Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2021736656> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2021736656 endingPage "205" @default.
- W2021736656 startingPage "192" @default.
- W2021736656 abstract "Abstract Numeracy is a critical component of decision making in health, and low numeracy may adversely affect risk comprehension, medical treatment, and health outcomes. Health researchers have developed objective and subjective measures of numeracy that potentially could be used for clinical or health research purposes. To examine the association between objective and subjective numeracy at a population level, data were obtained from the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey, a health communication survey that collects data from a nationally representative sample of the U.S. population. Associations between items from 2 published subjective numeracy measures (STAT-Confidence Scale; Subjective Numeracy Scale) and a single published objective numeracy measure were examined with respect to one another and with respect to sociodemographic characteristics using a multivariate logistic regression model. Controlling for demographic covariates, both subjective numeracy measures were significantly associated with each other (p < .0001) and with objective numeracy (p < .0001). Compared with respondents who regarded themselves as low in subjective numeracy, those who regarded themselves as high in subjective numeracy had significantly higher odds of answering the objective numeracy question correctly (STAT-Confidence Scale OR = 1.42, CI [1.07, 1.90]; Subjective Numeracy Scale OR = 1.71, CI [1.28, 2.28]). However, the subjective measures performed poorly as diagnostic indicators of objective numeracy. Sensitivity and specificity for the STAT-Confidence Scale and the Subjective Numeracy Scale were 67%/49% and 50%/71%, respectively. More work is needed to elucidate the relation between objective and subjective numeracy, at the conceptual and empirical levels, and to develop more robust measures of subjective numeracy that can better discriminate between individuals with low and high objective numeracy. Acknowledgments The authors gratefully acknowledge and thank William Waldron for his statistical expertise. Notes a Percentage of respondents who answered the objective numeracy question correctly. b Chi-square p value. c Percentage of respondents high in subjective numeracy (i.e., found it “easy” or “very easy” to understand medical statistics). d Percentage of respondents high in subjective numeracy (i.e., responded “generally prefer numbers”). This article not subject to US copyright law." @default.
- W2021736656 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2021736656 creator A5019086970 @default.
- W2021736656 creator A5038358790 @default.
- W2021736656 creator A5066036637 @default.
- W2021736656 date "2013-02-01" @default.
- W2021736656 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
- W2021736656 title "Exploring Objective and Subjective Numeracy at a Population Level: Findings From the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS)" @default.
- W2021736656 cites W1563209007 @default.
- W2021736656 cites W1965914729 @default.
- W2021736656 cites W1969207360 @default.
- W2021736656 cites W1987263246 @default.
- W2021736656 cites W1999061866 @default.
- W2021736656 cites W2005224329 @default.
- W2021736656 cites W2005339748 @default.
- W2021736656 cites W2025097148 @default.
- W2021736656 cites W2029583845 @default.
- W2021736656 cites W2034208802 @default.
- W2021736656 cites W2048105386 @default.
- W2021736656 cites W2048684036 @default.
- W2021736656 cites W2049701937 @default.
- W2021736656 cites W2074360941 @default.
- W2021736656 cites W2074816712 @default.
- W2021736656 cites W2075840706 @default.
- W2021736656 cites W2078227735 @default.
- W2021736656 cites W2081034705 @default.
- W2021736656 cites W2085294052 @default.
- W2021736656 cites W2085714022 @default.
- W2021736656 cites W2095082311 @default.
- W2021736656 cites W2098674711 @default.
- W2021736656 cites W2099246599 @default.
- W2021736656 cites W2100026878 @default.
- W2021736656 cites W2126556941 @default.
- W2021736656 cites W2129751406 @default.
- W2021736656 cites W2132183026 @default.
- W2021736656 cites W2138550232 @default.
- W2021736656 cites W2141918028 @default.
- W2021736656 cites W2143417015 @default.
- W2021736656 cites W2152288404 @default.
- W2021736656 cites W2153296805 @default.
- W2021736656 cites W2160841753 @default.
- W2021736656 cites W2165117224 @default.
- W2021736656 cites W4249260278 @default.
- W2021736656 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2012.688450" @default.
- W2021736656 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23066837" @default.
- W2021736656 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
- W2021736656 type Work @default.
- W2021736656 sameAs 2021736656 @default.
- W2021736656 citedByCount "23" @default.
- W2021736656 countsByYear W20217366562013 @default.
- W2021736656 countsByYear W20217366562014 @default.
- W2021736656 countsByYear W20217366562015 @default.
- W2021736656 countsByYear W20217366562016 @default.
- W2021736656 countsByYear W20217366562017 @default.
- W2021736656 countsByYear W20217366562018 @default.
- W2021736656 countsByYear W20217366562019 @default.
- W2021736656 countsByYear W20217366562020 @default.
- W2021736656 countsByYear W20217366562021 @default.
- W2021736656 countsByYear W20217366562022 @default.
- W2021736656 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2021736656 hasAuthorship W2021736656A5019086970 @default.
- W2021736656 hasAuthorship W2021736656A5038358790 @default.
- W2021736656 hasAuthorship W2021736656A5066036637 @default.
- W2021736656 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2021736656 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W2021736656 hasConcept C143095724 @default.
- W2021736656 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2021736656 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
- W2021736656 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
- W2021736656 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
- W2021736656 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2021736656 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
- W2021736656 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W2021736656 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
- W2021736656 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
- W2021736656 hasConcept C2778149918 @default.
- W2021736656 hasConcept C2778755073 @default.
- W2021736656 hasConcept C2778843546 @default.
- W2021736656 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
- W2021736656 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
- W2021736656 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
- W2021736656 hasConcept C53537400 @default.
- W2021736656 hasConcept C547764534 @default.
- W2021736656 hasConcept C58640448 @default.
- W2021736656 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2021736656 hasConcept C74909509 @default.
- W2021736656 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
- W2021736656 hasConceptScore W2021736656C126322002 @default.
- W2021736656 hasConceptScore W2021736656C142724271 @default.
- W2021736656 hasConceptScore W2021736656C143095724 @default.
- W2021736656 hasConceptScore W2021736656C144024400 @default.
- W2021736656 hasConceptScore W2021736656C149923435 @default.
- W2021736656 hasConceptScore W2021736656C151956035 @default.
- W2021736656 hasConceptScore W2021736656C156957248 @default.
- W2021736656 hasConceptScore W2021736656C15744967 @default.
- W2021736656 hasConceptScore W2021736656C160735492 @default.
- W2021736656 hasConceptScore W2021736656C162324750 @default.
- W2021736656 hasConceptScore W2021736656C19417346 @default.