FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2022263199> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2022263199 endingPage "A162" @default.
• W2022263199 startingPage "A162" @default.
• W2022263199 abstract "<h3>Introduction</h3> Anecdotal clinical evidence supports the use of carbonated liquids for reducing pharyngeal transit time and the likelihood of aspiration in dysphagic patients compared to non-carbonated liquids.1 However, there is limited literature on the effects of carbonation on the physiology of swallowing behaviour. The aim of this study was thus to examine the effects of carbonated compared to non-carbonated solutions on swallowing behaviour, assessed by a novel reaction time task,2 in healthy participants. <h3>Methods</h3> Data was collected from 20 adult volunteers (mean age 25.7 years, 12 male). Volunteers swallowed an intrapharyngeal catheter with built-in pressure transducers to measure pharyngeal pressures. Subjects were asked to swallow either carbonated (condition A) or still (condition B) water, while performing 10 normal swallows (normally paced swallows), 10 fast swallows (swallowing as fast as possible) and 10 challenged swallows (swallowing within a limited time window). The conditions were performed twice and allocated in a pseudo-randomised manner. The trigger to swallow was an electrical pulse to the hand. A locally programmed laboratory interface system was used to record swallowing reaction times. Data were analysed with non-parametric Wilcoxon9s test in SPSS 14. <h3>Results</h3> <i>Normal swallows:</i> Despite a greater spread and wider IQR for carbonated water ((ms): still =875, carbonated =873), there was no difference between mean swallowing times between conditions ((ms): still = 1995, carbonated =2027, p= 0.50). <i>Fast swallows:</i> As with normal swallows, the IQR was larger with carbonated compared to still water ((ms): still=463, carbonated=588), however there remained no difference between the two conditions (means (ms): still =886, carbonated=879, p=0.74). <i>Challenged swallows:</i> By contrast to automated swallowing, carbonated water improved the number of correctly timed challenged swallows by ∼29% compared to still (mean (% correct) ±SD: still=31, carbonated=40, p=0.02). Across all swallowing tasks, there were no gender specific effects of carbonation. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Carbonation appears to alter swallowing behaviour by favouring improvements in complex tasks over automated tasks. This has implications for the use of carbonation as a treatment option for dysphagic patients in preventing aspiration. These findings provide support for carbonation being a useful means of altering swallowing performance, potentially in those at risk of aspiration and lay the foundation for further studies accounting for pH, temperature and taste on swallowing function." @default.
• W2022263199 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2022263199 creator A5005672931 @default.
• W2022263199 creator A5023278087 @default.
• W2022263199 creator A5035016276 @default.
• W2022263199 creator A5035661638 @default.
• W2022263199 creator A5072129575 @default.
• W2022263199 date "2011-03-13" @default.
• W2022263199 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2022263199 title "Evidence for an enhancing effect of carbonated liquids on complex human swallowing behaviour" @default.
• W2022263199 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2011.239301.343" @default.
• W2022263199 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2022263199 type Work @default.
• W2022263199 sameAs 2022263199 @default.
• W2022263199 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2022263199 countsByYear W20222631992015 @default.
• W2022263199 countsByYear W20222631992016 @default.
• W2022263199 countsByYear W20222631992019 @default.
• W2022263199 countsByYear W20222631992021 @default.
• W2022263199 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2022263199 hasAuthorship W2022263199A5005672931 @default.
• W2022263199 hasAuthorship W2022263199A5023278087 @default.
• W2022263199 hasAuthorship W2022263199A5035016276 @default.
• W2022263199 hasAuthorship W2022263199A5035661638 @default.
• W2022263199 hasAuthorship W2022263199A5072129575 @default.
• W2022263199 hasBestOaLocation W20222631991 @default.
• W2022263199 hasConcept C112497637 @default.
• W2022263199 hasConcept C120809312 @default.
• W2022263199 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2022263199 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
• W2022263199 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2022263199 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2022263199 hasConcept C2780596822 @default.
• W2022263199 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2022263199 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2022263199 hasConceptScore W2022263199C112497637 @default.
• W2022263199 hasConceptScore W2022263199C120809312 @default.
• W2022263199 hasConceptScore W2022263199C141071460 @default.
• W2022263199 hasConceptScore W2022263199C178790620 @default.
• W2022263199 hasConceptScore W2022263199C185592680 @default.
• W2022263199 hasConceptScore W2022263199C199343813 @default.
• W2022263199 hasConceptScore W2022263199C2780596822 @default.
• W2022263199 hasConceptScore W2022263199C42219234 @default.
• W2022263199 hasConceptScore W2022263199C71924100 @default.
• W2022263199 hasIssue "Suppl 1" @default.
• W2022263199 hasLocation W20222631991 @default.
• W2022263199 hasOpenAccess W2022263199 @default.
• W2022263199 hasPrimaryLocation W20222631991 @default.
• W2022263199 hasRelatedWork W1982584050 @default.
• W2022263199 hasRelatedWork W2092096502 @default.
• W2022263199 hasRelatedWork W2108436789 @default.
• W2022263199 hasRelatedWork W2165457348 @default.
• W2022263199 hasRelatedWork W2383412682 @default.
• W2022263199 hasRelatedWork W2468128494 @default.
• W2022263199 hasRelatedWork W2479206441 @default.
• W2022263199 hasRelatedWork W2989091870 @default.
• W2022263199 hasRelatedWork W4309077164 @default.
• W2022263199 hasRelatedWork W8853165 @default.
• W2022263199 hasVolume "60" @default.
• W2022263199 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2022263199 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2022263199 magId "2022263199" @default.
• W2022263199 workType "article" @default.