FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2022205814> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2022205814 abstract "MacLean (2013) suggests an alternative approach to explain the effects of transmembrane AMPA receptor regulatory proteins (TARPs), namely that TARPs may promote closed-cleft ligand binding domain (LBD) conformations that are distinct from those frequented without TARPs. Evidence for multiple closed LBD conformations exists (Birdsey-Benson et al. 2010; Landes et al. 2011), and if they are correlated with structural differences elsewhere in the receptor this might lead to changes in multiple rate constants. Mechanistically, such a scenario could be represented with tiered reaction mechanisms similar to those employed to describe features of NMDA receptor gating (Zhang et al. 2008b; Vance et al. 2012).Both MacLean and I agree that kinetic models provide a useful focus for thinking about mechanisms. Although structural data are required to lend physical reality to the discrete states in such models, relating functional kinetic data to explicit mechanisms gives insight into the temporal sequence of conformational changes the receptor undergoes and the energy landscape through which it transits. Such an approach also avoids the danger of drawing mechanistic conclusions from measurements of operationally defined changes in population responses. For example, everyone agrees that TARPs slow the rate at which ensemble currents decay in response to a rapid application of near-saturating glutamate, which by definition represents a slowing of desensitization. However, the available evidence argues strongly against a significant effect of TARPs on δ, the rate at which receptors enter desensitized states (Fig. 1 in Howe (2013). If this rate primarily reflects the rate at which the dimer interface separates (Sun et al. 2002), then by extension TARPs do not primarily act by stabilizing this interface.The T686 mutants MacLean refers to, which disrupt a molecular latch that engages when the LBD closes, are an interesting case in point in this regard. The mutations both slow the rate at which ensemble currents decay during a sustained application of glutamate and increase the amplitude of the steady-state current as a fraction of the initial peak current (Robert et al. 2005). However, single-channel data show that both effects result directly from destabilization of the closed-cleft LBD (increases in CO; Fig. 1 in Howe (2013)), which prolongs latencies-to-first-opening and desynchronizes activation (Zhang et al. 2008a). Desynchronizing activation both slows the decay of ensemble currents and substantially reduces peak Popen (Colquhoun & Hawkes, 1995), and the larger relative sustained currents in the T686 mutants are not due to an increase in open probability late in the application but rather a reduction in the amplitude of peak currents." @default.
• W2022205814 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2022205814 creator A5052483047 @default.
• W2022205814 date "2013-03-27" @default.
• W2022205814 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2022205814 title "Rebuttal from James Howe" @default.
• W2022205814 cites W1505424611 @default.
• W2022205814 cites W196353518 @default.
• W2022205814 cites W1976903662 @default.
• W2022205814 cites W1978558648 @default.
• W2022205814 cites W2015352253 @default.
• W2022205814 cites W2081835411 @default.
• W2022205814 cites W2152738980 @default.
• W2022205814 cites W2153928331 @default.
• W2022205814 cites W2164476993 @default.
• W2022205814 cites W2165460659 @default.
• W2022205814 doi "https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2012.250449" @default.
• W2022205814 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3624835" @default.
• W2022205814 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2022205814 type Work @default.
• W2022205814 sameAs 2022205814 @default.
• W2022205814 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2022205814 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2022205814 hasAuthorship W2022205814A5052483047 @default.
• W2022205814 hasBestOaLocation W20222058142 @default.
• W2022205814 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2022205814 hasConcept C12554922 @default.
• W2022205814 hasConcept C160268369 @default.
• W2022205814 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2022205814 hasConcept C170493617 @default.
• W2022205814 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2022205814 hasConcept C194544171 @default.
• W2022205814 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2022205814 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2022205814 hasConcept C61174792 @default.
• W2022205814 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2022205814 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2022205814 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2022205814 hasConceptScore W2022205814C121332964 @default.
• W2022205814 hasConceptScore W2022205814C12554922 @default.
• W2022205814 hasConceptScore W2022205814C160268369 @default.
• W2022205814 hasConceptScore W2022205814C169760540 @default.
• W2022205814 hasConceptScore W2022205814C170493617 @default.
• W2022205814 hasConceptScore W2022205814C185592680 @default.
• W2022205814 hasConceptScore W2022205814C194544171 @default.
• W2022205814 hasConceptScore W2022205814C2908647359 @default.
• W2022205814 hasConceptScore W2022205814C55493867 @default.
• W2022205814 hasConceptScore W2022205814C61174792 @default.
• W2022205814 hasConceptScore W2022205814C71924100 @default.
• W2022205814 hasConceptScore W2022205814C86803240 @default.
• W2022205814 hasConceptScore W2022205814C99454951 @default.
• W2022205814 hasLocation W20222058141 @default.
• W2022205814 hasLocation W20222058142 @default.
• W2022205814 hasOpenAccess W2022205814 @default.
• W2022205814 hasPrimaryLocation W20222058141 @default.
• W2022205814 hasRelatedWork W2075307984 @default.
• W2022205814 hasRelatedWork W2592027451 @default.
• W2022205814 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2022205814 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2022205814 magId "2022205814" @default.
• W2022205814 workType "article" @default.