FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2022588565> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2022588565 endingPage "594.e2" @default.
• W2022588565 startingPage "589" @default.
• W2022588565 abstract "BackgroundThe optimal duplex ultrasound (DUS) velocity criteria to determine in-stent carotid restenosis are controversial. We previously reported the optimal DUS velocities for ≥30% in-stent restenosis. This prospective study will further define the optimal velocities in detecting various severities of in-stent restenosis: ≥30%, ≥50%, and 80% to 99%.MethodsThe analysis included 144 patients who underwent carotid artery stenting as a part of clinical trials. All patients had completion arteriograms and underwent postoperative carotid DUS imaging, which was repeated at 1 month and every 6 months thereafter. Patients with peak systolic velocities (PSVs) of the internal carotid artery (ICA) of ≥130 cm/s underwent carotid computed tomography (CT)/angiogram. The PSVs and end-diastolic velocities of the ICA and common carotid artery (CCA) and the PSV of the ICA/CCA ratios were recorded. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was used to determine the optimal velocity criteria for the diagnosis of ≥30, ≥50, and ≥80% restenosis.ResultsThe mean follow-up was 20 months (range, 1-78 months). Available for analysis were 215 pairs of imaging (DUS vs CTA/angiography) studies. The accuracy of CTA vs carotid arteriogram was confirmed in a subset of 22 patients (κ = 0.81). The ROC analysis demonstrated that an ICA PSV of ≥154 cm/s was optimal for ≥30% stenosis with a sensitivity of 99%, specificity of 89%, positive-predictive value (PPV) of 96%, negative-predictive value (NPV) of 97%, and overall accuracy (OA) of 96%. An ICA EDV of 42 cm/s had sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and OA in detecting ≥30% stenosis of 86%, 62%, 87%, 60%, and 80%, respectively. An ICA PSV of ≥224 cm/s was optimal for >50% stenosis with a sensitivity of 99%, specificity of 90%, PPV of 99%, NPV of 90%, and OA of 98%. An ICA EDV of 88 cm/s had sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and OA in detecting ≥50% stenosis of 96%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 53%, and 96%. An ICA/CCA ratio of 3.439 had sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and OA in detecting ≥50% stenosis of 96%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 58%, and 96%, respectively. An ICA PSV of ≥325 cm/s was optimal for >80% stenosis with a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 99%, PPV of 100%, NPV of 88%, and OA of 99%. An ICA EDV of 119 cm/sec had sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and OA in detecting ≥80% stenosis of 99%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 75%, and 99%, respectively. The PSV of the stented artery was a better predictor for in-stent restenosis than the end-diastolic velocity or ICA/CCA ratio.ConclusionThe optimal DUS velocity criteria for in-stent restenosis of ≥30%, ≥50%, and ≥80% were the PSVs of 154, 224, and 325 cm/s, respectively. The optimal duplex ultrasound (DUS) velocity criteria to determine in-stent carotid restenosis are controversial. We previously reported the optimal DUS velocities for ≥30% in-stent restenosis. This prospective study will further define the optimal velocities in detecting various severities of in-stent restenosis: ≥30%, ≥50%, and 80% to 99%. The analysis included 144 patients who underwent carotid artery stenting as a part of clinical trials. All patients had completion arteriograms and underwent postoperative carotid DUS imaging, which was repeated at 1 month and every 6 months thereafter. Patients with peak systolic velocities (PSVs) of the internal carotid artery (ICA) of ≥130 cm/s underwent carotid computed tomography (CT)/angiogram. The PSVs and end-diastolic velocities of the ICA and common carotid artery (CCA) and the PSV of the ICA/CCA ratios were recorded. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was used to determine the optimal velocity criteria for the diagnosis of ≥30, ≥50, and ≥80% restenosis. The mean follow-up was 20 months (range, 1-78 months). Available for analysis were 215 pairs of imaging (DUS vs CTA/angiography) studies. The accuracy of CTA vs carotid arteriogram was confirmed in a subset of 22 patients (κ = 0.81). The ROC analysis demonstrated that an ICA PSV of ≥154 cm/s was optimal for ≥30% stenosis with a sensitivity of 99%, specificity of 89%, positive-predictive value (PPV) of 96%, negative-predictive value (NPV) of 97%, and overall accuracy (OA) of 96%. An ICA EDV of 42 cm/s had sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and OA in detecting ≥30% stenosis of 86%, 62%, 87%, 60%, and 80%, respectively. An ICA PSV of ≥224 cm/s was optimal for >50% stenosis with a sensitivity of 99%, specificity of 90%, PPV of 99%, NPV of 90%, and OA of 98%. An ICA EDV of 88 cm/s had sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and OA in detecting ≥50% stenosis of 96%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 53%, and 96%. An ICA/CCA ratio of 3.439 had sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and OA in detecting ≥50% stenosis of 96%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 58%, and 96%, respectively. An ICA PSV of ≥325 cm/s was optimal for >80% stenosis with a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 99%, PPV of 100%, NPV of 88%, and OA of 99%. An ICA EDV of 119 cm/sec had sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and OA in detecting ≥80% stenosis of 99%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 75%, and 99%, respectively. The PSV of the stented artery was a better predictor for in-stent restenosis than the end-diastolic velocity or ICA/CCA ratio. The optimal DUS velocity criteria for in-stent restenosis of ≥30%, ≥50%, and ≥80% were the PSVs of 154, 224, and 325 cm/s, respectively." @default.
• W2022588565 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2022588565 creator A5004633562 @default.
• W2022588565 creator A5026510473 @default.
• W2022588565 creator A5026968199 @default.
• W2022588565 creator A5050741430 @default.
• W2022588565 creator A5051022935 @default.
• W2022588565 creator A5061921420 @default.
• W2022588565 creator A5090164067 @default.
• W2022588565 date "2008-09-01" @default.
• W2022588565 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2022588565 title "Optimal carotid duplex velocity criteria for defining the severity of carotid in-stent restenosis" @default.
• W2022588565 cites W1993904435 @default.
• W2022588565 cites W1998003306 @default.
• W2022588565 cites W1998145155 @default.
• W2022588565 cites W2024575248 @default.
• W2022588565 cites W2038169486 @default.
• W2022588565 cites W2054003513 @default.
• W2022588565 cites W2065368898 @default.
• W2022588565 cites W2075468119 @default.
• W2022588565 cites W2090480732 @default.
• W2022588565 cites W2100858319 @default.
• W2022588565 cites W2103742048 @default.
• W2022588565 cites W2116033518 @default.
• W2022588565 cites W2123898975 @default.
• W2022588565 cites W2129417841 @default.
• W2022588565 cites W2144088700 @default.
• W2022588565 cites W2418538124 @default.
• W2022588565 cites W2767911074 @default.
• W2022588565 cites W4230727191 @default.
• W2022588565 cites W4242780097 @default.
• W2022588565 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2008.04.004" @default.
• W2022588565 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18586444" @default.
• W2022588565 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2022588565 type Work @default.
• W2022588565 sameAs 2022588565 @default.
• W2022588565 citedByCount "124" @default.
• W2022588565 countsByYear W20225885652012 @default.
• W2022588565 countsByYear W20225885652013 @default.
• W2022588565 countsByYear W20225885652014 @default.
• W2022588565 countsByYear W20225885652015 @default.
• W2022588565 countsByYear W20225885652016 @default.
• W2022588565 countsByYear W20225885652017 @default.
• W2022588565 countsByYear W20225885652018 @default.
• W2022588565 countsByYear W20225885652019 @default.
• W2022588565 countsByYear W20225885652020 @default.
• W2022588565 countsByYear W20225885652021 @default.
• W2022588565 countsByYear W20225885652022 @default.
• W2022588565 countsByYear W20225885652023 @default.
• W2022588565 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2022588565 hasAuthorship W2022588565A5004633562 @default.
• W2022588565 hasAuthorship W2022588565A5026510473 @default.
• W2022588565 hasAuthorship W2022588565A5026968199 @default.
• W2022588565 hasAuthorship W2022588565A5050741430 @default.
• W2022588565 hasAuthorship W2022588565A5051022935 @default.
• W2022588565 hasAuthorship W2022588565A5061921420 @default.
• W2022588565 hasAuthorship W2022588565A5090164067 @default.
• W2022588565 hasBestOaLocation W20225885651 @default.
• W2022588565 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2022588565 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2022588565 hasConcept C143753070 @default.
• W2022588565 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W2022588565 hasConcept C2778283817 @default.
• W2022588565 hasConcept C2778333808 @default.
• W2022588565 hasConcept C2778583881 @default.
• W2022588565 hasConcept C2780007028 @default.
• W2022588565 hasConcept C2780643987 @default.
• W2022588565 hasConcept C2781064879 @default.
• W2022588565 hasConcept C2781347138 @default.
• W2022588565 hasConcept C2987047532 @default.
• W2022588565 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2022588565 hasConcept C58471807 @default.
• W2022588565 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2022588565 hasConceptScore W2022588565C126322002 @default.
• W2022588565 hasConceptScore W2022588565C126838900 @default.
• W2022588565 hasConceptScore W2022588565C143753070 @default.
• W2022588565 hasConceptScore W2022588565C164705383 @default.
• W2022588565 hasConceptScore W2022588565C2778283817 @default.
• W2022588565 hasConceptScore W2022588565C2778333808 @default.
• W2022588565 hasConceptScore W2022588565C2778583881 @default.
• W2022588565 hasConceptScore W2022588565C2780007028 @default.
• W2022588565 hasConceptScore W2022588565C2780643987 @default.
• W2022588565 hasConceptScore W2022588565C2781064879 @default.
• W2022588565 hasConceptScore W2022588565C2781347138 @default.
• W2022588565 hasConceptScore W2022588565C2987047532 @default.
• W2022588565 hasConceptScore W2022588565C2989005 @default.
• W2022588565 hasConceptScore W2022588565C58471807 @default.
• W2022588565 hasConceptScore W2022588565C71924100 @default.
• W2022588565 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2022588565 hasLocation W20225885651 @default.
• W2022588565 hasLocation W20225885652 @default.
• W2022588565 hasOpenAccess W2022588565 @default.
• W2022588565 hasPrimaryLocation W20225885651 @default.
• W2022588565 hasRelatedWork W2023737161 @default.
• W2022588565 hasRelatedWork W2084623411 @default.
• W2022588565 hasRelatedWork W2156215817 @default.
• W2022588565 hasRelatedWork W2266216519 @default.
• W2022588565 hasRelatedWork W2369316052 @default.

• next