FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2022270812> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2022270812 endingPage "245" @default.
• W2022270812 startingPage "241" @default.
• W2022270812 abstract "Dans un objectif d’évaluation et d’amélioration des pratiques professionnelles, l’informatique semble l’outil le plus adapté. Un des principaux domaines pouvant en bénéficier serait la gestion de l’antibioprophylaxie chirurgicale. Malgré les recommandations émanant des sociétés savantes et l’intérêt démontré de leur application rigoureuse, des dysfonctionnements persistent. Disposant déjà d’un système informatique dans notre service, nous nous sommes intéressés à l’évaluation de nos pratiques et à l’impact de cet outil dans l’application de l’antibioprophylaxie. Audits cliniques avant et après mesures. Trois audits de pratique ont été réalisés : avant la mise en place du protocole service et de l’aide informatique (2322 inclus), immédiatement après la mesure (2678 inclus) et enfin à distance (2863 inclus). L’outil informatique a permis une amélioration des pratiques et de l’adéquation aux protocoles dans notre établissement (55 à 81 %, p < 0,01). Toutefois, au cours du temps, un relâchement est observé avec une réaugmentation du nombre d’oublis d’antibioprophylaxie. L’informatique se place comme un outil d’aide à la décision, de rationalisation et d’évaluation des pratiques professionnelles, mais elle doit être accompagnée de mesures éducatives régulières pour faire vivre les protocoles et bases de données. Information technologies appear to be interesting tools to assess and improve professional practices. In that setting, the management of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis represents an appropriate clinical area for using and evaluating such a tool. Despite the existence of guidelines in one hand and the demonstrated interest for a strict application of recommendations in the other hand, some irregularities in the management of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis remain in France in 2010. Since we have had computer systems in our department for several years, we performed an evaluation of practice to assess the impact of both the computer-based help and the updating of knowledge in physicians as tools to improve the application of guidelines for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. Clinical audits. Three clinical audits have therefore been performed before an implementation of computer-based help for clinical decisions and a clinical update for physicians, immediately after, and two years after this combined procedure (2322, 2678 and 2863 patients, respectively). There was an enhancement of clinical practices and compliance to guidelines secondary to the beginning of computer-based prescription (55 to 81%, P < 0.05). However, a weaning effect was observed with longer intervals between clinical update and surgical procedure, in association with increased omissions of antibiotic prophylaxis. Computer-based help for clinical decision and prescription seems to be a useful tool for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis but it should be accompanied by direct regular educational measures to update protocols and databases." @default.
• W2022270812 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2022270812 creator A5014519093 @default.
• W2022270812 creator A5044774387 @default.
• W2022270812 creator A5045185554 @default.
• W2022270812 creator A5052006646 @default.
• W2022270812 creator A5057024158 @default.
• W2022270812 creator A5071874371 @default.
• W2022270812 date "2013-04-01" @default.
• W2022270812 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W2022270812 title "Apport de l’outil informatique dans l’application de protocoles : exemple de l’antibioprophylaxie chirurgicale" @default.
• W2022270812 cites W1972279326 @default.
• W2022270812 cites W1978567093 @default.
• W2022270812 cites W1987599774 @default.
• W2022270812 cites W1997040994 @default.
• W2022270812 cites W2031834516 @default.
• W2022270812 cites W2058104808 @default.
• W2022270812 cites W2066333222 @default.
• W2022270812 cites W2069543404 @default.
• W2022270812 cites W2069969451 @default.
• W2022270812 cites W2091269080 @default.
• W2022270812 cites W2104026855 @default.
• W2022270812 cites W2110420504 @default.
• W2022270812 cites W2136264102 @default.
• W2022270812 cites W2142718860 @default.
• W2022270812 cites W2157814042 @default.
• W2022270812 cites W2319207304 @default.
• W2022270812 cites W4211113379 @default.
• W2022270812 cites W4229877405 @default.
• W2022270812 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annfar.2013.01.026" @default.
• W2022270812 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23523161" @default.
• W2022270812 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2022270812 type Work @default.
• W2022270812 sameAs 2022270812 @default.
• W2022270812 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2022270812 countsByYear W20222708122022 @default.
• W2022270812 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2022270812 hasAuthorship W2022270812A5014519093 @default.
• W2022270812 hasAuthorship W2022270812A5044774387 @default.
• W2022270812 hasAuthorship W2022270812A5045185554 @default.
• W2022270812 hasAuthorship W2022270812A5052006646 @default.
• W2022270812 hasAuthorship W2022270812A5057024158 @default.
• W2022270812 hasAuthorship W2022270812A5071874371 @default.
• W2022270812 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W2022270812 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2022270812 hasConceptScore W2022270812C29456083 @default.
• W2022270812 hasConceptScore W2022270812C71924100 @default.
• W2022270812 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2022270812 hasLocation W20222708121 @default.
• W2022270812 hasLocation W20222708122 @default.
• W2022270812 hasOpenAccess W2022270812 @default.
• W2022270812 hasPrimaryLocation W20222708121 @default.
• W2022270812 hasRelatedWork W1506200166 @default.
• W2022270812 hasRelatedWork W2039318446 @default.
• W2022270812 hasRelatedWork W2048182022 @default.
• W2022270812 hasRelatedWork W2080531066 @default.
• W2022270812 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2022270812 hasRelatedWork W2789448498 @default.
• W2022270812 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2022270812 hasRelatedWork W2998699411 @default.
• W2022270812 hasRelatedWork W3032375762 @default.
• W2022270812 hasRelatedWork W3108674512 @default.
• W2022270812 hasVolume "32" @default.
• W2022270812 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2022270812 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2022270812 magId "2022270812" @default.
• W2022270812 workType "article" @default.