Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2022308823> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2022308823 endingPage "175" @default.
- W2022308823 startingPage "171" @default.
- W2022308823 abstract "High breast density on mammography is associated with a four to six-fold increased risk of breast cancer [ 1 Byrne C. Schairer C. Wolfe J. et al. Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause statusm. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1995; 87: 1622-1629 Crossref PubMed Scopus (740) Google Scholar , 2 Byng J.W. Yaffe M.J. Jong R.A. et al. Analysis of mammographic density and breast cancer risk from digitized mammograms. Radiographics. 1998; 18: 1587-1598 Crossref PubMed Scopus (206) Google Scholar ]. A review of eight cohort studies concluded that women with the highest breast density using Wolfe's method of classification compared with the lowest density have a relative risk of 5.2 (CI=3.6–7.5) for breast cancer [ [3] Warner E. Lockwood G. Tritchler D. Boyd N.F. The risk of breast cancer associated with mammographic parenchymal patterns: a meta-analysis of the published literature to examine the effect of method of classification. Cancer Detect. Prev. 1992; 16: 67-72 PubMed Google Scholar ]. Increased density is also a problem because it impairs the detection of breast masses (microcalcifications are less obscured by surrounding dense tissue than masses) [ [4] Freedman M. San Martin J. O'Gorman J. et al. Digitized mammography: a clinical trial of postmenopausal women randomly assigned to receive raloxifene, estrogen, or placebo. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2001; 93: 51-56 Crossref PubMed Scopus (131) Google Scholar ]. A failure to detect masses because of high density would cause an increase in interval cancers (cancers that present between mammographic screenings). Difficulties in reading high density mammograms also produce false positive recalls (patients who are recalled for assessment and found not to have cancer). Being recalled for reassessment after an initial mammogram is a cause of significant psychological stress [ [5] Ong G. Austoker J. Brett J. Breast screening: adverse psychological consequences 1 month after placing women on early recall because of a diagnostic uncertainty. A multicentre study. J. Med. Screen. 1997; 4: 158-168 PubMed Google Scholar ]. In addition, at least 25% of the overall cost of mammographic screening in one US program was attributed to investigations of false positive readings [ [6] Elmore J.G. Barton M.B. Moceri V.M. et al. Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. New Engl. J. Med. 1998; 338: 1089-1096 Crossref PubMed Scopus (906) Google Scholar ]." @default.
- W2022308823 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2022308823 creator A5028401969 @default.
- W2022308823 date "2002-03-01" @default.
- W2022308823 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W2022308823 title "The meaning of mammographic breast density in users of postmenopausal hormone therapy" @default.
- W2022308823 cites W1590311791 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W1764056236 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W1843666312 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W1885709847 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W1970169800 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W1970215988 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W1972393754 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W1973321155 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W1973689873 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W1987184026 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W1995244346 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W1997869010 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W2004693593 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W2012822424 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W2023996525 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W2027037475 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W2027077515 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W2033345348 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W2034185072 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W2048511407 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W2057247490 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W2057703737 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W2072317182 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W2083816470 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W2088153095 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W2100924037 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W2102505125 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W2109525388 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W2110295371 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W2113899117 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W2121350574 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W2141450021 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W2144701098 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W2154549606 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W2170309362 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W2289353246 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W2323923429 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W2325332048 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W2330411228 @default.
- W2022308823 cites W4232115780 @default.
- W2022308823 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-5122(02)00006-3" @default.
- W2022308823 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11886762" @default.
- W2022308823 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
- W2022308823 type Work @default.
- W2022308823 sameAs 2022308823 @default.
- W2022308823 citedByCount "28" @default.
- W2022308823 countsByYear W20223088232013 @default.
- W2022308823 countsByYear W20223088232014 @default.
- W2022308823 countsByYear W20223088232018 @default.
- W2022308823 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2022308823 hasAuthorship W2022308823A5028401969 @default.
- W2022308823 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
- W2022308823 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2022308823 hasConcept C143998085 @default.
- W2022308823 hasConcept C2777176818 @default.
- W2022308823 hasConcept C2777432617 @default.
- W2022308823 hasConcept C2779377019 @default.
- W2022308823 hasConcept C2779889926 @default.
- W2022308823 hasConcept C2780472235 @default.
- W2022308823 hasConcept C2909213482 @default.
- W2022308823 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
- W2022308823 hasConcept C3018951153 @default.
- W2022308823 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
- W2022308823 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2022308823 hasConceptScore W2022308823C121608353 @default.
- W2022308823 hasConceptScore W2022308823C126322002 @default.
- W2022308823 hasConceptScore W2022308823C143998085 @default.
- W2022308823 hasConceptScore W2022308823C2777176818 @default.
- W2022308823 hasConceptScore W2022308823C2777432617 @default.
- W2022308823 hasConceptScore W2022308823C2779377019 @default.
- W2022308823 hasConceptScore W2022308823C2779889926 @default.
- W2022308823 hasConceptScore W2022308823C2780472235 @default.
- W2022308823 hasConceptScore W2022308823C2909213482 @default.
- W2022308823 hasConceptScore W2022308823C29456083 @default.
- W2022308823 hasConceptScore W2022308823C3018951153 @default.
- W2022308823 hasConceptScore W2022308823C530470458 @default.
- W2022308823 hasConceptScore W2022308823C71924100 @default.
- W2022308823 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2022308823 hasLocation W20223088231 @default.
- W2022308823 hasLocation W20223088232 @default.
- W2022308823 hasOpenAccess W2022308823 @default.
- W2022308823 hasPrimaryLocation W20223088231 @default.
- W2022308823 hasRelatedWork W1955623567 @default.
- W2022308823 hasRelatedWork W2022308823 @default.
- W2022308823 hasRelatedWork W2060940561 @default.
- W2022308823 hasRelatedWork W2138710637 @default.
- W2022308823 hasRelatedWork W2185659136 @default.
- W2022308823 hasRelatedWork W2265000734 @default.
- W2022308823 hasRelatedWork W2585381429 @default.
- W2022308823 hasRelatedWork W2715581621 @default.
- W2022308823 hasRelatedWork W4220946250 @default.
- W2022308823 hasRelatedWork W4320729738 @default.