FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2022238570> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2022238570 endingPage "1106" @default.
• W2022238570 startingPage "1105" @default.
• W2022238570 abstract "Context and setting Medical residents must learn techniques to manage and appraise the ever-expanding medical literature in order to incorporate relevant evidence into patient care. Using evidence-based medicine (EBM) is an accepted method of teaching and practising incorporating medical literature into clinical care. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has included EBM as a core component of the practice-based learning and improvement competency. Why the idea was necessary Quality tools with which to evaluate EBM competency are lacking. Many evaluate only individual components of the EBM process, and few evaluate performance during actual patient care. We evaluated the feasibility and reliability of an EBM educational prescription (EP) to enhance skills and evaluate competence. What was done Based on a literature review and input from experts, we developed an EP to guide residents step-by step through the EBM process. We also developed an EP rating form to be used by teaching staff to evaluate resident performance. Eight internal medicine teaching staff were given a 2-hour, hands-on EBM training session and 2 hours of simulated teaching and rating activities using the EP. Over the next 4 months, EPs were assigned to residents on 2–4-week in-patient rotations. Using the EP, residents answered a clinical question and presented their results to the ward team. Teaching staff used the EP rating form to evaluate resident competence in clinical question formation, searching for evidence, evaluating the evidence and applying the evidence to the patient. Residents were also rated on overall competence and ability to teach the team. Ratings, based on a scoring rubric, included not yet competent, competent or superior in each area. End-of-rotation questionnaires assessed teaching staff and resident EP use and perceptions. Qualitative evaluation was obtained via semi-structured interviews with faculty members and resident focus groups. Two authors independently graded 20 EPs to evaluate scoring reliability (Cohen’s kappa). Evaluation of results and impact Teaching staff used the EP with 20 residents on general internal medicine ward, subspecialty consult or subspecialty ward rotations. Residents reported completing an average of 1.4 EPs per rotation (standard deviation [SD] 1.2). Teaching staff felt adequately prepared to use the EP (mean 4.1, SD 1.1 [on a 5-point Likert scale]) and planned to continue using it for teaching (mean 4.0, SD 0.5). They reported inadequate time to have learners perform EPs, however (mean 2.1, SD 1.3). Inter-rater reliability on the 20 EPs showed substantial agreement for Searching (κ = 0.70) and Application of Evidence (κ = 0.72); moderate agreement for Overall Competence (κ = 0.57) and Evaluation of Evidence (κ = 0.44); and fair agreement for Question Formation (κ = 0.22). Residents reported that using the EP improved their EBM skills and allowed them to apply previous EBM teaching. Both teaching staff and residents reported lack of time as a barrier to performing EPs in the inpatient setting and recommended online versions of the forms. The EP is feasible to use during inpatient rotations with modest faculty training. Inter-rater reliability was generally good, but requires further assessment. The EP can be a useful method for determining residents’ EBM competence." @default.
• W2022238570 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2022238570 creator A5020456676 @default.
• W2022238570 creator A5052256003 @default.
• W2022238570 creator A5087760391 @default.
• W2022238570 date "2009-11-01" @default.
• W2022238570 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2022238570 title "Feasibility of an evidence-based medicine educational prescription" @default.
• W2022238570 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03492.x" @default.
• W2022238570 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/2827765" @default.
• W2022238570 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19874516" @default.
• W2022238570 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2022238570 type Work @default.
• W2022238570 sameAs 2022238570 @default.
• W2022238570 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W2022238570 countsByYear W20222385702013 @default.
• W2022238570 countsByYear W20222385702016 @default.
• W2022238570 countsByYear W20222385702019 @default.
• W2022238570 countsByYear W20222385702020 @default.
• W2022238570 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2022238570 hasAuthorship W2022238570A5020456676 @default.
• W2022238570 hasAuthorship W2022238570A5052256003 @default.
• W2022238570 hasAuthorship W2022238570A5087760391 @default.
• W2022238570 hasBestOaLocation W20222385701 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConcept C100521375 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConcept C164065428 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConcept C19648533 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConcept C2426938 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConcept C2779767262 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConcept C61521584 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConceptScore W2022238570C100521375 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConceptScore W2022238570C142724271 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConceptScore W2022238570C144133560 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConceptScore W2022238570C151730666 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConceptScore W2022238570C15744967 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConceptScore W2022238570C159110408 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConceptScore W2022238570C162853370 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConceptScore W2022238570C164065428 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConceptScore W2022238570C17744445 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConceptScore W2022238570C19648533 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConceptScore W2022238570C199539241 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConceptScore W2022238570C204787440 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConceptScore W2022238570C2426938 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConceptScore W2022238570C2779343474 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConceptScore W2022238570C2779473830 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConceptScore W2022238570C2779767262 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConceptScore W2022238570C509550671 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConceptScore W2022238570C512399662 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConceptScore W2022238570C61521584 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConceptScore W2022238570C71924100 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConceptScore W2022238570C77805123 @default.
• W2022238570 hasConceptScore W2022238570C86803240 @default.
• W2022238570 hasIssue "11" @default.
• W2022238570 hasLocation W20222385701 @default.
• W2022238570 hasLocation W20222385702 @default.
• W2022238570 hasLocation W20222385703 @default.
• W2022238570 hasLocation W20222385704 @default.
• W2022238570 hasOpenAccess W2022238570 @default.
• W2022238570 hasPrimaryLocation W20222385701 @default.
• W2022238570 hasRelatedWork W1510526097 @default.
• W2022238570 hasRelatedWork W1964864726 @default.
• W2022238570 hasRelatedWork W2061932680 @default.
• W2022238570 hasRelatedWork W2063433155 @default.
• W2022238570 hasRelatedWork W2158101438 @default.
• W2022238570 hasRelatedWork W2172289563 @default.
• W2022238570 hasRelatedWork W2175364946 @default.
• W2022238570 hasRelatedWork W2313462721 @default.
• W2022238570 hasRelatedWork W2519250953 @default.
• W2022238570 hasRelatedWork W4233832776 @default.
• W2022238570 hasVolume "43" @default.
• W2022238570 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2022238570 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2022238570 magId "2022238570" @default.
• W2022238570 workType "article" @default.