FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2021988730> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2021988730 endingPage "127" @default.
• W2021988730 startingPage "110" @default.
• W2021988730 abstract "Enhancing communication between functions is crucial to successful product development and management. Previous work in the product innovation management literature has made two implicit assumptions. First, that increasing the frequency of information dissemination from one function to the other always improves the perceived quality of the information received. The second assumption is that all types of interfunctional communication carry equal weight in the decision-making process of the target of that communication. The current study develops a typology of communication modes, which suggests a rationale for why these assumptions may not be true. The empirical findings of the study, based on a survey of 504 nonmarketing managers indicate that the relationship between total communication frequency and perceived information quality (PIQ) is nonlinear. Specifically, the study finds that marketing managers can either communicate too little or too much with nonmarketing managers. If they interact too infrequently, they run the risk of not understanding the way to most effectively communicate market information. If they communicate too much, they may overload the manager with too much information and erode the overall quality of the information sent. In addition, some modes of communication are more effective in improving perceptions of the quality of market information. For instance, regular e-mail sent by marketing managers seems to have no effect on perceived information quality. On the other hand, e-mail sent with supporting documentation can have a strong positive effect on perceived information quality. Impromptu phone calls by marketing have less positive effects than scheduled phone calls. Interestingly, too much of the wrong types of communication actually seem to reduce perceptions of perceived information quality, and consequently the likelihood that market information will be used. The study also suggests that certain kinds of communication are better for manufacturing managers and others more effective in sharing information with R&D managers. For instance, disseminating information through written reports seems to reduce perceived information quality. This is particularly true for R&D managers. On the other hand too many meetings can reduce perceptions of PIQ, particularly on the part of manufacturing managers. Implications for theory and practice are discussed." @default.
• W2021988730 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2021988730 creator A5083146540 @default.
• W2021988730 date "2000-03-01" @default.
• W2021988730 modified "2023-10-06" @default.
• W2021988730 title "Is all communication created equal?: an investigation into the effects of communication mode on perceived information quality" @default.
• W2021988730 cites W1552759322 @default.
• W2021988730 cites W1954663826 @default.
• W2021988730 cites W2005459481 @default.
• W2021988730 cites W2030121826 @default.
• W2021988730 cites W2041599420 @default.
• W2021988730 cites W2050421803 @default.
• W2021988730 cites W2062490363 @default.
• W2021988730 cites W2072288680 @default.
• W2021988730 cites W2080453036 @default.
• W2021988730 cites W2089267254 @default.
• W2021988730 cites W2094914926 @default.
• W2021988730 cites W2099832821 @default.
• W2021988730 cites W2112725002 @default.
• W2021988730 cites W2114268129 @default.
• W2021988730 cites W2121220078 @default.
• W2021988730 cites W2132454116 @default.
• W2021988730 cites W2145173373 @default.
• W2021988730 cites W2145962555 @default.
• W2021988730 cites W2146310798 @default.
• W2021988730 cites W2150964509 @default.
• W2021988730 cites W2156613121 @default.
• W2021988730 cites W2163957896 @default.
• W2021988730 cites W2169548594 @default.
• W2021988730 cites W2326333094 @default.
• W2021988730 cites W2328783997 @default.
• W2021988730 cites W2329375110 @default.
• W2021988730 cites W2519688586 @default.
• W2021988730 cites W2797247465 @default.
• W2021988730 cites W2797532987 @default.
• W2021988730 cites W3022879724 @default.
• W2021988730 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0737-6782(99)00030-2" @default.
• W2021988730 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
• W2021988730 type Work @default.
• W2021988730 sameAs 2021988730 @default.
• W2021988730 citedByCount "94" @default.
• W2021988730 countsByYear W20219887302012 @default.
• W2021988730 countsByYear W20219887302013 @default.
• W2021988730 countsByYear W20219887302014 @default.
• W2021988730 countsByYear W20219887302015 @default.
• W2021988730 countsByYear W20219887302016 @default.
• W2021988730 countsByYear W20219887302017 @default.
• W2021988730 countsByYear W20219887302018 @default.
• W2021988730 countsByYear W20219887302019 @default.
• W2021988730 countsByYear W20219887302020 @default.
• W2021988730 countsByYear W20219887302022 @default.
• W2021988730 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2021988730 hasAuthorship W2021988730A5083146540 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConcept C119599485 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConcept C180198813 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConcept C186625053 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConcept C2778707766 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConcept C2781454322 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConcept C45983554 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConcept C90673727 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConceptScore W2021988730C111472728 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConceptScore W2021988730C119599485 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConceptScore W2021988730C127413603 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConceptScore W2021988730C136764020 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConceptScore W2021988730C138885662 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConceptScore W2021988730C144133560 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConceptScore W2021988730C15744967 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConceptScore W2021988730C162853370 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConceptScore W2021988730C169760540 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConceptScore W2021988730C180198813 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConceptScore W2021988730C186625053 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConceptScore W2021988730C199360897 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConceptScore W2021988730C2524010 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConceptScore W2021988730C26760741 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConceptScore W2021988730C2778707766 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConceptScore W2021988730C2779530757 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConceptScore W2021988730C2781454322 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConceptScore W2021988730C33923547 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConceptScore W2021988730C41008148 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConceptScore W2021988730C41895202 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConceptScore W2021988730C45983554 @default.
• W2021988730 hasConceptScore W2021988730C90673727 @default.
• W2021988730 hasIssue "2" @default.

• next