Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2021651607> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 92 of
92
with 100 items per page.
- W2021651607 endingPage "33616" @default.
- W2021651607 startingPage "33613" @default.
- W2021651607 abstract "DNMT2 is a subgroup of the eukaryotic cytosine-5 DNA methyltransferase gene family. Unlike the other family members, proteins encoded by DNMT2 genes were not known before to possess DNA methyltransferase activities. Most recently, we have shown that the genome of Drosophila S2 cells stably expressing an exogenous Drosophila dDNMT2 cDNA became anomalously methylated at the 5′-positions of cytosines (Reddy, M. N., Tang, L. Y., Lee, T. L., and Shen, C.-K. J. (2003) Oncogene, in press). We present evidence here that the genomes of transgenic flies overexpressing the dDnmt2 protein also became hypermethylated at specific regions. Furthermore, transient transfection studies in combination with sodium bisulfite sequencing demonstrated that dDnmt2 as well as its mouse ortholog, mDnmt2, are capable of methylating a cotransfected plasmid DNA. These data provide solid evidence that the fly and mouse DNMT2 gene products are genuine cytosine-5 DNA methyltransferases. DNMT2 is a subgroup of the eukaryotic cytosine-5 DNA methyltransferase gene family. Unlike the other family members, proteins encoded by DNMT2 genes were not known before to possess DNA methyltransferase activities. Most recently, we have shown that the genome of Drosophila S2 cells stably expressing an exogenous Drosophila dDNMT2 cDNA became anomalously methylated at the 5′-positions of cytosines (Reddy, M. N., Tang, L. Y., Lee, T. L., and Shen, C.-K. J. (2003) Oncogene, in press). We present evidence here that the genomes of transgenic flies overexpressing the dDnmt2 protein also became hypermethylated at specific regions. Furthermore, transient transfection studies in combination with sodium bisulfite sequencing demonstrated that dDnmt2 as well as its mouse ortholog, mDnmt2, are capable of methylating a cotransfected plasmid DNA. These data provide solid evidence that the fly and mouse DNMT2 gene products are genuine cytosine-5 DNA methyltransferases. Methylation of the vertebrate genomes at cytosines is known to be accomplished by the combined actions of proteins encoded by different cytosine-5 DNA methyltransferases or DNA MTases. These proteins include the de novo DNA MTases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b, the maintenance DNA MTase Dnmt1, and their isomers (1Bestor T.H. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2000; 9: 2395-2402Crossref PubMed Scopus (1571) Google Scholar, 2Robertson K.D. Oncogene. 2002; 21: 5361-5379Crossref PubMed Scopus (390) Google Scholar, 3Okano M. Xie S. Li E. Nat. Genet. 1998; 19: 219-220Crossref PubMed Scopus (1260) Google Scholar, 4Lin M.J. Lee T.L. Hsu D.W. Shen C.-K.J. FEBS Lett. 2000; 469: 101-104Crossref PubMed Scopus (15) Google Scholar). There are also other DNA MTase-like proteins expressed in the eukaryotic cells, but they are without well documented DNA methylation activities. These include the Dnmt3L (5Delpus R. Brenner C. Burgers W.A. Putmans P. Kouzarides T. de Launoit Y. Fuks F. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002; 30: 2831-2838Google Scholar) and Dnmt2 proteins.The Dnmt2 proteins are relatively shorter than Dnmt3a, Dnmt3b, or Dnmt1, and structurally they are similar to the bacteria dcm enzyme (6Posfai J. Bhagwat A.S. Posfai G. Roberts R.J. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989; 17: 2421-2435Crossref PubMed Scopus (435) Google Scholar). The eukaryotic Dnmt2 protein family consists of the yeast pmt1 (7Wilkinson C.R. Bartlett R. Nurse P. Bird A.P. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995; 23: 203-210Crossref PubMed Scopus (91) Google Scholar), the mammalian Dnmt2 including mouse mDnmt2 and human hDnmt2 (8Okano M. Xie S. Li E. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998; 26: 2536-2540Crossref PubMed Scopus (336) Google Scholar, 9Yoder J.A. Bestor T.H. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1998; 7: 279-284Crossref PubMed Scopus (224) Google Scholar), and Drosophila dDnmt2 (10Hung M.S. Karthikeyan N. Huang B. Koo H.C. Kiger J. Shen C.-K.J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999; 96: 11940-11945Crossref PubMed Scopus (82) Google Scholar, 11Tweedie S. Ng H.H. Barlow A.L. Turner B.M. Hendrich B. Bird A. Nat. Genet. 1999; 23: 389-390Crossref PubMed Scopus (105) Google Scholar). Of the Dnmt2 proteins known, pmt1 has been demonstrated to be enzymatically inactive due to amino acid change at a potential catalytic site (12Pinarbas E. Elliott J. Hornby D.P. J. Mol. Biol. 1996; 257: 804-813Crossref PubMed Scopus (53) Google Scholar). Sequence analysis showed that mDnmt2, hDnmt2, and dDnmt2 all contain the conserved DNA MTase motifs (8Okano M. Xie S. Li E. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998; 26: 2536-2540Crossref PubMed Scopus (336) Google Scholar, 9Yoder J.A. Bestor T.H. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1998; 7: 279-284Crossref PubMed Scopus (224) Google Scholar, 10Hung M.S. Karthikeyan N. Huang B. Koo H.C. Kiger J. Shen C.-K.J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999; 96: 11940-11945Crossref PubMed Scopus (82) Google Scholar, 11Tweedie S. Ng H.H. Barlow A.L. Turner B.M. Hendrich B. Bird A. Nat. Genet. 1999; 23: 389-390Crossref PubMed Scopus (105) Google Scholar). DNA methylation analysis of ES cells with homozygous knock-out of the mouse mDNMT2 genes suggested that mDnmt2 protein might also be an inactive DNA MTase (8Okano M. Xie S. Li E. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998; 26: 2536-2540Crossref PubMed Scopus (336) Google Scholar). Finally, there has been no report on the DNA methylation activity of the Drosophila dDnmt2 until very recently. By overexpression of dDnmt2 in Drosophila S2 cells and subsequent analysis of the S2 cell genome with the sodium bisulfite sequencing approach, it was shown that specific regions were anomalously methylated in comparison to S2 cells without overexpression of the dDnmt2 protein (13Reddy, M. N., Tang, L. Y., Lee, T. L., and Shen, C.-K. J. (2003) Oncogene, in pressGoogle Scholar).To avoid potential side effects resulting from use of the long term-selected S2 cell culture in the above study, we have now examined the genome of transgenic Drosophila flies stably overexpressing dDnmt2. Interestingly, specific genomic regions of the transgenic flies were also found to be anomalously hypermethylated. To complement the fly analysis, we further carried out DNA transfection experiments to transiently express fly dDnmt2 or mouse mDnmt2 in S2 cells. As shown below, dDnmt2 as well as mDnmt2 are capable of methylating cytosines of a cotransfected plasmid. The conservation of the enzymatically active Dnmt2 proteins from mammals to the flies suggests that this DNA MTase subfamily likely carries out important and to-be-identified function(s).EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURESPlasmid Constructs—For transgenic fly work, the dDNMT2 cDNA was released from pGEM(1)-dDNMT2 with PacI-NcoI and blunt ended. This dDNMT2 fragment, which contains bp 6964–7024 linked to 7074–8051 of the dDNMT2 gene, was cloned at the EcoRI site of the polylinker of pUAST (14Brand A. Perrimon N. Development (Camb.). 1993; 118: 401-415Crossref PubMed Google Scholar), and the resulting plasmid, pUAST-dDNMT2, was used for germ line transformation. For transient transfection, pAC5.1/V5-HisA vector (Invitrogen) containing Drosophila actin promoter was digested with KpnI, blunt ended, and redigested with EcoRI. pSG424 plasmid (15Sedowski I. Ptashne M. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989; 17: 7539Crossref PubMed Scopus (470) Google Scholar) was cut with BglII, blunt ended, and the GAL4 DNA binding domain-containing fragment was released by EcoRI digestion. This fragment was ligated to the KpnI-EcoRI-digested pAC5.1/V5-HisA, resulting in pAC-GAL. For construction of pAC-GAL-dDNMT2 fusion plasmid, pGEM(2)-dDNMT2 was digested with ApaI, blunt ended, and the dDNMT2 fragment was released by EcoRI digestion. The fragment was ligated to pAC-GAL digested with EcoRI-SmaI. For construction of pAC-GAL-mDNMT2, full-length mDNMT2 cDNA was amplified from total RNA of mouse MEL cells by reverse transcriptase-PCR and cloned into pcDNA-3.1 HisC vector (Invitrogen), resulting in pcDNA-mDNMT2. The mDNMT2 fragment was released from pcDNA-mDNMT2 by EcoRI-NotI digestion and ligated to EcoRI-NotI-digested pAC-GAL. The target plasmid, pGEM-CG8547-p, contains the Drosophila CG8547 promoter region cloned into pGEM-T vector (Promega) following the manufacturer's guidelines. The details of construction of pGEM(1)-dDNMT2 and pGEM(2)-dDNMT2 are available upon request.Antibodies—Anti-dDnmt2 antibody was prepared as described in Reddy et al. (13Reddy, M. N., Tang, L. Y., Lee, T. L., and Shen, C.-K. J. (2003) Oncogene, in pressGoogle Scholar). dDnmt2-specific antibody was purified by passing the serum through dDnmt2-coupled CNBr-Sepharose column (Amersham Biosciences). The anti-gal mouse IgG monoclonal antibody, anti-mouse IgG, and anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibodies were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.Fly Stocks and Transgenic Flies Overexpressing dDnmt2—Oregon R (OR) 1The abbreviation used is: OR, Oregon R. was used as the wild-type standard. The maintenance and manipulation of the Drosophila stocks were performed at 25 °C with standard cornmeal-yeast-agar food. For overexpression experiments, pUAST-dDNMT2 transgenic lines were established and crossed with daughterless-Gal4 (da-GAL4) driver that provides ubiquitous overexpression of the dDnmt2 protein.S2 Cell Culture and Cotransfection—Drosophila S2 cells were maintained in monolayers at 24 °C in Schneider's medium (Sigma), pH 6.9, supplemented with CaCl2 (0.6 mg/ml), NaHCO3 (0.4 mg/ml), 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen), and antibiotics (25 units/ml penicillin and 25 μg/ml streptomycin, Invitrogen). Transient transfection of S2 cells was performed by the CaPO4 precipitation method. S2 cells at a density of 1 × 106 cells/ml in 5 ml were seeded into T 25-cm2 flasks (Nunclon) and allowed to adhere to the surface for 12 h. 3 h before transfection, the medium was replenished. The calcium phosphate-DNA precipitate was prepared by mixing 5 μg of the expression plasmids (pAC-GAL, pAC-GAL-mDNMT2, or pAC-GAL-dDNMT2) and 5 μg of the target plasmid (pGEM-CG8547-p) in 225 μl of 0.1× TE (1 mm Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, and 0.1 mm EDTA), 25 μl of 2.5 m CaCl2, and 250 μl of 2× HEPES-buffered saline, pH 7.1. The precipitate was added drop-wise to the cultures. After 12 h of incubation, the medium was replaced, and incubation continued for another 48 h.Protein Isolation and Western Blot—The Drosophila protein extracts were prepared by homogenizing embryos or adult flies in 0.4 ml of 50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 100 mm NaCl, 5 mm EDTA, 0.1 mm dithiothreitol, 0.5% Triton X-100, 0.2% protease inhibitor mixture (Sigma), and 1 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. The lysates from S2 cells transiently transfected with pAC-GAL, pAC-GAL-dDNMT2, or pAC-GAL-mDNMT2 were prepared by lysis in the same buffer as above but with three freeze-thaw cycles. The lysates were centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 30 min. The protein concentrations in the supernatants were determined using Bio-Rad protein assay kit. 50 μg per lane of the extracts were loaded on SDS-PAGE gel and transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane by semidry transfer method. The membranes were probed with anti-dDnmt2 antibody or with anti-gal mouse monoclonal antibody. The hybridizing bands were developed with the enhanced chemiluminescence Western blotting detection system (PerkinElmer Life Sciences).DNA Isolation for Sodium Bisulfite Genomic Sequencing—Drosophila embryos or adult flies were homogenized in 20 mm Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 100 mm NaCl, 10 mm EDTA, 8.5% SDS, and 10 μg/ml proteinase K, and incubated at 50 °C overnight. The DNA was extracted with phenol: chloroform:isoamyl alcohol and then precipitated with isopropanol. After resuspension in H2O containing 1 μg/μl RNase A, the samples were incubated at 50 °C for 30 min and then stored overnight at 4 °C before use.To prepare nuclear DNA from transfected S2 cells, the cells were incubated in 10 mm Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 140 mm NaCl, 1.5 mm MgCl2, and 0.5% Nonidet P-40 (v/v) on ice for 10 min. The lysed cells were centrifuged at 1600 × g for 5 min. The pelleted nuclei were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline and lysed in 0.5 ml of TRIzol (Invitrogen). The lysates were mixed with 0.2 ml of chloroform and incubated at room temperature for 10 min. The aqueous phase was separated by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 10 min. The DNA was then precipitated with ethanol, dissolved in 1× TE, pH 8.0, and used for bisulfite sequencing.Bisulfite Genomic Sequencing—The sodium bisulfite genomic sequencing followed the procedures used by Warnecke et al. (16Warnecke P.M. Stirzaker C. Song J. Grunau C. Melki J.R. Clarke S.J. Methods. 2002; 27: 101-107Crossref PubMed Scopus (244) Google Scholar) with modifications as described in Reddy et al. (13Reddy, M. N., Tang, L. Y., Lee, T. L., and Shen, C.-K. J. (2003) Oncogene, in pressGoogle Scholar). The PCR products from the second round of amplification were gel-purified, subcloned into pGEM-T (Promega), and subjected to automated sequencing in ABI 3730 DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems).RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONAnomalous Genome Hypermethylation of dDnmt2-overexpressing Flies—dDNMT2 gene is located on Drosophila chromosome 2L and cytogenetically mapped to 33C4. After splicing, its mRNA encodes a protein 345 amino acids long (Fig. 1A). To examine whether overexpression of the dDnmt2 protein leads to deregulated methylation or hypermethylation of the fly genome, pUAST-dDNMT2 transgenic fly lines were established and crossed with da-GAL4 as described under “Experimental Procedures.” The overexpression of dDnmt2 protein was determined by immunoblotting with anti-dDnmt2. Under the conditions used, little dDnmt2 could be detected in the extracts from embryos and adults of the wild-type flies (lanes 1 and 3, Fig. 1B). On the other hand, the embryos and adult flies of the dDnmt2 transgenic line OR(dDNMT2) contain apparently overexpressed dDnmt2 protein (lanes 2 and 4, Fig. 1B).We isolated genomic DNAs from embryos and adult flies of both the wild-type and OR(dDNMT2). The DNA samples were then subjected to bisulfite genomic sequencing. Typical fluorograms of the sequencing results are exemplified in Fig. 1C, and the data of the methylation status of two of the genomic regions analyzed, CG8547 and CG8553, are summarized in Table I.Table IData summary of sequences of clones derived from sodium bisulfite-treated and PCR-amplified genomic DNA samples of DrosophilaDevelopmental stagesCG8547CG8553Clones sequencedMethylation statusClones sequencedMethylation statusOR2-h embryos1611 (-)2118 (-)5 (one m5C)1 (one m5C)2 (two m5C)6-h embryos2020 (-)1313 (-)Adults1311 (-)1010 (-)2 (one m5C)OR (dDNMT2)2-h embryos1210 (-)2011 (-)1 (one m5C)2 (one m5C)1 (two m5C)7 (many m5C)6-h embryos2414 (-)1614 (-)10 (many m5C)2 (one m5C)Adults1413 (-)87 (-)1 (one m5C)1 (one m5C) Open table in a new tab It has been shown previously that 0.1–0.6% of the cytosines of the fly genome are methylated, with the methylation level highest in the early embryonic stage (17Gowher H. Leismann O. Jeltsch A. EMBO J. 2000; 19: 6918-6923Crossref PubMed Scopus (166) Google Scholar, 18Lyko F. Ramsahoye B.H. Jaenisch R. Nature. 2000; 408: 538-540Crossref PubMed Scopus (357) Google Scholar). As shown in Table I, overexpression of dDnmt2 in the flies resulted in deregulated hypermethylation of both CG8547 and CG8553. In particular, the sequencing data of 20 clones derived from CG8547 of the 6 h embryos of the wild type indicate that the region is void of m5C. However, the sequences of 10 out of the 24 clones derived from the same region of the 6 h embryos of OR(dDNMT2) showed hypermethylation in the genome of this dDnmt2-overexpressing line (Table I). Similarly, CG8553 of the 2-h embryos of OR(dDNMT2) is hypermethylated in comparison with the wild type embryos. Both the embryos and adults of OR(dDNMT2) appear to have more m5C within this region than the wild type (Table I). In particular, 7 out of 20 clones from the 2-h embryos of OR(dDNMT2) have identical hypermethylated pattern as shown partly in Fig. 1C.Both dDnmt2 and mDnmt2 Generated m5C on Cotransfected Plasmid DNA in Drosophila Cells—The Drosophila S2 cell line has been used recently in a stable transfection assay to demonstrate methylation of the fly genome by dDnmt2 (13Reddy, M. N., Tang, L. Y., Lee, T. L., and Shen, C.-K. J. (2003) Oncogene, in pressGoogle Scholar). To double check potential side effects that might be caused by long term cell culturing in the above assay, we carried out transient transfection studies with S2 cells. A series of plasmids, including pAC-GAL, pAC-GAL-dDNMT2, and pAC-GAL-mDNMT2, were constructed previously for the test of potential repressor activities of dDnmt2 and mDnmt2. We have used these plasmids to see whether transient expression of gal-dDmnt2 or gal-mDnmt2 fusion would methylate a cotransfected plasmid.As described under “Experimental Procedures,” the three expression plasmids were individually cotransfected with the target plasmid pGEM-CG8547-p. The expression of either gal-dDnmt2 or gal-mDnmt2 could be easily detected by Western blot (Fig. 2A). At 60 h post-transfection, the nuclei of the transfected cells were purified. The nuclear DNA samples containing mainly the plasmids transported into the nuclei were isolated and subjected to sodium bisulfite sequencing using appropriate primers specific for the insert of pGEM-CG8547-p (Fig. 2B). As exemplified in Fig. 2C, none of the 15 DNA clones from the nuclei expressing gal contained m5C-derived C bases (panel I, Fig. 2C). In contrast, the DNA sequences of 6 out of 21 and 6 out of 24 clones derived from the nuclei expressing gal-dDNMT2 and gal-mDNMT2, respectively, indicated that the DNA insert of the target plasmid was methylated by these two proteins in transiently transfected S2 cells. As exemplified in panels II–IV and V–VII, respectively, of Fig. 2C, dDnmt2 and mDnmt2 caused similar and overlapping of C-methylation of the target plasmid. The data demonstrated that both dDnmt2 and mDnmt2 possess C-5 methyltransferase activities.Fig. 2DNA methylation by transiently expressed dDnmt2 and mDnmt2. Cotransfections of the target plasmid pGEM-CG8547-p with pAC-GAL, pAC-GAL-dDNMT2, or pAC-GAL-mDNMT2 were carried out. Nuclear DNAs were isolated from the transfected cells as described under “Experimental Procedures.” Sodium bisulfite sequencing assay was then performed using primers specific for the insert of pGEM-CG8547-p. A, Western blot of extracts from cells cotransfected with the target plasmid plus pAC-GAL (lane 1), pAC-GAL-mDNMT2 (lane 2), or pAC-GAL-dDNMT2 (lane 3). The probe used for the blot was anti-gal (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.). B, nucleotide sequence of the insert of the target plasmid. The segments according to which the primers were designed for PCR amplification of the bisulfite treated DNAs are underlined by the three arrows. Also underlined are C residues methylated during transient transfection by mDnmt2, as exemplified by the sequence of one of the DNA clones derived from nuclear plasmid DNAs of the transfected cells. C, parts of the chromatograms from DNA sequencing of the clones.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)The Dnmt2 Proteins of Mammals and Flies Are Cytosine-5 DNA MTases—In this study, we have provided further evidence supporting that Drosophila dDnmt2 protein is indeed a DNA MTase. It not only generated deregulated hypermethylation of the genome of stably transfected Drosophila cell line (13Reddy, M. N., Tang, L. Y., Lee, T. L., and Shen, C.-K. J. (2003) Oncogene, in pressGoogle Scholar), but it is also active, albeit as a gal fusion polypeptide, in the current transient transfection assay. In addition, it caused deregulated hypermethylation of specific regions of the genomes of transgenic flies overexpressing the protein. Most interestingly, the mouse ortholog of the fly enzyme, mDnmt2, also methylates DNA in the transient transfection assay. It should be noted here that CG dinucleotide is not the primary target of methylation by the Dnmt2 proteins, as in the case of the other eukaryotic DNA MTases.Our data are consistent with several previous studies implicating that, except for yeast pmt1 (7Wilkinson C.R. Bartlett R. Nurse P. Bird A.P. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995; 23: 203-210Crossref PubMed Scopus (91) Google Scholar, 12Pinarbas E. Elliott J. Hornby D.P. J. Mol. Biol. 1996; 257: 804-813Crossref PubMed Scopus (53) Google Scholar), the Dnmt2 protein family members might be active DNA MTases. First, the functional motifs conserved among the well known DNA MTases such as Dnmt1 are also conserved in dDnmt2 and mammalian Dnmt2 (8Okano M. Xie S. Li E. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998; 26: 2536-2540Crossref PubMed Scopus (336) Google Scholar, 9Yoder J.A. Bestor T.H. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1998; 7: 279-284Crossref PubMed Scopus (224) Google Scholar, 10Hung M.S. Karthikeyan N. Huang B. Koo H.C. Kiger J. Shen C.-K.J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999; 96: 11940-11945Crossref PubMed Scopus (82) Google Scholar, 11Tweedie S. Ng H.H. Barlow A.L. Turner B.M. Hendrich B. Bird A. Nat. Genet. 1999; 23: 389-390Crossref PubMed Scopus (105) Google Scholar). Second, the human Dnmt2 protein binds tightly to DNA, and in crystals, its complex with DNA adopts a conformation similar to the protein-DNA complex of a bacterial C-methylating enzyme M.HhaI (19Dong A. Yoder J.A. Zhang X. Zhou L. Bestor T.H. Cheng X. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001; 29: 439-448Crossref PubMed Scopus (193) Google Scholar). Third, the mammalian Dnmt2 proteins, as well as other known active DNA MTases, are attached to 5′-azacytidine-incorporated DNA (20Liu K. Wang Y.F. Cantemir C. Muller M.T. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003; 23: 2709-2719Crossref PubMed Scopus (126) Google Scholar).While proposing that the eukaryotic DNMT2 gene family encodes active DNA MTases, we note here that mouse with homozygous knock-out of the mDNMT2 gene has no obvious phenotype. 2M. Okano and E. Li, personal communication. Similarly, we have not yet noticed obvious phenotype of the dDnmt2-overexpressing flies. 3V. Rasheva and M.-S. Hung, unpublished data. Thus, the DNMT2 gene is not essential for the growth and development of the flies and mice. Identification of the target genes regulated by the Dnmt2 proteins could be the first step toward understanding the biological functions of this new class of eukaryotic DNA MTases. Methylation of the vertebrate genomes at cytosines is known to be accomplished by the combined actions of proteins encoded by different cytosine-5 DNA methyltransferases or DNA MTases. These proteins include the de novo DNA MTases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b, the maintenance DNA MTase Dnmt1, and their isomers (1Bestor T.H. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2000; 9: 2395-2402Crossref PubMed Scopus (1571) Google Scholar, 2Robertson K.D. Oncogene. 2002; 21: 5361-5379Crossref PubMed Scopus (390) Google Scholar, 3Okano M. Xie S. Li E. Nat. Genet. 1998; 19: 219-220Crossref PubMed Scopus (1260) Google Scholar, 4Lin M.J. Lee T.L. Hsu D.W. Shen C.-K.J. FEBS Lett. 2000; 469: 101-104Crossref PubMed Scopus (15) Google Scholar). There are also other DNA MTase-like proteins expressed in the eukaryotic cells, but they are without well documented DNA methylation activities. These include the Dnmt3L (5Delpus R. Brenner C. Burgers W.A. Putmans P. Kouzarides T. de Launoit Y. Fuks F. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002; 30: 2831-2838Google Scholar) and Dnmt2 proteins. The Dnmt2 proteins are relatively shorter than Dnmt3a, Dnmt3b, or Dnmt1, and structurally they are similar to the bacteria dcm enzyme (6Posfai J. Bhagwat A.S. Posfai G. Roberts R.J. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989; 17: 2421-2435Crossref PubMed Scopus (435) Google Scholar). The eukaryotic Dnmt2 protein family consists of the yeast pmt1 (7Wilkinson C.R. Bartlett R. Nurse P. Bird A.P. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995; 23: 203-210Crossref PubMed Scopus (91) Google Scholar), the mammalian Dnmt2 including mouse mDnmt2 and human hDnmt2 (8Okano M. Xie S. Li E. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998; 26: 2536-2540Crossref PubMed Scopus (336) Google Scholar, 9Yoder J.A. Bestor T.H. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1998; 7: 279-284Crossref PubMed Scopus (224) Google Scholar), and Drosophila dDnmt2 (10Hung M.S. Karthikeyan N. Huang B. Koo H.C. Kiger J. Shen C.-K.J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999; 96: 11940-11945Crossref PubMed Scopus (82) Google Scholar, 11Tweedie S. Ng H.H. Barlow A.L. Turner B.M. Hendrich B. Bird A. Nat. Genet. 1999; 23: 389-390Crossref PubMed Scopus (105) Google Scholar). Of the Dnmt2 proteins known, pmt1 has been demonstrated to be enzymatically inactive due to amino acid change at a potential catalytic site (12Pinarbas E. Elliott J. Hornby D.P. J. Mol. Biol. 1996; 257: 804-813Crossref PubMed Scopus (53) Google Scholar). Sequence analysis showed that mDnmt2, hDnmt2, and dDnmt2 all contain the conserved DNA MTase motifs (8Okano M. Xie S. Li E. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998; 26: 2536-2540Crossref PubMed Scopus (336) Google Scholar, 9Yoder J.A. Bestor T.H. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1998; 7: 279-284Crossref PubMed Scopus (224) Google Scholar, 10Hung M.S. Karthikeyan N. Huang B. Koo H.C. Kiger J. Shen C.-K.J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999; 96: 11940-11945Crossref PubMed Scopus (82) Google Scholar, 11Tweedie S. Ng H.H. Barlow A.L. Turner B.M. Hendrich B. Bird A. Nat. Genet. 1999; 23: 389-390Crossref PubMed Scopus (105) Google Scholar). DNA methylation analysis of ES cells with homozygous knock-out of the mouse mDNMT2 genes suggested that mDnmt2 protein might also be an inactive DNA MTase (8Okano M. Xie S. Li E. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998; 26: 2536-2540Crossref PubMed Scopus (336) Google Scholar). Finally, there has been no report on the DNA methylation activity of the Drosophila dDnmt2 until very recently. By overexpression of dDnmt2 in Drosophila S2 cells and subsequent analysis of the S2 cell genome with the sodium bisulfite sequencing approach, it was shown that specific regions were anomalously methylated in comparison to S2 cells without overexpression of the dDnmt2 protein (13Reddy, M. N., Tang, L. Y., Lee, T. L., and Shen, C.-K. J. (2003) Oncogene, in pressGoogle Scholar). To avoid potential side effects resulting from use of the long term-selected S2 cell culture in the above study, we have now examined the genome of transgenic Drosophila flies stably overexpressing dDnmt2. Interestingly, specific genomic regions of the transgenic flies were also found to be anomalously hypermethylated. To complement the fly analysis, we further carried out DNA transfection experiments to transiently express fly dDnmt2 or mouse mDnmt2 in S2 cells. As shown below, dDnmt2 as well as mDnmt2 are capable of methylating cytosines of a cotransfected plasmid. The conservation of the enzymatically active Dnmt2 proteins from mammals to the flies suggests that this DNA MTase subfamily likely carries out important and to-be-identified function(s). EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURESPlasmid Constructs—For transgenic fly work, the dDNMT2 cDNA was released from pGEM(1)-dDNMT2 with PacI-NcoI and blunt ended. This dDNMT2 fragment, which contains bp 6964–7024 linked to 7074–8051 of the dDNMT2 gene, was cloned at the EcoRI site of the polylinker of pUAST (14Brand A. Perrimon N. Development (Camb.). 1993; 118: 401-415Crossref PubMed Google Scholar), and the resulting plasmid, pUAST-dDNMT2, was used for germ line transformation. For transient transfection, pAC5.1/V5-HisA vector (Invitrogen) containing Drosophila actin promoter was digested with KpnI, blunt ended, and redigested with EcoRI. pSG424 plasmid (15Sedowski I. Ptashne M. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989; 17: 7539Crossref PubMed Scopus (470) Google Scholar) was cut with BglII, blunt ended, and the GAL4 DNA binding domain-containing fragment was released by EcoRI digestion. This fragment was ligated to the KpnI-EcoRI-digested pAC5.1/V5-HisA, resulting in pAC-GAL. For construction of pAC-GAL-dDNMT2 fusion plasmid, pGEM(2)-dDNMT2 was digested with ApaI, blunt ended, and the dDNMT2 fragment was released by EcoRI digestion. The fragment was ligated to pAC-GAL digested with EcoRI-SmaI. For construction of pAC-GAL-mDNMT2, full-length mDNMT2 cDNA was amplified from total RNA of mouse MEL cells by reverse transcriptase-PCR and cloned into pcDNA-3.1 HisC vector (Invitrogen), resulting in pcDNA-mDNMT2. The mDNMT2 fragment was released from pcDNA-mDNMT2 by EcoRI-NotI digestion and ligated to EcoRI-NotI-digested pAC-GAL. The target plasmid, pGEM-CG8547-p, contains the Drosophila CG8547 promoter region cloned into pGEM-T vector (Promega) following the manufacturer's guidelines. The details of construction of pGEM(1)-dDNMT2 and pGEM(2)-dDNMT2 are available upon request.Antibodies—Anti-dDnmt2 antibody was prepared as described in Reddy et al. (13Reddy, M. N., Tang, L. Y., Lee, T. L., and Shen, C.-K. J. (2003) Oncogene, in pressGoogle Scholar). dDnmt2-specific antibody was purified by passing the serum through dDnmt2-coupled CNBr-Sepharose column (Amersham Biosciences). The anti-gal mouse IgG monoclonal antibody, anti-mouse IgG, and anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibodies were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.Fly Stocks and Transgenic Flies Overexpressing dDnmt2—Oregon R (OR) 1The abbreviation used is: OR, Oregon R. was used as the wild-type standard. The maintenance and manipulation of the Drosophila stocks were performed at 25 °C with standard cornmeal-yeast-agar food. For overexpression experiments, pUAST-dDNMT2 transgenic lines were established and crossed with daughterless-Gal4 (da-GAL4) driver that provides ubiquitous overexpression of the dDnmt2 protein.S2 Cell Culture and Cotransfection—Drosophila S2 cells were maintained in monolayers at 24 °C in Schneider's medium (Sigma), pH 6.9, supplemented with CaCl2 (0.6 mg/ml), NaHCO3 (0.4 mg/ml), 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen), and antibiotics (25 units/ml penicillin and 25 μg/ml streptomycin, Invitrogen). Transient transfection of S2 cells was performed by the CaPO4 precipitation method. S2 cells at a density of 1 × 106 cell" @default.
- W2021651607 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2021651607 creator A5016364609 @default.
- W2021651607 creator A5023681191 @default.
- W2021651607 creator A5036743801 @default.
- W2021651607 creator A5042873930 @default.
- W2021651607 creator A5071760644 @default.
- W2021651607 creator A5080145429 @default.
- W2021651607 creator A5086637993 @default.
- W2021651607 date "2003-09-01" @default.
- W2021651607 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W2021651607 title "The Eukaryotic DNMT2 Genes Encode a New Class of Cytosine-5 DNA Methyltransferases" @default.
- W2021651607 cites W1487964420 @default.
- W2021651607 cites W1577875429 @default.
- W2021651607 cites W1974418151 @default.
- W2021651607 cites W1980069119 @default.
- W2021651607 cites W1982273994 @default.
- W2021651607 cites W2002129512 @default.
- W2021651607 cites W2004477171 @default.
- W2021651607 cites W2015888582 @default.
- W2021651607 cites W2029683459 @default.
- W2021651607 cites W2041902801 @default.
- W2021651607 cites W2075496313 @default.
- W2021651607 cites W2076911571 @default.
- W2021651607 cites W2085704779 @default.
- W2021651607 cites W2107038650 @default.
- W2021651607 cites W2110643873 @default.
- W2021651607 cites W2128720603 @default.
- W2021651607 cites W2132554729 @default.
- W2021651607 cites W2158526038 @default.
- W2021651607 doi "https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.c300255200" @default.
- W2021651607 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12819212" @default.
- W2021651607 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
- W2021651607 type Work @default.
- W2021651607 sameAs 2021651607 @default.
- W2021651607 citedByCount "79" @default.
- W2021651607 countsByYear W20216516072012 @default.
- W2021651607 countsByYear W20216516072013 @default.
- W2021651607 countsByYear W20216516072014 @default.
- W2021651607 countsByYear W20216516072015 @default.
- W2021651607 countsByYear W20216516072016 @default.
- W2021651607 countsByYear W20216516072017 @default.
- W2021651607 countsByYear W20216516072018 @default.
- W2021651607 countsByYear W20216516072020 @default.
- W2021651607 countsByYear W20216516072021 @default.
- W2021651607 countsByYear W20216516072023 @default.
- W2021651607 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2021651607 hasAuthorship W2021651607A5016364609 @default.
- W2021651607 hasAuthorship W2021651607A5023681191 @default.
- W2021651607 hasAuthorship W2021651607A5036743801 @default.
- W2021651607 hasAuthorship W2021651607A5042873930 @default.
- W2021651607 hasAuthorship W2021651607A5071760644 @default.
- W2021651607 hasAuthorship W2021651607A5080145429 @default.
- W2021651607 hasAuthorship W2021651607A5086637993 @default.
- W2021651607 hasBestOaLocation W20216516071 @default.
- W2021651607 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
- W2021651607 hasConcept C2776023528 @default.
- W2021651607 hasConcept C33288867 @default.
- W2021651607 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
- W2021651607 hasConcept C552990157 @default.
- W2021651607 hasConcept C66746571 @default.
- W2021651607 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2021651607 hasConcept C91965660 @default.
- W2021651607 hasConceptScore W2021651607C104317684 @default.
- W2021651607 hasConceptScore W2021651607C2776023528 @default.
- W2021651607 hasConceptScore W2021651607C33288867 @default.
- W2021651607 hasConceptScore W2021651607C54355233 @default.
- W2021651607 hasConceptScore W2021651607C552990157 @default.
- W2021651607 hasConceptScore W2021651607C66746571 @default.
- W2021651607 hasConceptScore W2021651607C86803240 @default.
- W2021651607 hasConceptScore W2021651607C91965660 @default.
- W2021651607 hasIssue "36" @default.
- W2021651607 hasLocation W20216516071 @default.
- W2021651607 hasOpenAccess W2021651607 @default.
- W2021651607 hasPrimaryLocation W20216516071 @default.
- W2021651607 hasRelatedWork W110945905 @default.
- W2021651607 hasRelatedWork W1628320827 @default.
- W2021651607 hasRelatedWork W1996747958 @default.
- W2021651607 hasRelatedWork W2019492821 @default.
- W2021651607 hasRelatedWork W2055728251 @default.
- W2021651607 hasRelatedWork W2081535035 @default.
- W2021651607 hasRelatedWork W2089359176 @default.
- W2021651607 hasRelatedWork W2112571173 @default.
- W2021651607 hasRelatedWork W2400132286 @default.
- W2021651607 hasRelatedWork W2537181816 @default.
- W2021651607 hasVolume "278" @default.
- W2021651607 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2021651607 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2021651607 magId "2021651607" @default.
- W2021651607 workType "article" @default.