FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2022050439> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2022050439 endingPage "e98" @default.
• W2022050439 startingPage "e98" @default.
• W2022050439 abstract "Editor, There is increasing debate about the pros and cons of sutureless microincision transconjunctival vitrectomy (TSV) surgery (Grosso & Panico 2009) in the macular surgery. The 23-gauge TSV surgery was introduced to our Retina Service in October 2005. All patients underwent single-step 3-port 23-gauge core vitrectomy dye-assisted (triamcinolone acetonide to identify the hyaloid + infracyanine green to identify the internal limiting membrane) using Accurus or Dorc Vitrector. The 23-G vitrectomy system (3D mode) was set at a cutting speed of 2500–1800 cuts per minute, infusion pressure of 20 or 40 mmHg and aspiration pressure from 40 to 350–450 mmHg. All procedures were performed under the DORC (Zuidalnd–Holland) disposable flat vitrectomy lens (Cod DR 1284 –DD), in local anaesthesia. Postoperative retinal detachment occurred in two of the 166 consecutive eyes (median age 70, 95 M, 71 F) after 23-gauge TSV surgery (1.2%) in idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery from October 2005 to May 2009. The retinal detachment is a serious complication after vitrectomy, especially for macular surgery. In recent series of patients who underwent 23-gauge vitrectomy study for epiretinal membrane surgery, the retinal detachment occurred from 0% (Hikichi et al. 2009) to 1.6% of cases. (Haas et al. 2010) The incidence of postoperative retinal detachment following 25-gauge vitrectomy surgery is also reported low in the literature. (Tan et al. 2009). We have retrospectively analysed the clinical charts of patients, and we have found that the two cases of retinal detachment occurred in the first consecutive subgroup of patients. The pathogenesis of retinal detachment in small-gauge vitrectomy can be correlated to the following factors (Parolini et al. 2010): Type of vitrectomy and induction of iatrogenic breaks: incomplete vitrectomy, i.e. core vitrectomy versus vitrectomy as complete as possible plus endolaser; aspiration power and type of duty cycle. We analysed each of these different factors: We perform a core vitrectomy, and therefore a criticism of the technique could be that the residual vitreous in the periphery may cause retinal tractions. However, we have not found retinal breaks at the site of sclerotomies in our series after a scrupulous full 360-degree internal search at the end of each procedure. We know that the duty cycle is extremely important because it may determine possible vitreous traction and consequently retinal tears. Therefore, we set the aspiration flow up to maximum 350 mmHg instead of 450 mmHg after the first 50 cases. Since this modification, no other cases of retinal detachment occurred. We are uncertain about the role of the internal tamponade: some surgeons claim that a BSS – air exchange may help to close the sclerotomies and reduce the risk of postoperative retinal detachment, but further studies are required to validate these preliminary data. We think it is important to share our surgical experience with the scientific community. Further, we are aware about the possible bias publication when we deal with negative results in new surgical techniques. In conclusion, the 23-gauge core vitrectomy with aspiration power of maximum 350 mmHg is a safe technique to treat idiopathic epiretinal membranes. This Study was supported by Compagnia di San Paolo, Torino, Italy (protocollo n 29 SD/FA 2007.3149)." @default.
• W2022050439 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2022050439 creator A5038879415 @default.
• W2022050439 creator A5055443128 @default.
• W2022050439 date "2010-05-14" @default.
• W2022050439 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2022050439 title "Incidence of retinal detachment following 23-gauge vitrectomy in idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery" @default.
• W2022050439 cites W1509319862 @default.
• W2022050439 cites W2002203498 @default.
• W2022050439 cites W2075163477 @default.
• W2022050439 cites W2077025989 @default.
• W2022050439 cites W2118082218 @default.
• W2022050439 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.01928.x" @default.
• W2022050439 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20491690" @default.
• W2022050439 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2022050439 type Work @default.
• W2022050439 sameAs 2022050439 @default.
• W2022050439 citedByCount "10" @default.
• W2022050439 countsByYear W20220504392012 @default.
• W2022050439 countsByYear W20220504392013 @default.
• W2022050439 countsByYear W20220504392016 @default.
• W2022050439 countsByYear W20220504392017 @default.
• W2022050439 countsByYear W20220504392018 @default.
• W2022050439 countsByYear W20220504392019 @default.
• W2022050439 countsByYear W20220504392020 @default.
• W2022050439 countsByYear W20220504392021 @default.
• W2022050439 countsByYear W20220504392022 @default.
• W2022050439 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2022050439 hasAuthorship W2022050439A5038879415 @default.
• W2022050439 hasAuthorship W2022050439A5055443128 @default.
• W2022050439 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
• W2022050439 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2022050439 hasConcept C2777063560 @default.
• W2022050439 hasConcept C2777344775 @default.
• W2022050439 hasConcept C2778257484 @default.
• W2022050439 hasConcept C2778903070 @default.
• W2022050439 hasConcept C2780428090 @default.
• W2022050439 hasConcept C2780827179 @default.
• W2022050439 hasConcept C2781242345 @default.
• W2022050439 hasConcept C2781325737 @default.
• W2022050439 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2022050439 hasConceptScore W2022050439C118487528 @default.
• W2022050439 hasConceptScore W2022050439C141071460 @default.
• W2022050439 hasConceptScore W2022050439C2777063560 @default.
• W2022050439 hasConceptScore W2022050439C2777344775 @default.
• W2022050439 hasConceptScore W2022050439C2778257484 @default.
• W2022050439 hasConceptScore W2022050439C2778903070 @default.
• W2022050439 hasConceptScore W2022050439C2780428090 @default.
• W2022050439 hasConceptScore W2022050439C2780827179 @default.
• W2022050439 hasConceptScore W2022050439C2781242345 @default.
• W2022050439 hasConceptScore W2022050439C2781325737 @default.
• W2022050439 hasConceptScore W2022050439C71924100 @default.
• W2022050439 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2022050439 hasLocation W20220504391 @default.
• W2022050439 hasLocation W20220504392 @default.
• W2022050439 hasOpenAccess W2022050439 @default.
• W2022050439 hasPrimaryLocation W20220504391 @default.
• W2022050439 hasRelatedWork W1159932995 @default.
• W2022050439 hasRelatedWork W2054039485 @default.
• W2022050439 hasRelatedWork W2058571393 @default.
• W2022050439 hasRelatedWork W2357243497 @default.
• W2022050439 hasRelatedWork W2367238733 @default.
• W2022050439 hasRelatedWork W2421712405 @default.
• W2022050439 hasRelatedWork W3031268127 @default.
• W2022050439 hasRelatedWork W3032637066 @default.
• W2022050439 hasRelatedWork W3153321019 @default.
• W2022050439 hasRelatedWork W4319318398 @default.
• W2022050439 hasVolume "89" @default.
• W2022050439 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2022050439 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2022050439 magId "2022050439" @default.
• W2022050439 workType "article" @default.