FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2022096693> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2022096693 endingPage "265" @default.
• W2022096693 startingPage "259" @default.
• W2022096693 abstract "Training procedures for dermatology residents have never been evaluated in French university hospitals. The present study describes the methods used over the last 5 years.This was a retrospective survey using a questionnaire sent to French dermatology-residents completing their residency between 2005 and 2010. The data collated included information on theoretical aspects (courses, local, regional or national seminars, meetings) and on practical training (consultations, surgery, laser and cosmetic dermatology), research, post-residency assistantship and additional university diplomas, as well as overall opinions on dermatology training. Statistical analysis was descriptive and comparative according to the number of dermatology teachers (professors, senior lecturers) in the region in which training was given.One hundred and twenty-two questionnaires were analyzed: 72 from regions with two or less than two university hospital dermatology teachers (group 1) and 50 with more than two such teachers (group 2). Fewer residents had completed a research year in group 1 (19% vs 40%; P=0.01), but the two groups were comparable concerning post-graduate training (DESC) (16%) or post-residency (87%) placement. There were no differences concerning local theoretical training or participation in seminars or meetings, apart from inter-regional seminars, which were more frequent in group 2 (24% vs 3%; P<0.001). There were no differences between the two groups in terms of personal consultations (91%), surgery (62%), laser treatment (13%) or cosmetic dermatology (3%). Satisfaction rates regarding theoretical and practical training were similar in both groups (69% vs 70% and 72% vs 78%, respectively).This is the first survey carried out with the aim of evaluating suitability of training for dermatology residents in France with regard to the reference dermatological practice recently submitted to the French health ministry. The present results, obtained from 47% of residents receiving training during this period, show only very few differences concerning dermatology residency training with respect to the number of university hospital dermatology teachers, apart from research training.Despite an overall good opinion on their residency, the dermatology residents involved underlined the need for greater focus on teaching of technical skills (surgery, laser, cosmetic dermatology)." @default.
• W2022096693 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2022096693 creator A5002644565 @default.
• W2022096693 creator A5026346343 @default.
• W2022096693 creator A5044391134 @default.
• W2022096693 creator A5066356798 @default.
• W2022096693 creator A5070824849 @default.
• W2022096693 date "2013-04-01" @default.
• W2022096693 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2022096693 title "État des lieux de la formation des internes en DES de dermato-vénéréologie en France (2005–2010)" @default.
• W2022096693 cites W1902731480 @default.
• W2022096693 cites W1981154986 @default.
• W2022096693 cites W2036276692 @default.
• W2022096693 cites W2083700754 @default.
• W2022096693 cites W2085237707 @default.
• W2022096693 cites W2093060360 @default.
• W2022096693 cites W2163352160 @default.
• W2022096693 cites W2135075585 @default.
• W2022096693 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annder.2012.11.011" @default.
• W2022096693 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23567226" @default.
• W2022096693 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2022096693 type Work @default.
• W2022096693 sameAs 2022096693 @default.
• W2022096693 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W2022096693 countsByYear W20220966932013 @default.
• W2022096693 countsByYear W20220966932014 @default.
• W2022096693 countsByYear W20220966932015 @default.
• W2022096693 countsByYear W20220966932016 @default.
• W2022096693 countsByYear W20220966932017 @default.
• W2022096693 countsByYear W20220966932018 @default.
• W2022096693 countsByYear W20220966932022 @default.
• W2022096693 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2022096693 hasAuthorship W2022096693A5002644565 @default.
• W2022096693 hasAuthorship W2022096693A5026346343 @default.
• W2022096693 hasAuthorship W2022096693A5044391134 @default.
• W2022096693 hasAuthorship W2022096693A5066356798 @default.
• W2022096693 hasAuthorship W2022096693A5070824849 @default.
• W2022096693 hasConcept C2988064887 @default.
• W2022096693 hasConcept C3019285220 @default.
• W2022096693 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2022096693 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2022096693 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2022096693 hasConceptScore W2022096693C2988064887 @default.
• W2022096693 hasConceptScore W2022096693C3019285220 @default.
• W2022096693 hasConceptScore W2022096693C509550671 @default.
• W2022096693 hasConceptScore W2022096693C512399662 @default.
• W2022096693 hasConceptScore W2022096693C71924100 @default.
• W2022096693 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2022096693 hasLocation W20220966931 @default.
• W2022096693 hasLocation W20220966932 @default.
• W2022096693 hasOpenAccess W2022096693 @default.
• W2022096693 hasPrimaryLocation W20220966931 @default.
• W2022096693 hasRelatedWork W2069198136 @default.
• W2022096693 hasRelatedWork W2072869664 @default.
• W2022096693 hasRelatedWork W2082890172 @default.
• W2022096693 hasRelatedWork W2408861237 @default.
• W2022096693 hasRelatedWork W2411901573 @default.
• W2022096693 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2022096693 hasRelatedWork W3030995635 @default.
• W2022096693 hasRelatedWork W4245975910 @default.
• W2022096693 hasRelatedWork W627907749 @default.
• W2022096693 hasRelatedWork W2487508718 @default.
• W2022096693 hasVolume "140" @default.
• W2022096693 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2022096693 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2022096693 magId "2022096693" @default.
• W2022096693 workType "article" @default.