FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2022206812> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2022206812 endingPage "540.e1" @default.
• W2022206812 startingPage "534" @default.
• W2022206812 abstract "Background & AimsColon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is an orally ingested colon imaging tool used to evaluate patients with colonic disease. We evaluated the efficacy of CCE in helping physicians make decisions about patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopies (ICCs).MethodsIn a prospective study, we analyzed data from 34 patients with nonocclusive ICC who were eligible for CCE between May 2010 and April 2011; patients with colectomy, occlusive lesions, or inadequate bowel cleansing for the colonoscopy were excluded. Two experienced observers who were blinded to colonoscopy findings analyzed the CCE data. Four months later, medical records were reviewed to determine the effects of CCE on medical decision making. CCE was considered conclusive when the findings facilitated a medical decision.ResultsBowel cleanliness was good or excellent for 22 patients (64.7%). CCE exceeded the most proximal point reached by conventional colonoscopy in 29 patients (85.3%). CCE findings allowed formulation of a specific medical plan for 20 patients (58.8%); 12 (35.2%) had irrelevant or no lesions, so the study was concluded; 7 (20.5%) underwent polypectomy or surgery for advanced colorectal neoplasia; and 1 (3%) was treated for Crohn's disease. Inconclusive CCEs resulted from poor preparation of the bowel (n = 12) and excessively slow (n = 1) or rapid (n = 1) capsule transit.ConclusionsCCE might be an alternative procedure to complete colon examination in patients with nonocclusive ICC. Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is an orally ingested colon imaging tool used to evaluate patients with colonic disease. We evaluated the efficacy of CCE in helping physicians make decisions about patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopies (ICCs). In a prospective study, we analyzed data from 34 patients with nonocclusive ICC who were eligible for CCE between May 2010 and April 2011; patients with colectomy, occlusive lesions, or inadequate bowel cleansing for the colonoscopy were excluded. Two experienced observers who were blinded to colonoscopy findings analyzed the CCE data. Four months later, medical records were reviewed to determine the effects of CCE on medical decision making. CCE was considered conclusive when the findings facilitated a medical decision. Bowel cleanliness was good or excellent for 22 patients (64.7%). CCE exceeded the most proximal point reached by conventional colonoscopy in 29 patients (85.3%). CCE findings allowed formulation of a specific medical plan for 20 patients (58.8%); 12 (35.2%) had irrelevant or no lesions, so the study was concluded; 7 (20.5%) underwent polypectomy or surgery for advanced colorectal neoplasia; and 1 (3%) was treated for Crohn's disease. Inconclusive CCEs resulted from poor preparation of the bowel (n = 12) and excessively slow (n = 1) or rapid (n = 1) capsule transit. CCE might be an alternative procedure to complete colon examination in patients with nonocclusive ICC." @default.
• W2022206812 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2022206812 creator A5039203636 @default.
• W2022206812 creator A5039208320 @default.
• W2022206812 creator A5039893343 @default.
• W2022206812 creator A5042508157 @default.
• W2022206812 creator A5066242649 @default.
• W2022206812 creator A5072570834 @default.
• W2022206812 creator A5075019092 @default.
• W2022206812 date "2013-05-01" @default.
• W2022206812 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2022206812 title "Effects of Colon Capsule Endoscopy on Medical Decision Making in Patients With Incomplete Colonoscopies" @default.
• W2022206812 cites W1530191069 @default.
• W2022206812 cites W1550005641 @default.
• W2022206812 cites W1967131828 @default.
• W2022206812 cites W1981497640 @default.
• W2022206812 cites W1998724395 @default.
• W2022206812 cites W2017342288 @default.
• W2022206812 cites W2019568687 @default.
• W2022206812 cites W2020043157 @default.
• W2022206812 cites W2031557337 @default.
• W2022206812 cites W2036470960 @default.
• W2022206812 cites W2042840450 @default.
• W2022206812 cites W2045121777 @default.
• W2022206812 cites W2049978855 @default.
• W2022206812 cites W2059811167 @default.
• W2022206812 cites W2063165596 @default.
• W2022206812 cites W2063803030 @default.
• W2022206812 cites W2066620097 @default.
• W2022206812 cites W2080840019 @default.
• W2022206812 cites W2085966454 @default.
• W2022206812 cites W2097429353 @default.
• W2022206812 cites W2130543432 @default.
• W2022206812 cites W2140144349 @default.
• W2022206812 cites W2150888295 @default.
• W2022206812 cites W2154240563 @default.
• W2022206812 cites W2154368944 @default.
• W2022206812 cites W2165188436 @default.
• W2022206812 cites W2165219252 @default.
• W2022206812 cites W2165926012 @default.
• W2022206812 cites W2315067951 @default.
• W2022206812 cites W2333024423 @default.
• W2022206812 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2012.10.016" @default.
• W2022206812 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23078891" @default.
• W2022206812 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2022206812 type Work @default.
• W2022206812 sameAs 2022206812 @default.
• W2022206812 citedByCount "53" @default.
• W2022206812 countsByYear W20222068122013 @default.
• W2022206812 countsByYear W20222068122014 @default.
• W2022206812 countsByYear W20222068122015 @default.
• W2022206812 countsByYear W20222068122016 @default.
• W2022206812 countsByYear W20222068122017 @default.
• W2022206812 countsByYear W20222068122018 @default.
• W2022206812 countsByYear W20222068122019 @default.
• W2022206812 countsByYear W20222068122020 @default.
• W2022206812 countsByYear W20222068122021 @default.
• W2022206812 countsByYear W20222068122022 @default.
• W2022206812 countsByYear W20222068122023 @default.
• W2022206812 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2022206812 hasAuthorship W2022206812A5039203636 @default.
• W2022206812 hasAuthorship W2022206812A5039208320 @default.
• W2022206812 hasAuthorship W2022206812A5039893343 @default.
• W2022206812 hasAuthorship W2022206812A5042508157 @default.
• W2022206812 hasAuthorship W2022206812A5066242649 @default.
• W2022206812 hasAuthorship W2022206812A5072570834 @default.
• W2022206812 hasAuthorship W2022206812A5075019092 @default.
• W2022206812 hasBestOaLocation W20222068121 @default.
• W2022206812 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2022206812 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2022206812 hasConcept C195910791 @default.
• W2022206812 hasConcept C2776667177 @default.
• W2022206812 hasConcept C2777333622 @default.
• W2022206812 hasConcept C2778435480 @default.
• W2022206812 hasConcept C2778451229 @default.
• W2022206812 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W2022206812 hasConcept C2780479503 @default.
• W2022206812 hasConcept C2780581329 @default.
• W2022206812 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W2022206812 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2022206812 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2022206812 hasConcept C90924648 @default.
• W2022206812 hasConceptScore W2022206812C121608353 @default.
• W2022206812 hasConceptScore W2022206812C126322002 @default.
• W2022206812 hasConceptScore W2022206812C195910791 @default.
• W2022206812 hasConceptScore W2022206812C2776667177 @default.
• W2022206812 hasConceptScore W2022206812C2777333622 @default.
• W2022206812 hasConceptScore W2022206812C2778435480 @default.
• W2022206812 hasConceptScore W2022206812C2778451229 @default.
• W2022206812 hasConceptScore W2022206812C2779134260 @default.
• W2022206812 hasConceptScore W2022206812C2780479503 @default.
• W2022206812 hasConceptScore W2022206812C2780581329 @default.
• W2022206812 hasConceptScore W2022206812C526805850 @default.
• W2022206812 hasConceptScore W2022206812C61434518 @default.
• W2022206812 hasConceptScore W2022206812C71924100 @default.
• W2022206812 hasConceptScore W2022206812C90924648 @default.
• W2022206812 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2022206812 hasLocation W20222068121 @default.

• next