Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2022151325> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 46 of
46
with 100 items per page.
- W2022151325 abstract "This experimental study correlated varying methods of nerve repair with the degree of functional return using the rat sciatic nerve as a model. Six groups of adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (300 to 350 g) had their left sciatic nerve crushed (Group 1), transected and not repaired (Group 6), or transected and repaired using four methods that varied the degree of axonal alignment (Groups 2, 3, 4, and 5). Functional return was evaluated weekly using the sciatic functional index (SFI) and histology. Group 1 (crush) had a significantly better functional return than the other groups (p less than .001). Group 6 (no repair) had a significantly worse functional return than the other groups (p less than .001). Groups 2, 3, 4, and 5, regardless of the precision of axonal alignment, experienced the same degree of functional return (p less than .05). In all groups, with the exception of Group 1 (crush), the degree of functional return was poor. As multiple modifications in conventional microsurgical neurorrhaphy have not resulted in a significant functional improvement, factors not addressed by current techniques apparently compromise clinical results. Further improvement in the results of neurorrhaphy will require modifications in our techniques beyond presently conventional microsurgical methods." @default.
- W2022151325 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2022151325 creator A5025854647 @default.
- W2022151325 creator A5037709079 @default.
- W2022151325 creator A5070513606 @default.
- W2022151325 date "1990-01-01" @default.
- W2022151325 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
- W2022151325 title "The Relationship of Functional Return to Varying Methods of Nerve Repair" @default.
- W2022151325 doi "https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1006804" @default.
- W2022151325 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2308130" @default.
- W2022151325 hasPublicationYear "1990" @default.
- W2022151325 type Work @default.
- W2022151325 sameAs 2022151325 @default.
- W2022151325 citedByCount "30" @default.
- W2022151325 countsByYear W20221513252013 @default.
- W2022151325 countsByYear W20221513252020 @default.
- W2022151325 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2022151325 hasAuthorship W2022151325A5025854647 @default.
- W2022151325 hasAuthorship W2022151325A5037709079 @default.
- W2022151325 hasAuthorship W2022151325A5070513606 @default.
- W2022151325 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
- W2022151325 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2022151325 hasConcept C2781149210 @default.
- W2022151325 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2022151325 hasConceptScore W2022151325C105702510 @default.
- W2022151325 hasConceptScore W2022151325C141071460 @default.
- W2022151325 hasConceptScore W2022151325C2781149210 @default.
- W2022151325 hasConceptScore W2022151325C71924100 @default.
- W2022151325 hasLocation W20221513251 @default.
- W2022151325 hasLocation W20221513252 @default.
- W2022151325 hasOpenAccess W2022151325 @default.
- W2022151325 hasPrimaryLocation W20221513251 @default.
- W2022151325 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
- W2022151325 hasRelatedWork W2019517015 @default.
- W2022151325 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
- W2022151325 hasRelatedWork W2364998975 @default.
- W2022151325 hasRelatedWork W2368538328 @default.
- W2022151325 hasRelatedWork W2369162477 @default.
- W2022151325 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
- W2022151325 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
- W2022151325 hasRelatedWork W2519357708 @default.
- W2022151325 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
- W2022151325 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2022151325 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2022151325 magId "2022151325" @default.
- W2022151325 workType "article" @default.