Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2021671205> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 66 of
66
with 100 items per page.
- W2021671205 abstract "In order to compare and contrast the sampling response to cotton dust of two forms of dust sampling 85 work areas were identified over a 2-year period for investigation in eight Lancashire spinning mills. Three hundred and five work area dust samples were undertaken and 252 personal dust samples were performed. Operatives who spent a minimum of 80% of their working shift in the area in which work area sampling was also performed were selected for personal sampling. Work area dust exposures have recently shown an upward trend, with highest concentrations occurring in the ring spinning room (median 1.15 mg m-3, range 0.82-2.06). Personal dust samples showed a reduction in dust exposures as cotton processing progressed, from a high in the opening room (median value of 6.24 mg m-3, range 1.0-41.5) to a minimum of 1.02 mg m-3 (range 0.30-0.93) in the winding room. The ratio of measured personal sampling dust exposure to work area sampling exposure was used to compare the relative performance of the two techniques. This ratio was highest in the early processes. There was a 7.8-fold difference in measurement between the two techniques in the opening processes, falling to 4.9 in carding and 4.2 in the other card-room processes. However in ring spinning the ratio was only 1.4, suggesting a degree of comparability in the methods at this stage of processing. The value rose to 2.5 for the last stage (winding). Respiratory disease is known to occur predominantly in the early stages of processing (opening and carding) where high dust concentrations are found using the personal technique. These data support the use of personal sampling for setting exposure limits to cotton dust in preference to the current recommended method using work area sampling techniques, which may significantly underestimate dust exposure in the high risk work areas and is outdated." @default.
- W2021671205 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2021671205 creator A5003633153 @default.
- W2021671205 creator A5034401380 @default.
- W2021671205 creator A5046444908 @default.
- W2021671205 creator A5079653331 @default.
- W2021671205 creator A5084756778 @default.
- W2021671205 creator A5090573409 @default.
- W2021671205 date "1992-08-01" @default.
- W2021671205 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W2021671205 title "A STUDY OF THE PERFORMANCE AND COMPARABILITY OF THE SAMPLING RESPONSE TO COTTON DUST OF WORK AREA AND PERSONAL SAMPLING TECHNIQUES" @default.
- W2021671205 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/36.4.349" @default.
- W2021671205 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1444063" @default.
- W2021671205 hasPublicationYear "1992" @default.
- W2021671205 type Work @default.
- W2021671205 sameAs 2021671205 @default.
- W2021671205 citedByCount "21" @default.
- W2021671205 countsByYear W20216712052012 @default.
- W2021671205 countsByYear W20216712052013 @default.
- W2021671205 countsByYear W20216712052016 @default.
- W2021671205 countsByYear W20216712052022 @default.
- W2021671205 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2021671205 hasAuthorship W2021671205A5003633153 @default.
- W2021671205 hasAuthorship W2021671205A5034401380 @default.
- W2021671205 hasAuthorship W2021671205A5046444908 @default.
- W2021671205 hasAuthorship W2021671205A5079653331 @default.
- W2021671205 hasAuthorship W2021671205A5084756778 @default.
- W2021671205 hasAuthorship W2021671205A5090573409 @default.
- W2021671205 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W2021671205 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W2021671205 hasConcept C140779682 @default.
- W2021671205 hasConcept C33070731 @default.
- W2021671205 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W2021671205 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
- W2021671205 hasConcept C528095902 @default.
- W2021671205 hasConcept C76155785 @default.
- W2021671205 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2021671205 hasConcept C94915269 @default.
- W2021671205 hasConceptScore W2021671205C105795698 @default.
- W2021671205 hasConceptScore W2021671205C127413603 @default.
- W2021671205 hasConceptScore W2021671205C140779682 @default.
- W2021671205 hasConceptScore W2021671205C33070731 @default.
- W2021671205 hasConceptScore W2021671205C33923547 @default.
- W2021671205 hasConceptScore W2021671205C39432304 @default.
- W2021671205 hasConceptScore W2021671205C528095902 @default.
- W2021671205 hasConceptScore W2021671205C76155785 @default.
- W2021671205 hasConceptScore W2021671205C86803240 @default.
- W2021671205 hasConceptScore W2021671205C94915269 @default.
- W2021671205 hasLocation W20216712051 @default.
- W2021671205 hasLocation W20216712052 @default.
- W2021671205 hasOpenAccess W2021671205 @default.
- W2021671205 hasPrimaryLocation W20216712051 @default.
- W2021671205 hasRelatedWork W2043447949 @default.
- W2021671205 hasRelatedWork W2091749162 @default.
- W2021671205 hasRelatedWork W2113826745 @default.
- W2021671205 hasRelatedWork W2333391021 @default.
- W2021671205 hasRelatedWork W2552050053 @default.
- W2021671205 hasRelatedWork W3037784022 @default.
- W2021671205 hasRelatedWork W3047914590 @default.
- W2021671205 hasRelatedWork W4234996786 @default.
- W2021671205 hasRelatedWork W4246220481 @default.
- W2021671205 hasRelatedWork W4248674118 @default.
- W2021671205 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2021671205 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2021671205 magId "2021671205" @default.
- W2021671205 workType "article" @default.