default.
• W2021557788 hasConceptScore W2021557788C2777081826 @default.
• W2021557788 hasConceptScore W2021557788C2781245598 @default.
• W2021557788 hasConceptScore W2021557788C29694066 @default.
• W2021557788 hasConceptScore W2021557788C33923547 @default.
• W2021557788 hasConceptScore W2021557788C36454342 @default.
• W2021557788 hasConceptScore W2021557788C71924100 @default.
• W2021557788 hasConceptScore W2021557788C9893847 @default.
• W2021557788 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2021557788 hasLocation W20215577881 @default.
• W2021557788 hasLocation W20215577882 @default.
• W2021557788 hasOpenAccess W2021557788 @default.
• W2021557788 hasPrimaryLocation W20215577881 @default.
• W2021557788 hasRelatedWork W1988316404 @default.
• W2021557788 hasRelatedWork W2018385598 @default.
• W2021557788 hasRelatedWork W2021557788 @default.
• W2021557788 hasRelatedWork W2023521928 @default.
• W2021557788 hasRelatedWork W2027196397 @default.
• W2021557788 hasRelatedWork W2027989011 @default.
• W2021557788 hasRelatedWork W2071466172 @default.
• W2021557788 hasRelatedWork W2140546143 @default.
• W2021557788 hasRelatedWork W2607200939 @default.
• W2021557788 hasRelatedWork W3196845736 @default.
• W2021557788 hasVolume "131" @default.
• W2021557788 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2021557788 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2021557788 magId "2021557788" @default.
• W2021557788 workType "article" @default.