FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2022177939> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2022177939 endingPage "729" @default.
• W2022177939 startingPage "724" @default.
• W2022177939 abstract "In Brief Objective: To analyze the potential effects of preoperative age on postoperative weight loss in patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) with long-term follow-up data. Background: The reasons for individual differences in surgically induced weight loss are not completely understood. To date, there are no available studies specifically aimed at analyzing the effects of age on weight loss in patients undergoing the same operation and with long-term follow-up data. Methods: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data for all patients who underwent RYGBP between 2006 and 2010. To evaluate weight loss, we used preoperative and follow-up body mass index (BMI), analyzed by the mixed-effects linear model for repeated measures. To evaluate age effects, patients were classified in quartiles (≤35 years, 36–42 years, 43–51 years, ≥52 years). Results: A total of 489 patients entered the study; preoperatively, the younger group showed a significantly higher BMI (mean BMI: 48.2 in patients aged ≤35 years, 46.9 in 36–42 years, 45.5 in 43–51 years, 45.7 in ≥52 years, P = 0.014) and a higher percentage of super-obesity (41.6% among patients aged ≤35 years, 28.1% among 36–42 years, 27.6% among 43–51 years, 28.3% among ≥ 52 years, P = 0.047). In spite of this, younger patients experienced a significantly greater and prolonged BMI decrease during the entire follow-up period and the BMI trend over time resulted significantly modified according to age quartiles (P = 0.036). Conclusions: This study provides a new prognostic factor in bariatric surgery: patient age. Because advanced age represents a risk factor for complications and mortality, and given that bariatric surgery may not be as effective in older patients compared to younger subjects, we believe that surgical indications in patients older than 50 years should be carefully weighed up. Surgically induced weight reduction shows great disparities among patients, with a consistent minority of them failing to achieve successful weight loss. The aim of the present study was to analyze the potential effects of the patient's age on weight loss in a large cohort of patients with long-term follow-up. We found a significantly greater and prolonged body mass index decrease in patients aged younger than 52 years, thus identifying patient age as a new prognostic factor in bariatric surgery." @default.
• W2022177939 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2022177939 creator A5013790293 @default.
• W2022177939 creator A5039214771 @default.
• W2022177939 creator A5066038668 @default.
• W2022177939 creator A5076225721 @default.
• W2022177939 creator A5087229841 @default.
• W2022177939 date "2012-11-01" @default.
• W2022177939 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2022177939 title "Age as a Long-Term Prognostic Factor in Bariatric Surgery" @default.
• W2022177939 cites W1964679987 @default.
• W2022177939 cites W1965387366 @default.
• W2022177939 cites W1968812865 @default.
• W2022177939 cites W1971927979 @default.
• W2022177939 cites W1974155177 @default.
• W2022177939 cites W1986666813 @default.
• W2022177939 cites W1998028217 @default.
• W2022177939 cites W2003931284 @default.
• W2022177939 cites W2005605028 @default.
• W2022177939 cites W2018984560 @default.
• W2022177939 cites W2023601754 @default.
• W2022177939 cites W2023715265 @default.
• W2022177939 cites W2025375061 @default.
• W2022177939 cites W2033688171 @default.
• W2022177939 cites W2046928570 @default.
• W2022177939 cites W2049978953 @default.
• W2022177939 cites W2050315781 @default.
• W2022177939 cites W2052059202 @default.
• W2022177939 cites W2055505971 @default.
• W2022177939 cites W2059502536 @default.
• W2022177939 cites W2071451595 @default.
• W2022177939 cites W2086367664 @default.
• W2022177939 cites W2087139888 @default.
• W2022177939 cites W2088379069 @default.
• W2022177939 cites W2090946733 @default.
• W2022177939 cites W2097706016 @default.
• W2022177939 cites W2101316711 @default.
• W2022177939 cites W2106864651 @default.
• W2022177939 cites W2110791445 @default.
• W2022177939 cites W2120827510 @default.
• W2022177939 cites W2128916454 @default.
• W2022177939 cites W2132489926 @default.
• W2022177939 cites W2148341902 @default.
• W2022177939 cites W2154914473 @default.
• W2022177939 cites W2160825168 @default.
• W2022177939 cites W96753348 @default.
• W2022177939 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3182734113" @default.
• W2022177939 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23095615" @default.
• W2022177939 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2022177939 type Work @default.
• W2022177939 sameAs 2022177939 @default.
• W2022177939 citedByCount "99" @default.
• W2022177939 countsByYear W20221779392013 @default.
• W2022177939 countsByYear W20221779392014 @default.
• W2022177939 countsByYear W20221779392015 @default.
• W2022177939 countsByYear W20221779392016 @default.
• W2022177939 countsByYear W20221779392017 @default.
• W2022177939 countsByYear W20221779392018 @default.
• W2022177939 countsByYear W20221779392019 @default.
• W2022177939 countsByYear W20221779392020 @default.
• W2022177939 countsByYear W20221779392021 @default.
• W2022177939 countsByYear W20221779392022 @default.
• W2022177939 countsByYear W20221779392023 @default.
• W2022177939 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2022177939 hasAuthorship W2022177939A5013790293 @default.
• W2022177939 hasAuthorship W2022177939A5039214771 @default.
• W2022177939 hasAuthorship W2022177939A5066038668 @default.
• W2022177939 hasAuthorship W2022177939A5076225721 @default.
• W2022177939 hasAuthorship W2022177939A5087229841 @default.
• W2022177939 hasBestOaLocation W20221779392 @default.
• W2022177939 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2022177939 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2022177939 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2022177939 hasConcept C187212893 @default.
• W2022177939 hasConcept C2780221984 @default.
• W2022177939 hasConcept C3019402062 @default.
• W2022177939 hasConcept C3020598108 @default.
• W2022177939 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2022177939 hasConcept C511355011 @default.
• W2022177939 hasConcept C544821477 @default.
• W2022177939 hasConcept C68443243 @default.
• W2022177939 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2022177939 hasConceptScore W2022177939C126322002 @default.
• W2022177939 hasConceptScore W2022177939C141071460 @default.
• W2022177939 hasConceptScore W2022177939C167135981 @default.
• W2022177939 hasConceptScore W2022177939C187212893 @default.
• W2022177939 hasConceptScore W2022177939C2780221984 @default.
• W2022177939 hasConceptScore W2022177939C3019402062 @default.
• W2022177939 hasConceptScore W2022177939C3020598108 @default.
• W2022177939 hasConceptScore W2022177939C44249647 @default.
• W2022177939 hasConceptScore W2022177939C511355011 @default.
• W2022177939 hasConceptScore W2022177939C544821477 @default.
• W2022177939 hasConceptScore W2022177939C68443243 @default.
• W2022177939 hasConceptScore W2022177939C71924100 @default.
• W2022177939 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2022177939 hasLocation W20221779391 @default.
• W2022177939 hasLocation W20221779392 @default.
• W2022177939 hasLocation W20221779393 @default.

• next