FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2022359623> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2022359623 endingPage "2119.e3" @default.
• W2022359623 startingPage "2112" @default.
• W2022359623 abstract "Purpose To examine the grading (interrater) reliability of the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) Clinical Lens Grading System (ARLNS). Design Evaluation of diagnostic test or technology. Participants One hundred fifty volunteers (284 eyes). Methods Participants with lens opacities of varying severity were independently graded at the slit lamp for cataract severity by 2 examiners (retinal or anterior segment specialists) using the ARLNS, which employs 3 standard photographs of increasing severity for classifying each of the 3 major types of opacity. Lens photographs were taken and graded at a reading center using the more detailed AREDS System for Classifying Cataracts from photographs. Main Outcome Measures The Pearson correlation, weighted-kappa, and limits-of-agreement statistics were used to assess the interrater agreement of the gradings. Results Examinations were performed on 284 lenses (150 participants). Tests of interrater reliability between pairs of clinicians showed substantial agreement between clinicians for cortical and posterior subcapsular opacities and moderate agreement for nuclear opacities. A similar pattern and strength of agreement was present when comparing scores of retinal versus anterior segment specialists. Interrater agreement between clinical and reading center gradings was not as great as inter-clinician agreement. Conclusions Interrater agreements were in the moderate to substantial range for the clinical assessment of lens opacities. Inherent differences in cataract classification systems that rely on slit lamp vs photographic assessments of lens opacities may explain some of the disagreement noted between slit lamp and photographic gradings. Given the interrater reliability statistics for clinicians and the simplicity of the grading procedure, ARLNS is presented for use in studies requiring a simple, inexpensive method for detecting the presence and severity of the major types of lens opacities. Financial Disclosure(s) The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any of the materials discussed in this article. To examine the grading (interrater) reliability of the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) Clinical Lens Grading System (ARLNS). Evaluation of diagnostic test or technology. One hundred fifty volunteers (284 eyes). Participants with lens opacities of varying severity were independently graded at the slit lamp for cataract severity by 2 examiners (retinal or anterior segment specialists) using the ARLNS, which employs 3 standard photographs of increasing severity for classifying each of the 3 major types of opacity. Lens photographs were taken and graded at a reading center using the more detailed AREDS System for Classifying Cataracts from photographs. The Pearson correlation, weighted-kappa, and limits-of-agreement statistics were used to assess the interrater agreement of the gradings. Examinations were performed on 284 lenses (150 participants). Tests of interrater reliability between pairs of clinicians showed substantial agreement between clinicians for cortical and posterior subcapsular opacities and moderate agreement for nuclear opacities. A similar pattern and strength of agreement was present when comparing scores of retinal versus anterior segment specialists. Interrater agreement between clinical and reading center gradings was not as great as inter-clinician agreement. Interrater agreements were in the moderate to substantial range for the clinical assessment of lens opacities. Inherent differences in cataract classification systems that rely on slit lamp vs photographic assessments of lens opacities may explain some of the disagreement noted between slit lamp and photographic gradings. Given the interrater reliability statistics for clinicians and the simplicity of the grading procedure, ARLNS is presented for use in studies requiring a simple, inexpensive method for detecting the presence and severity of the major types of lens opacities." @default.
• W2022359623 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2022359623 creator A5006255873 @default.
• W2022359623 creator A5009887285 @default.
• W2022359623 creator A5033904790 @default.
• W2022359623 creator A5039958951 @default.
• W2022359623 creator A5053386702 @default.
• W2022359623 creator A5056249618 @default.
• W2022359623 creator A5063489579 @default.
• W2022359623 creator A5068302775 @default.
• W2022359623 creator A5071253903 @default.
• W2022359623 creator A5088078791 @default.
• W2022359623 creator A5090802305 @default.
• W2022359623 date "2010-11-01" @default.
• W2022359623 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2022359623 title "Evaluation of the Age-Related Eye Disease Study Clinical Lens Grading System" @default.
• W2022359623 cites W2010317716 @default.
• W2022359623 cites W2015795623 @default.
• W2022359623 cites W2024201314 @default.
• W2022359623 cites W2037789405 @default.
• W2022359623 cites W2038835377 @default.
• W2022359623 cites W2047209146 @default.
• W2022359623 cites W2053154970 @default.
• W2022359623 cites W2054992874 @default.
• W2022359623 cites W2059033740 @default.
• W2022359623 cites W2089945049 @default.
• W2022359623 cites W2099838434 @default.
• W2022359623 cites W2115019279 @default.
• W2022359623 cites W2133012565 @default.
• W2022359623 cites W2164777277 @default.
• W2022359623 cites W2561069604 @default.
• W2022359623 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.02.033" @default.
• W2022359623 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/2944007" @default.
• W2022359623 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20561686" @default.
• W2022359623 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2022359623 type Work @default.
• W2022359623 sameAs 2022359623 @default.
• W2022359623 citedByCount "25" @default.
• W2022359623 countsByYear W20223596232012 @default.
• W2022359623 countsByYear W20223596232013 @default.
• W2022359623 countsByYear W20223596232014 @default.
• W2022359623 countsByYear W20223596232015 @default.
• W2022359623 countsByYear W20223596232016 @default.
• W2022359623 countsByYear W20223596232017 @default.
• W2022359623 countsByYear W20223596232018 @default.
• W2022359623 countsByYear W20223596232019 @default.
• W2022359623 countsByYear W20223596232020 @default.
• W2022359623 countsByYear W20223596232022 @default.
• W2022359623 countsByYear W20223596232023 @default.
• W2022359623 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2022359623 hasAuthorship W2022359623A5006255873 @default.
• W2022359623 hasAuthorship W2022359623A5009887285 @default.
• W2022359623 hasAuthorship W2022359623A5033904790 @default.
• W2022359623 hasAuthorship W2022359623A5039958951 @default.
• W2022359623 hasAuthorship W2022359623A5053386702 @default.
• W2022359623 hasAuthorship W2022359623A5056249618 @default.
• W2022359623 hasAuthorship W2022359623A5063489579 @default.
• W2022359623 hasAuthorship W2022359623A5068302775 @default.
• W2022359623 hasAuthorship W2022359623A5071253903 @default.
• W2022359623 hasAuthorship W2022359623A5088078791 @default.
• W2022359623 hasAuthorship W2022359623A5090802305 @default.
• W2022359623 hasBestOaLocation W20223596232 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConcept C119767625 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConcept C147176958 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConcept C163864269 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConcept C2776148792 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConcept C2777286243 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConcept C2778113962 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConcept C2778724333 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConcept C2780225610 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConcept C61863361 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConcept C83849319 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConceptScore W2022359623C105795698 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConceptScore W2022359623C118487528 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConceptScore W2022359623C119767625 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConceptScore W2022359623C127413603 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConceptScore W2022359623C138496976 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConceptScore W2022359623C138885662 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConceptScore W2022359623C147176958 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConceptScore W2022359623C15744967 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConceptScore W2022359623C163864269 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConceptScore W2022359623C2776148792 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConceptScore W2022359623C2777286243 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConceptScore W2022359623C2778113962 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConceptScore W2022359623C2778724333 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConceptScore W2022359623C2780225610 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConceptScore W2022359623C33923547 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConceptScore W2022359623C41895202 @default.
• W2022359623 hasConceptScore W2022359623C61863361 @default.

• next