FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2022366048> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2022366048 endingPage "303" @default.
• W2022366048 startingPage "301" @default.
• W2022366048 abstract "Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging has been used to optimize stent implantation in coronary arteries. 1 Fitzgerald P.J. Oshima A. Hayase M. Metz J.A. Bailey S.R. Baim D.S. Cleman M.W. Deutsch E. Diver D.J. Leon M.B. et al. CRUISE InvestigatorsFinal results of the Can Routine Ultrasound Influence Stent Expansion (CRUISE) study. Circulation. 2000; 102: 523-530 Crossref PubMed Scopus (386) Google Scholar , 2 Schiele F. Meneveau N. Vuillemenot A. Zhang D.D. Gupta S. Mercier M. Danchin N. Bertrand B. Bassand J.P. Impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance in stent deployment on 6- month restenosis rate a multicenter, randomized study comparing two strategies—with and without intravascular ultrasound guidance. RESIST Study Group. REStenosis after Ivus guided STenting. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 32: 320-328 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (206) Google Scholar Despite optimum angiographic appearance, stents are often underexpanded using IVUS criteria. Several studies have demonstrated that IVUS-derived lumen dimensions (diameter or area) after stent placement predict the rate of restenosis. 3 Hoffmann R. Mintz G.S. Mehran R. Pichard A.D. Kent K.M. Satler L.F. Popma J.J. Wu H. Leon M.B. Intravascular ultrasound predictors of angiographic restenosis in lesions treated with Palmaz-Schatz stents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 31: 43-49 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (274) Google Scholar , 4 Kastrati A. Schomig A. Elezi S. Schuhlen H. Dirschinger J. Hadamitzky M. Wehinger A. Hausleiter J. Walter H. Neumann F.J. Predictive factors of restenosis after coronary stent placement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 30: 1428-1436 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (653) Google Scholar , 5 Moussa I. Moses J. Di Mario C. Albiero R. De Gregorio J. Adamian M. Di Francesco L. Colombo A. Does the specific intravascular ultrasound criterion used to optimize stent expansion have an impact on the probability of stent restenosis?. Am J Cardiol. 1999; 83: 1012-1017 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (107) Google Scholar , 6 Hong M.K. Park S.W. Mintz G.S. Lee N.H. Lee C.W. Kim J.J. Park S.J. Intravascular ultrasonic predictors of angiographic restenosis after long coronary stenting. Am J Cardiol. 2000; 85: 441-445 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (38) Google Scholar The applied diagnostic value of these parameters has not been established, because a working definition of adequate stent expansion has not been tested. In this study, a binary threshold for minimal stent area (MSA) that minimizes target lesion revascularization (TLR) was determined from a large cohort multicenter trial." @default.
• W2022366048 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2022366048 creator A5007580598 @default.
• W2022366048 creator A5009224311 @default.
• W2022366048 creator A5015786929 @default.
• W2022366048 creator A5020833434 @default.
• W2022366048 creator A5027124029 @default.
• W2022366048 creator A5032912143 @default.
• W2022366048 creator A5059217394 @default.
• W2022366048 creator A5060933839 @default.
• W2022366048 creator A5073478428 @default.
• W2022366048 date "2001-08-01" @default.
• W2022366048 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2022366048 title "An optimal diagnostic threshold for minimal stent area to predict target lesion revascularization following stent implantation in native coronary lesions" @default.
• W2022366048 cites W1966090243 @default.
• W2022366048 cites W1968629173 @default.
• W2022366048 cites W1972928240 @default.
• W2022366048 cites W1979680897 @default.
• W2022366048 cites W1979789668 @default.
• W2022366048 cites W1998950920 @default.
• W2022366048 cites W2036872051 @default.
• W2022366048 cites W2054683048 @default.
• W2022366048 cites W2082720790 @default.
• W2022366048 cites W2102928915 @default.
• W2022366048 cites W2104396672 @default.
• W2022366048 cites W2118296918 @default.
• W2022366048 cites W2121998261 @default.
• W2022366048 cites W2147134748 @default.
• W2022366048 cites W2162659695 @default.
• W2022366048 cites W2165993944 @default.
• W2022366048 cites W2166597533 @default.
• W2022366048 cites W2327850977 @default.
• W2022366048 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01646-0" @default.
• W2022366048 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11472713" @default.
• W2022366048 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
• W2022366048 type Work @default.
• W2022366048 sameAs 2022366048 @default.
• W2022366048 citedByCount "53" @default.
• W2022366048 countsByYear W20223660482012 @default.
• W2022366048 countsByYear W20223660482014 @default.
• W2022366048 countsByYear W20223660482015 @default.
• W2022366048 countsByYear W20223660482016 @default.
• W2022366048 countsByYear W20223660482017 @default.
• W2022366048 countsByYear W20223660482018 @default.
• W2022366048 countsByYear W20223660482019 @default.
• W2022366048 countsByYear W20223660482020 @default.
• W2022366048 countsByYear W20223660482021 @default.
• W2022366048 countsByYear W20223660482022 @default.
• W2022366048 countsByYear W20223660482023 @default.
• W2022366048 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2022366048 hasAuthorship W2022366048A5007580598 @default.
• W2022366048 hasAuthorship W2022366048A5009224311 @default.
• W2022366048 hasAuthorship W2022366048A5015786929 @default.
• W2022366048 hasAuthorship W2022366048A5020833434 @default.
• W2022366048 hasAuthorship W2022366048A5027124029 @default.
• W2022366048 hasAuthorship W2022366048A5032912143 @default.
• W2022366048 hasAuthorship W2022366048A5059217394 @default.
• W2022366048 hasAuthorship W2022366048A5060933839 @default.
• W2022366048 hasAuthorship W2022366048A5073478428 @default.
• W2022366048 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2022366048 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2022366048 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W2022366048 hasConcept C2776931568 @default.
• W2022366048 hasConcept C2778283817 @default.
• W2022366048 hasConcept C2778583881 @default.
• W2022366048 hasConcept C2779464278 @default.
• W2022366048 hasConcept C45393284 @default.
• W2022366048 hasConcept C500558357 @default.
• W2022366048 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2022366048 hasConceptScore W2022366048C126322002 @default.
• W2022366048 hasConceptScore W2022366048C126838900 @default.
• W2022366048 hasConceptScore W2022366048C164705383 @default.
• W2022366048 hasConceptScore W2022366048C2776931568 @default.
• W2022366048 hasConceptScore W2022366048C2778283817 @default.
• W2022366048 hasConceptScore W2022366048C2778583881 @default.
• W2022366048 hasConceptScore W2022366048C2779464278 @default.
• W2022366048 hasConceptScore W2022366048C45393284 @default.
• W2022366048 hasConceptScore W2022366048C500558357 @default.
• W2022366048 hasConceptScore W2022366048C71924100 @default.
• W2022366048 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2022366048 hasLocation W20223660481 @default.
• W2022366048 hasLocation W20223660482 @default.
• W2022366048 hasOpenAccess W2022366048 @default.
• W2022366048 hasPrimaryLocation W20223660481 @default.
• W2022366048 hasRelatedWork W1545917144 @default.
• W2022366048 hasRelatedWork W1620889041 @default.
• W2022366048 hasRelatedWork W1797073027 @default.
• W2022366048 hasRelatedWork W2367282337 @default.
• W2022366048 hasRelatedWork W2380431444 @default.
• W2022366048 hasRelatedWork W2610154244 @default.
• W2022366048 hasRelatedWork W2921158736 @default.
• W2022366048 hasRelatedWork W3008373581 @default.
• W2022366048 hasRelatedWork W4237029273 @default.
• W2022366048 hasRelatedWork W4286918265 @default.
• W2022366048 hasVolume "88" @default.
• W2022366048 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2022366048 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2022366048 magId "2022366048" @default.

• next