FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2022206013> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2022206013 endingPage "2000" @default.
• W2022206013 startingPage "1997" @default.
• W2022206013 abstract "No AccessJournal of UrologyAdult Urology1 Nov 2010Long-Term Results of Sacral Neuromodulation With the Tined Lead Procedure Tom A.T. Marcelissen, Randall K. Leong, Rob A. de Bie, Philip E.V. van Kerrebroeck, and Stefan G.G. de Wachter Tom A.T. MarcelissenTom A.T. Marcelissen Department of Urology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands More articles by this author , Randall K. LeongRandall K. Leong Department of Urology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands More articles by this author , Rob A. de BieRob A. de Bie Department of Epidemiology, Methodology and Statistics, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands More articles by this author , Philip E.V. van KerrebroeckPhilip E.V. van Kerrebroeck Department of Urology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands Financial interest and/or other relationship with Astellas and Ferring. More articles by this author , and Stefan G.G. de WachterStefan G.G. de Wachter Department of Urology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands Financial interest and/or other relationship with Medtronic. More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.142AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Purpose: We present long-term followup data on the outcome of sacral neuromodulation using the tined lead procedure. Materials and Methods: We conducted a single center study including all patients who received an implantable neurostimulator between 2002 and 2005 using the tined lead technique. Treatment efficacy was evaluated by comparing the data of a 3-day voiding diary filled out in May 2009 to the data before the onset of sacral neuromodulation treatment (baseline). Clinical success was defined as more than 50% improvement in at least 1 of the relevant voiding diary parameters. Results: A total of 64 patients underwent implantation with an implantable neurostimulator using the tined lead procedure. Mean followup was 53 months (range 35 to 77). Five patients died of causes unrelated to sacral neuromodulation and they were not included in analysis. The implantable neurostimulator was removed from 7 patients and 3 stopped using the neurostimulator. Voiding diary analysis showed that 38 of 59 patients (64%) were successfully treated. There were 21 patients (33%) who underwent a surgical revision due to an adverse event and 1 (1.6%) who underwent lead revision because of suspected lead migration. Conclusions: Sacral neuromodulation with the tined lead procedure is a safe and effective treatment for patients with overactive bladder symptoms or urinary retention. References 1 : Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and temporary S3 neuromodulation in idiopathic detrusor instability. J Urol1996; 155: 2005. Link, Google Scholar 2 : Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for urinary retention: results 18 months after implantation. J Urol2001; 165: 15. Link, Google Scholar 3 : Sacral neuromodulation in the treatment of urgency-frequency symptoms: a multicenter study on efficacy and safety. J Urol2000; 163: 1849. Link, Google Scholar 4 : Results of sacral neuromodulation therapy for urinary voiding dysfunction: outcomes of a prospective, worldwide clinical study. J Urol2007; 178: 2029. Link, Google Scholar 5 : Long-term results of a multicenter study on sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of urinary urge incontinence, urgency-frequency, and retention. Urology2000; 56: 87. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 6 : Sacral nerve neuromodulation in the treatment of patients with refractory motor urge incontinence: long-term results of a prospective longitudinal study. J Urol2000; 163: 1219. Link, Google Scholar 7 : New sacral neuromodulation lead for percutaneous implantation using local anesthesia: description and first experience. J Urol2003; 170: 1905. Link, Google Scholar 8 : New tined lead electrode in sacral neuromodulation: experience from a multicentre European study. World J Urol2005; 23: 225. Google Scholar 9 : Sacral nerve stimulation for voiding dysfunction: one institution's 11-year experience. Neurourol Urodyn2007; 26: 19. Google Scholar 10 : Complications and troubleshooting of sacral neuromodulation therapy. Urol Clin North Am2005; 32: 65. Google Scholar 11 : Long term results of neuromodulation by sacral nerve stimulation for lower urinary tract symptoms: a retrospective single center study. Eur Urol2006; 49: 366. Google Scholar 12 : Comparison of clinical outcome between open and percutaneous lead insertion for permanent sacral nerve neurostimulation for the treatment of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum2009; 52: 463. Google Scholar 13 : Failure of sacral nerve stimulation due to migration of tined lead. J Urol2006; 175: 2182. Link, Google Scholar 14 : Buttock placement of the implantable pulse generator: a new implantation technique for sacral neuromodulation–a multicenter study. Eur Urol2001; 40: 434. Google Scholar © 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byGill B, Pizarro-Berdichevsky J, Bhattacharyya P, Brink T, Marks B, Quirouet A, Vasavada S, Jones S and Goldman H (2017) Real-Time Changes in Brain Activity during Sacral Neuromodulation for Overactive BladderJournal of Urology, VOL. 198, NO. 6, (1379-1385), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2017.Smits M, Oerlemans D, Marcelissen T, Van Kerrebroeck P and De Wachter S (2013) Sacral Neuromodulation in Patients with Idiopathic Overactive Bladder after Initial Botulinum Toxin TherapyJournal of Urology, VOL. 190, NO. 6, (2148-2152), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2013.Clark C, Ngo T, Comiter C, Anderson R and Kennedy W (2011) Sacral Nerve Stimulator Revision Due to Somatic GrowthJournal of Urology, VOL. 186, NO. 4S, (1576-1580), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2011. Volume 184Issue 5November 2010Page: 1997-2000 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Keywordssurgical proceduresurinary bladderminimally invasiveelectric stimulation therapyMetricsAuthor Information Tom A.T. Marcelissen Department of Urology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands More articles by this author Randall K. Leong Department of Urology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands More articles by this author Rob A. de Bie Department of Epidemiology, Methodology and Statistics, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands More articles by this author Philip E.V. van Kerrebroeck Department of Urology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands Financial interest and/or other relationship with Astellas and Ferring. More articles by this author Stefan G.G. de Wachter Department of Urology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands Financial interest and/or other relationship with Medtronic. More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ..." @default.
• W2022206013 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2022206013 creator A5013294070 @default.
• W2022206013 creator A5019860414 @default.
• W2022206013 creator A5060345144 @default.
• W2022206013 creator A5066665869 @default.
• W2022206013 creator A5082877916 @default.
• W2022206013 date "2010-11-01" @default.
• W2022206013 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2022206013 title "Long-Term Results of Sacral Neuromodulation With the Tined Lead Procedure" @default.
• W2022206013 cites W1972448617 @default.
• W2022206013 cites W1991157079 @default.
• W2022206013 cites W2000655088 @default.
• W2022206013 cites W2020769178 @default.
• W2022206013 cites W2023606234 @default.
• W2022206013 cites W2038898824 @default.
• W2022206013 cites W2091918426 @default.
• W2022206013 cites W2093838229 @default.
• W2022206013 cites W2109446188 @default.
• W2022206013 cites W2129986023 @default.
• W2022206013 cites W2133227265 @default.
• W2022206013 cites W2152730379 @default.
• W2022206013 cites W2333453987 @default.
• W2022206013 cites W4302049038 @default.
• W2022206013 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.142" @default.
• W2022206013 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20850820" @default.
• W2022206013 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2022206013 type Work @default.
• W2022206013 sameAs 2022206013 @default.
• W2022206013 citedByCount "43" @default.
• W2022206013 countsByYear W20222060132012 @default.
• W2022206013 countsByYear W20222060132013 @default.
• W2022206013 countsByYear W20222060132014 @default.
• W2022206013 countsByYear W20222060132015 @default.
• W2022206013 countsByYear W20222060132016 @default.
• W2022206013 countsByYear W20222060132017 @default.
• W2022206013 countsByYear W20222060132018 @default.
• W2022206013 countsByYear W20222060132019 @default.
• W2022206013 countsByYear W20222060132020 @default.
• W2022206013 countsByYear W20222060132021 @default.
• W2022206013 countsByYear W20222060132022 @default.
• W2022206013 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2022206013 hasAuthorship W2022206013A5013294070 @default.
• W2022206013 hasAuthorship W2022206013A5019860414 @default.
• W2022206013 hasAuthorship W2022206013A5060345144 @default.
• W2022206013 hasAuthorship W2022206013A5066665869 @default.
• W2022206013 hasAuthorship W2022206013A5082877916 @default.
• W2022206013 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2022206013 hasConcept C3017551082 @default.
• W2022206013 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2022206013 hasConceptScore W2022206013C141071460 @default.
• W2022206013 hasConceptScore W2022206013C3017551082 @default.
• W2022206013 hasConceptScore W2022206013C71924100 @default.
• W2022206013 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2022206013 hasLocation W20222060131 @default.
• W2022206013 hasLocation W20222060132 @default.
• W2022206013 hasOpenAccess W2022206013 @default.
• W2022206013 hasPrimaryLocation W20222060131 @default.
• W2022206013 hasRelatedWork W1586374228 @default.
• W2022206013 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W2022206013 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W2022206013 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W2022206013 hasRelatedWork W2130554639 @default.
• W2022206013 hasRelatedWork W2364998975 @default.
• W2022206013 hasRelatedWork W2369162477 @default.
• W2022206013 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W2022206013 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
• W2022206013 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
• W2022206013 hasVolume "184" @default.
• W2022206013 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2022206013 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2022206013 magId "2022206013" @default.
• W2022206013 workType "article" @default.