FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2022147577> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2022147577 endingPage "483" @default.
• W2022147577 startingPage "480" @default.
• W2022147577 abstract "Introduction: In orthodontics, facial esthetics is assumed to be related to golden proportions apparent in the ideal human face. The aim of the study was to analyze the putative relationship between facial esthetics and golden proportions in white adolescents. Methods: Seventy-six adult laypeople evaluated sets of photographs of 64 adolescents on a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 to 100. The facial esthetic value of each subject was calculated as a mean VAS score. Three observers recorded the position of 13 facial landmarks included in 19 putative golden proportions, based on the golden proportions as defined by Ricketts. The proportions and each proportion's deviation from the golden target (1.618) were calculated. This deviation was then related to the VAS scores. Results: Only 4 of the 19 proportions had a significant negative correlation with the VAS scores, indicating that beautiful faces showed less deviation from the golden standard than less beautiful faces. Together, these variables explained only 16% of the variance. Conclusions: Few golden proportions have a significant relationship with facial esthetics in adolescents. The explained variance of these variables is too small to be of clinical importance. Introduction: In orthodontics, facial esthetics is assumed to be related to golden proportions apparent in the ideal human face. The aim of the study was to analyze the putative relationship between facial esthetics and golden proportions in white adolescents. Methods: Seventy-six adult laypeople evaluated sets of photographs of 64 adolescents on a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 to 100. The facial esthetic value of each subject was calculated as a mean VAS score. Three observers recorded the position of 13 facial landmarks included in 19 putative golden proportions, based on the golden proportions as defined by Ricketts. The proportions and each proportion's deviation from the golden target (1.618) were calculated. This deviation was then related to the VAS scores. Results: Only 4 of the 19 proportions had a significant negative correlation with the VAS scores, indicating that beautiful faces showed less deviation from the golden standard than less beautiful faces. Together, these variables explained only 16% of the variance. Conclusions: Few golden proportions have a significant relationship with facial esthetics in adolescents. The explained variance of these variables is too small to be of clinical importance." @default.
• W2022147577 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2022147577 creator A5008665136 @default.
• W2022147577 creator A5015720312 @default.
• W2022147577 creator A5027213544 @default.
• W2022147577 creator A5028356930 @default.
• W2022147577 creator A5045447876 @default.
• W2022147577 date "2008-10-01" @default.
• W2022147577 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2022147577 title "Putative golden proportions as predictors of facial esthetics in adolescents" @default.
• W2022147577 cites W186791209 @default.
• W2022147577 cites W1982001094 @default.
• W2022147577 cites W2014241723 @default.
• W2022147577 cites W2030167381 @default.
• W2022147577 cites W2077445135 @default.
• W2022147577 cites W2116544388 @default.
• W2022147577 cites W2117476716 @default.
• W2022147577 cites W2128435954 @default.
• W2022147577 cites W4232531180 @default.
• W2022147577 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.10.041" @default.
• W2022147577 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18929264" @default.
• W2022147577 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2022147577 type Work @default.
• W2022147577 sameAs 2022147577 @default.
• W2022147577 citedByCount "57" @default.
• W2022147577 countsByYear W20221475772012 @default.
• W2022147577 countsByYear W20221475772013 @default.
• W2022147577 countsByYear W20221475772014 @default.
• W2022147577 countsByYear W20221475772015 @default.
• W2022147577 countsByYear W20221475772016 @default.
• W2022147577 countsByYear W20221475772017 @default.
• W2022147577 countsByYear W20221475772018 @default.
• W2022147577 countsByYear W20221475772019 @default.
• W2022147577 countsByYear W20221475772020 @default.
• W2022147577 countsByYear W20221475772021 @default.
• W2022147577 countsByYear W20221475772022 @default.
• W2022147577 countsByYear W20221475772023 @default.
• W2022147577 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2022147577 hasAuthorship W2022147577A5008665136 @default.
• W2022147577 hasAuthorship W2022147577A5015720312 @default.
• W2022147577 hasAuthorship W2022147577A5027213544 @default.
• W2022147577 hasAuthorship W2022147577A5028356930 @default.
• W2022147577 hasAuthorship W2022147577A5045447876 @default.
• W2022147577 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2022147577 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2022147577 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W2022147577 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2022147577 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2022147577 hasConcept C18802822 @default.
• W2022147577 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2022147577 hasConcept C22679943 @default.
• W2022147577 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2022147577 hasConcept C2779304628 @default.
• W2022147577 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2022147577 hasConcept C2988626262 @default.
• W2022147577 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2022147577 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2022147577 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2022147577 hasConceptScore W2022147577C105795698 @default.
• W2022147577 hasConceptScore W2022147577C141071460 @default.
• W2022147577 hasConceptScore W2022147577C14184104 @default.
• W2022147577 hasConceptScore W2022147577C144024400 @default.
• W2022147577 hasConceptScore W2022147577C15744967 @default.
• W2022147577 hasConceptScore W2022147577C18802822 @default.
• W2022147577 hasConceptScore W2022147577C199343813 @default.
• W2022147577 hasConceptScore W2022147577C22679943 @default.
• W2022147577 hasConceptScore W2022147577C2524010 @default.
• W2022147577 hasConceptScore W2022147577C2779304628 @default.
• W2022147577 hasConceptScore W2022147577C29694066 @default.
• W2022147577 hasConceptScore W2022147577C2988626262 @default.
• W2022147577 hasConceptScore W2022147577C33923547 @default.
• W2022147577 hasConceptScore W2022147577C36289849 @default.
• W2022147577 hasConceptScore W2022147577C71924100 @default.
• W2022147577 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2022147577 hasLocation W20221475771 @default.
• W2022147577 hasLocation W20221475772 @default.
• W2022147577 hasOpenAccess W2022147577 @default.
• W2022147577 hasPrimaryLocation W20221475771 @default.
• W2022147577 hasRelatedWork W129704017 @default.
• W2022147577 hasRelatedWork W1987392569 @default.
• W2022147577 hasRelatedWork W2054403964 @default.
• W2022147577 hasRelatedWork W2128244667 @default.
• W2022147577 hasRelatedWork W2345682820 @default.
• W2022147577 hasRelatedWork W2361086037 @default.
• W2022147577 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2022147577 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2022147577 hasRelatedWork W2947402419 @default.
• W2022147577 hasRelatedWork W80443364 @default.
• W2022147577 hasVolume "134" @default.
• W2022147577 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2022147577 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2022147577 magId "2022147577" @default.
• W2022147577 workType "article" @default.