FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2021667573> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2021667573 endingPage "250" @default.
• W2021667573 startingPage "243" @default.
• W2021667573 abstract "An emerging body of literature has established a relationship between case volume and outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP). Such findings come in the context of an already well-established association between both surgeon and hospital case volume in the field of cardiovascular surgery and for several high-risk cancer operations. The purpose of this review is to identify and summarize the seminal studies to date that investigate the impact of RP volume on patient outcomes. We performed a literature search of the English language studies available through PubMed that pertain to this topic. Thirteen original studies and a meta-analysis were found, which focus on the impact of hospital RP volume on surgical outcomes (including length of stay, perioperative complication rate, perioperative mortality, readmission rate, and several long term measures of treatment effect). Eight studies were identified that interrogated the relationship between individual surgeon case volume and outcomes. Across multiple outcome metrics, there is a pervasive association between higher hospital RP case volume and improved outcomes. Increasing individual surgeon volume may also portend better outcomes, not only perioperatively, but even with respect to long-term cancer control and urinary function. While most data arise from retrospective cohort studies, these studies, for the most part, are of sound design, show an impressive magnitude of effect, and demonstrate an impact on outcome that is proportional to surgical volume. Further research should focus on finding a means by which to translate these observations into improvements in the quality of prostate cancer care. To address differences in outcome between low volume and high volume surgeons, some have proposed and implemented subspecialization within practice groups, while others have looked toward subspecialty certification for urologic oncologists. With regard to differences in hospital volume, regionalization of care has been proposed as a solution, but is fraught with pitfalls. It may be more pragmatic and, ultimately more beneficial to patients, however, to identify processes of care that are already in place at high volume hospitals and implement them at lower volume centers. Similarly, we advocate careful studies to identify successful surgical techniques of high volume surgeons and efforts to disseminate these techniques." @default.
• W2021667573 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2021667573 creator A5050663947 @default.
• W2021667573 creator A5066279767 @default.
• W2021667573 creator A5076102914 @default.
• W2021667573 creator A5091459519 @default.
• W2021667573 date "2010-05-01" @default.
• W2021667573 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2021667573 title "Impact of surgeon and hospital volume on outcomes of radical prostatectomy" @default.
• W2021667573 cites W1966868305 @default.
• W2021667573 cites W1968339106 @default.
• W2021667573 cites W1977329065 @default.
• W2021667573 cites W1995942451 @default.
• W2021667573 cites W1997709970 @default.
• W2021667573 cites W1999450691 @default.
• W2021667573 cites W2000318279 @default.
• W2021667573 cites W2019425393 @default.
• W2021667573 cites W2033806759 @default.
• W2021667573 cites W2035148760 @default.
• W2021667573 cites W2043103956 @default.
• W2021667573 cites W2046133119 @default.
• W2021667573 cites W2066092646 @default.
• W2021667573 cites W2074572183 @default.
• W2021667573 cites W2079065919 @default.
• W2021667573 cites W2083892639 @default.
• W2021667573 cites W2087451337 @default.
• W2021667573 cites W2092092140 @default.
• W2021667573 cites W2107245980 @default.
• W2021667573 cites W2110446674 @default.
• W2021667573 cites W2115167752 @default.
• W2021667573 cites W2118965271 @default.
• W2021667573 cites W2135187257 @default.
• W2021667573 cites W2135375142 @default.
• W2021667573 cites W2139516290 @default.
• W2021667573 cites W2165974629 @default.
• W2021667573 cites W2167825252 @default.
• W2021667573 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.03.001" @default.
• W2021667573 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19395287" @default.
• W2021667573 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2021667573 type Work @default.
• W2021667573 sameAs 2021667573 @default.
• W2021667573 citedByCount "102" @default.
• W2021667573 countsByYear W20216675732012 @default.
• W2021667573 countsByYear W20216675732013 @default.
• W2021667573 countsByYear W20216675732014 @default.
• W2021667573 countsByYear W20216675732015 @default.
• W2021667573 countsByYear W20216675732016 @default.
• W2021667573 countsByYear W20216675732017 @default.
• W2021667573 countsByYear W20216675732018 @default.
• W2021667573 countsByYear W20216675732019 @default.
• W2021667573 countsByYear W20216675732020 @default.
• W2021667573 countsByYear W20216675732021 @default.
• W2021667573 countsByYear W20216675732022 @default.
• W2021667573 countsByYear W20216675732023 @default.
• W2021667573 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2021667573 hasAuthorship W2021667573A5050663947 @default.
• W2021667573 hasAuthorship W2021667573A5066279767 @default.
• W2021667573 hasAuthorship W2021667573A5076102914 @default.
• W2021667573 hasAuthorship W2021667573A5091459519 @default.
• W2021667573 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2021667573 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2021667573 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2021667573 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2021667573 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2021667573 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2021667573 hasConcept C2779466945 @default.
• W2021667573 hasConcept C2780192828 @default.
• W2021667573 hasConcept C31174226 @default.
• W2021667573 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2021667573 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2021667573 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2021667573 hasConceptScore W2021667573C121608353 @default.
• W2021667573 hasConceptScore W2021667573C126322002 @default.
• W2021667573 hasConceptScore W2021667573C141071460 @default.
• W2021667573 hasConceptScore W2021667573C151730666 @default.
• W2021667573 hasConceptScore W2021667573C167135981 @default.
• W2021667573 hasConceptScore W2021667573C2779343474 @default.
• W2021667573 hasConceptScore W2021667573C2779466945 @default.
• W2021667573 hasConceptScore W2021667573C2780192828 @default.
• W2021667573 hasConceptScore W2021667573C31174226 @default.
• W2021667573 hasConceptScore W2021667573C61434518 @default.
• W2021667573 hasConceptScore W2021667573C71924100 @default.
• W2021667573 hasConceptScore W2021667573C86803240 @default.
• W2021667573 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2021667573 hasLocation W20216675731 @default.
• W2021667573 hasLocation W20216675732 @default.
• W2021667573 hasOpenAccess W2021667573 @default.
• W2021667573 hasPrimaryLocation W20216675731 @default.
• W2021667573 hasRelatedWork W1985168450 @default.
• W2021667573 hasRelatedWork W2003657438 @default.
• W2021667573 hasRelatedWork W2006505155 @default.
• W2021667573 hasRelatedWork W2079486447 @default.
• W2021667573 hasRelatedWork W2559760892 @default.
• W2021667573 hasRelatedWork W2560382937 @default.
• W2021667573 hasRelatedWork W2738748327 @default.
• W2021667573 hasRelatedWork W2981608789 @default.
• W2021667573 hasRelatedWork W3187635025 @default.
• W2021667573 hasRelatedWork W3208090289 @default.

• next