FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2022191908> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2022191908 endingPage "216" @default.
• W2022191908 startingPage "211" @default.
• W2022191908 abstract "Background The US dermatology workforce, which is affected by a physician shortage, has reportedly seen a rapid and substantial influx of physician assistants (PAs) and nurse practitioners (NPs). Little is known about which dermatology practices use these practitioners, how they are supervised, and the services they are providing. Methods We analyzed results of the American Academy of Dermatology's 2007 practice profile survey to learn more about patterns of nonphysician clinician (NPC) use. Of 3965 surveys mailed, responses were obtained from 1243 dermatologists (31% response rate). Comparison data were drawn from previous surveys conducted with a similar methodology in 2002 (35% response rate) and 2005 (30% response rate). Results Overall, 325 responding dermatologists (29.6%) reported using PAs, NPs, or both in their practices in 2007, a 43% increase from the proportion in 2002 (20.7%). PAs were more prevalent than NPs (23% vs 10%). By the year 2010, 36.2% of respondents plan to hire these NPCs. Younger cohorts of dermatologists were significantly more likely to use NPCs (P = .006), as were those in group and academic practices (P < .0001). Respondents seeking to hire additional dermatologists (P < .0001) and those with surgical or cosmetically focused practices (P < .001) were much more likely to use NPCs. Respondents reported supervising their NPCs on-site 92.8% of the time, but 31% were off-site 10% of the time or more. Most dermatologists allowed their NPCs to see new patients and established patients with new problems, and a minority of these patients were formally presented to a physician during extender visits. NPCs spent the majority of their time seeing medical dermatology patients, even if their supervising dermatologist was primarily engaged in surgical or cosmetic dermatology. Limitations Survey respondents might have inaccurately reported practice characteristics or might not be representative of all US dermatologists. Conclusions In the setting of persistently long patient wait times and difficulty recruiting new physician staff, dermatologists have rapidly turned to PAs and NPs to help meet patient demand for care. These NPCs are primarily caring for new and established medical dermatology patients under indirect supervision. In the absence of explicit consensus or policy as to how the field should ensure future access to care for patients with skin disease, growth in the use of NPCs has continued, with significant variation in use and supervision patterns. The US dermatology workforce, which is affected by a physician shortage, has reportedly seen a rapid and substantial influx of physician assistants (PAs) and nurse practitioners (NPs). Little is known about which dermatology practices use these practitioners, how they are supervised, and the services they are providing. We analyzed results of the American Academy of Dermatology's 2007 practice profile survey to learn more about patterns of nonphysician clinician (NPC) use. Of 3965 surveys mailed, responses were obtained from 1243 dermatologists (31% response rate). Comparison data were drawn from previous surveys conducted with a similar methodology in 2002 (35% response rate) and 2005 (30% response rate). Overall, 325 responding dermatologists (29.6%) reported using PAs, NPs, or both in their practices in 2007, a 43% increase from the proportion in 2002 (20.7%). PAs were more prevalent than NPs (23% vs 10%). By the year 2010, 36.2% of respondents plan to hire these NPCs. Younger cohorts of dermatologists were significantly more likely to use NPCs (P = .006), as were those in group and academic practices (P < .0001). Respondents seeking to hire additional dermatologists (P < .0001) and those with surgical or cosmetically focused practices (P < .001) were much more likely to use NPCs. Respondents reported supervising their NPCs on-site 92.8% of the time, but 31% were off-site 10% of the time or more. Most dermatologists allowed their NPCs to see new patients and established patients with new problems, and a minority of these patients were formally presented to a physician during extender visits. NPCs spent the majority of their time seeing medical dermatology patients, even if their supervising dermatologist was primarily engaged in surgical or cosmetic dermatology. Survey respondents might have inaccurately reported practice characteristics or might not be representative of all US dermatologists. In the setting of persistently long patient wait times and difficulty recruiting new physician staff, dermatologists have rapidly turned to PAs and NPs to help meet patient demand for care. These NPCs are primarily caring for new and established medical dermatology patients under indirect supervision. In the absence of explicit consensus or policy as to how the field should ensure future access to care for patients with skin disease, growth in the use of NPCs has continued, with significant variation in use and supervision patterns." @default.
• W2022191908 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2022191908 creator A5012588391 @default.
• W2022191908 creator A5059337854 @default.
• W2022191908 date "2008-02-01" @default.
• W2022191908 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2022191908 title "Who else is providing care in dermatology practices? Trends in the use of nonphysician clinicians" @default.
• W2022191908 cites W147463367 @default.
• W2022191908 cites W1999228529 @default.
• W2022191908 cites W2027827173 @default.
• W2022191908 cites W2061414922 @default.
• W2022191908 cites W2091929034 @default.
• W2022191908 cites W2092025101 @default.
• W2022191908 cites W2102435971 @default.
• W2022191908 cites W2113271175 @default.
• W2022191908 cites W2145676435 @default.
• W2022191908 cites W2147311150 @default.
• W2022191908 cites W2162317664 @default.
• W2022191908 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2007.09.032" @default.
• W2022191908 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18222319" @default.
• W2022191908 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2022191908 type Work @default.
• W2022191908 sameAs 2022191908 @default.
• W2022191908 citedByCount "75" @default.
• W2022191908 countsByYear W20221919082012 @default.
• W2022191908 countsByYear W20221919082013 @default.
• W2022191908 countsByYear W20221919082014 @default.
• W2022191908 countsByYear W20221919082015 @default.
• W2022191908 countsByYear W20221919082016 @default.
• W2022191908 countsByYear W20221919082017 @default.
• W2022191908 countsByYear W20221919082018 @default.
• W2022191908 countsByYear W20221919082019 @default.
• W2022191908 countsByYear W20221919082020 @default.
• W2022191908 countsByYear W20221919082021 @default.
• W2022191908 countsByYear W20221919082022 @default.
• W2022191908 countsByYear W20221919082023 @default.
• W2022191908 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2022191908 hasAuthorship W2022191908A5012588391 @default.
• W2022191908 hasAuthorship W2022191908A5059337854 @default.
• W2022191908 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2022191908 hasConcept C16005928 @default.
• W2022191908 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2022191908 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2022191908 hasConcept C194051981 @default.
• W2022191908 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W2022191908 hasConcept C2778139618 @default.
• W2022191908 hasConcept C3018572941 @default.
• W2022191908 hasConcept C3020008087 @default.
• W2022191908 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2022191908 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2022191908 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2022191908 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2022191908 hasConceptScore W2022191908C138885662 @default.
• W2022191908 hasConceptScore W2022191908C16005928 @default.
• W2022191908 hasConceptScore W2022191908C160735492 @default.
• W2022191908 hasConceptScore W2022191908C162324750 @default.
• W2022191908 hasConceptScore W2022191908C194051981 @default.
• W2022191908 hasConceptScore W2022191908C2778137410 @default.
• W2022191908 hasConceptScore W2022191908C2778139618 @default.
• W2022191908 hasConceptScore W2022191908C3018572941 @default.
• W2022191908 hasConceptScore W2022191908C3020008087 @default.
• W2022191908 hasConceptScore W2022191908C41895202 @default.
• W2022191908 hasConceptScore W2022191908C50522688 @default.
• W2022191908 hasConceptScore W2022191908C512399662 @default.
• W2022191908 hasConceptScore W2022191908C71924100 @default.
• W2022191908 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2022191908 hasLocation W20221919081 @default.
• W2022191908 hasLocation W20221919082 @default.
• W2022191908 hasOpenAccess W2022191908 @default.
• W2022191908 hasPrimaryLocation W20221919081 @default.
• W2022191908 hasRelatedWork W147463367 @default.
• W2022191908 hasRelatedWork W1985021735 @default.
• W2022191908 hasRelatedWork W2061414922 @default.
• W2022191908 hasRelatedWork W2096080463 @default.
• W2022191908 hasRelatedWork W2098918089 @default.
• W2022191908 hasRelatedWork W2413301012 @default.
• W2022191908 hasRelatedWork W2917277548 @default.
• W2022191908 hasRelatedWork W4207031999 @default.
• W2022191908 hasRelatedWork W4226228269 @default.
• W2022191908 hasRelatedWork W4385415228 @default.
• W2022191908 hasVolume "58" @default.
• W2022191908 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2022191908 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2022191908 magId "2022191908" @default.
• W2022191908 workType "article" @default.