FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2022126688> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2022126688 endingPage "802" @default.
• W2022126688 startingPage "796" @default.
• W2022126688 abstract "Introduction The purpose of this study was to compare faculty ratings between live versus video-recorded resident performances and faculty versus skills coaches' ratings of video-recorded resident performances. Methods PGY1 residents were observed, video-recorded, and rated during a Verification of Proficiency examination on 4 stations (ie, suturing, laparotomy, central line, and cricothyroidotomy). One surgeon and 2 trained skills coaches independently rated each video-recorded performance (N = 25). The chi-square test was used to compare checklist ratings. Analysis of variance was used to compare global ratings. Intraclass correlations were used to evaluate inter-rater agreement. Results There were no statistical differences in faculty checklist ratings for live versus video-recorded performances (P > .05), and we found a nearly perfect interrater agreement, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.99 (P < .001). When comparing faculty versus skills coaches' ratings on video-recorded performances, we found no differences for the global or checklist ratings. Inter-rater agreement was moderately high for the global ratings, ICC = 0.71 (P <. 0.01, 95% confidence interval 0.23–0.96), and nearly perfect for the checklist ratings, ICC = 0.99 (P < .001, 95% confidence interval 0.94–1.00). Conclusion When assessing residents' performances, use of video-recorded performance ratings and skills coaches may be viable alternatives to live ratings performed by surgical faculty. The purpose of this study was to compare faculty ratings between live versus video-recorded resident performances and faculty versus skills coaches' ratings of video-recorded resident performances. PGY1 residents were observed, video-recorded, and rated during a Verification of Proficiency examination on 4 stations (ie, suturing, laparotomy, central line, and cricothyroidotomy). One surgeon and 2 trained skills coaches independently rated each video-recorded performance (N = 25). The chi-square test was used to compare checklist ratings. Analysis of variance was used to compare global ratings. Intraclass correlations were used to evaluate inter-rater agreement. There were no statistical differences in faculty checklist ratings for live versus video-recorded performances (P > .05), and we found a nearly perfect interrater agreement, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.99 (P < .001). When comparing faculty versus skills coaches' ratings on video-recorded performances, we found no differences for the global or checklist ratings. Inter-rater agreement was moderately high for the global ratings, ICC = 0.71 (P <. 0.01, 95% confidence interval 0.23–0.96), and nearly perfect for the checklist ratings, ICC = 0.99 (P < .001, 95% confidence interval 0.94–1.00). When assessing residents' performances, use of video-recorded performance ratings and skills coaches may be viable alternatives to live ratings performed by surgical faculty." @default.
• W2022126688 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2022126688 creator A5010870510 @default.
• W2022126688 creator A5012094828 @default.
• W2022126688 creator A5027178824 @default.
• W2022126688 creator A5041116563 @default.
• W2022126688 date "2012-06-01" @default.
• W2022126688 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2022126688 title "Can skills coaches be used to assess resident performance in the skills laboratory?" @default.
• W2022126688 cites W1968839267 @default.
• W2022126688 cites W1990352175 @default.
• W2022126688 cites W1997480555 @default.
• W2022126688 cites W2031570967 @default.
• W2022126688 cites W2037552319 @default.
• W2022126688 cites W2054158336 @default.
• W2022126688 cites W2072616512 @default.
• W2022126688 cites W2077960418 @default.
• W2022126688 cites W2081503431 @default.
• W2022126688 cites W2086823319 @default.
• W2022126688 cites W2087457532 @default.
• W2022126688 cites W2100089544 @default.
• W2022126688 cites W2117093651 @default.
• W2022126688 cites W2133450804 @default.
• W2022126688 cites W2169290686 @default.
• W2022126688 cites W2173275502 @default.
• W2022126688 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2012.03.016" @default.
• W2022126688 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22652120" @default.
• W2022126688 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2022126688 type Work @default.
• W2022126688 sameAs 2022126688 @default.
• W2022126688 citedByCount "10" @default.
• W2022126688 countsByYear W20221266882013 @default.
• W2022126688 countsByYear W20221266882015 @default.
• W2022126688 countsByYear W20221266882017 @default.
• W2022126688 countsByYear W20221266882018 @default.
• W2022126688 countsByYear W20221266882019 @default.
• W2022126688 countsByYear W20221266882020 @default.
• W2022126688 countsByYear W20221266882021 @default.
• W2022126688 countsByYear W20221266882023 @default.
• W2022126688 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2022126688 hasAuthorship W2022126688A5010870510 @default.
• W2022126688 hasAuthorship W2022126688A5012094828 @default.
• W2022126688 hasAuthorship W2022126688A5027178824 @default.
• W2022126688 hasAuthorship W2022126688A5041116563 @default.
• W2022126688 hasConcept C104709138 @default.
• W2022126688 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2022126688 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W2022126688 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2022126688 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
• W2022126688 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2022126688 hasConcept C2779356329 @default.
• W2022126688 hasConcept C2988634675 @default.
• W2022126688 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2022126688 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2022126688 hasConcept C49774154 @default.
• W2022126688 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2022126688 hasConcept C61863361 @default.
• W2022126688 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2022126688 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2022126688 hasConcept C83849319 @default.
• W2022126688 hasConceptScore W2022126688C104709138 @default.
• W2022126688 hasConceptScore W2022126688C126322002 @default.
• W2022126688 hasConceptScore W2022126688C138496976 @default.
• W2022126688 hasConceptScore W2022126688C15744967 @default.
• W2022126688 hasConceptScore W2022126688C171606756 @default.
• W2022126688 hasConceptScore W2022126688C180747234 @default.
• W2022126688 hasConceptScore W2022126688C2779356329 @default.
• W2022126688 hasConceptScore W2022126688C2988634675 @default.
• W2022126688 hasConceptScore W2022126688C41008148 @default.
• W2022126688 hasConceptScore W2022126688C44249647 @default.
• W2022126688 hasConceptScore W2022126688C49774154 @default.
• W2022126688 hasConceptScore W2022126688C509550671 @default.
• W2022126688 hasConceptScore W2022126688C61863361 @default.
• W2022126688 hasConceptScore W2022126688C70410870 @default.
• W2022126688 hasConceptScore W2022126688C71924100 @default.
• W2022126688 hasConceptScore W2022126688C83849319 @default.
• W2022126688 hasFunder F4320321443 @default.
• W2022126688 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2022126688 hasLocation W20221266881 @default.
• W2022126688 hasLocation W20221266882 @default.
• W2022126688 hasOpenAccess W2022126688 @default.
• W2022126688 hasPrimaryLocation W20221266881 @default.
• W2022126688 hasRelatedWork W1528943059 @default.
• W2022126688 hasRelatedWork W1993050967 @default.
• W2022126688 hasRelatedWork W2020618060 @default.
• W2022126688 hasRelatedWork W2022126688 @default.
• W2022126688 hasRelatedWork W2035031689 @default.
• W2022126688 hasRelatedWork W2063208098 @default.
• W2022126688 hasRelatedWork W2164944198 @default.
• W2022126688 hasRelatedWork W2181551434 @default.
• W2022126688 hasRelatedWork W2257411045 @default.
• W2022126688 hasRelatedWork W4231774731 @default.
• W2022126688 hasVolume "151" @default.
• W2022126688 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2022126688 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2022126688 magId "2022126688" @default.
• W2022126688 workType "article" @default.