Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2022341432> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2022341432 endingPage "328" @default.
- W2022341432 startingPage "315" @default.
- W2022341432 abstract "Purpose: There is widespread acceptance that patients demonstrating neglect/hemi-inattention (HI) following right hemisphere stroke (RHS) underachieve functionally compared to their counterparts without neglect. However, empirical evidence for this view needs examination. The purpose of this review is to critically appraise relevant studies that compared outcomes from RHS patients with/without hemi-attention and suggest more robust follow-up research. Method: Twelve studies published in 1995–2013 were critically reviewed. Two independent reviewers appraised design features including sample representation, assessment and data analysis methods. Strengths and limitations were highlighted. Results: Results were largely inconsistent. Considerable heterogeneity within patient groups and across studies complicated interpretation. Evidence suggested average group disparity in scores between patients with and without HI at discharge but the cause of functional disparity could not be attributed specifically to HI from the data and modelling results available. Conclusion: The relationship between HI status and functional recovery warrants further investigation in studies with stronger methodology to ensure rigour and robustness in the results. Pending further research, HI status should not be regarded as a key predictor of functional recovery or rehabilitation potential in patients with RHSs. This group should continue to receive appropriate therapeutic intervention aimed at maximising their functional recovery post-stroke.Implications for RehabilitationFindings from this review demonstrate a paucity of evidence to support the presence of hemi-inattention as a key predictor of functional recovery in patients with right hemisphere stroke; as such, practitioners should take this into consideration when planning rehabilitation programmes of their patients.In the initial months following right hemisphere stroke, there are wide-ranging differences in the rate and amount of functional recovery in patients, with and without hemi-inattention. Practitioners should not limit the aspirations of their patients based on the presence or absence of hemi-inattention.This review has identified a number of measurement limitations in commonly employed assessment tools for hemi-inattention and overall functional recovery. As such, practitioners should take the limitations of specific measures into account when interpreting the results contextually and with respect to their patients’ situation." @default.
- W2022341432 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2022341432 creator A5012475830 @default.
- W2022341432 creator A5070207884 @default.
- W2022341432 creator A5086736969 @default.
- W2022341432 date "2015-04-20" @default.
- W2022341432 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W2022341432 title "What are the functional outcomes of right hemisphere stroke patients with or without hemi-inattention complications? A critical narrative review and suggestions for further research" @default.
- W2022341432 cites W1534964070 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W1598153360 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W1915483530 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W1964770394 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W1965713781 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W1972017586 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W1973622168 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W1974187121 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W1975450584 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W1997930833 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W1999410508 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2001166232 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2011408110 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2017104015 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2017912505 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2022224962 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2027435198 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2032397543 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2034065282 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2035797555 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2037485650 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2042080283 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2046844694 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2050224711 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2051280853 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2053634798 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2057660102 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2063369971 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2069369839 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2070116364 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2071513404 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2077203732 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2086992684 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2102981294 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2107486370 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2127223088 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2127339164 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2133231368 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2133576576 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2136404265 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2144642355 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2147161853 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2149344544 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2156204015 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2157771895 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2158671094 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2159053241 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2160212124 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2165010366 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2168122788 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2172216441 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2207584963 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2414795604 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2416796163 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W2768689142 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W3121452939 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W4231325795 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W4245877574 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W4256245006 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W4291256027 @default.
- W2022341432 cites W65405978 @default.
- W2022341432 doi "https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2015.1037865" @default.
- W2022341432 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4720036" @default.
- W2022341432 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25893401" @default.
- W2022341432 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
- W2022341432 type Work @default.
- W2022341432 sameAs 2022341432 @default.
- W2022341432 citedByCount "17" @default.
- W2022341432 countsByYear W20223414322017 @default.
- W2022341432 countsByYear W20223414322018 @default.
- W2022341432 countsByYear W20223414322019 @default.
- W2022341432 countsByYear W20223414322020 @default.
- W2022341432 countsByYear W20223414322021 @default.
- W2022341432 countsByYear W20223414322022 @default.
- W2022341432 countsByYear W20223414322023 @default.
- W2022341432 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2022341432 hasAuthorship W2022341432A5012475830 @default.
- W2022341432 hasAuthorship W2022341432A5070207884 @default.
- W2022341432 hasAuthorship W2022341432A5086736969 @default.
- W2022341432 hasBestOaLocation W20223414321 @default.
- W2022341432 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
- W2022341432 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W2022341432 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2022341432 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
- W2022341432 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
- W2022341432 hasConcept C2776289891 @default.
- W2022341432 hasConcept C2776361831 @default.
- W2022341432 hasConcept C2778818304 @default.
- W2022341432 hasConcept C2780645631 @default.
- W2022341432 hasConcept C2780665704 @default.