FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2022602037> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2022602037 endingPage "542" @default.
• W2022602037 startingPage "513" @default.
• W2022602037 abstract "INTRODUCTION Sources of information.-In this monograph, the reviewers have taken advantage of their personal familiarity with the research on the Limulus eye to introduce the reader to some unpublished research where it seemed appropriate. This unpublished research has been mentioned only to make the prevalence of certain theories more understandable. There are hazards attached to any unpublished work. It may not have been done carefully, or there may be certain features of it which are not understood well enough to allow a coherent publication of it. We feel that it is important to the reader for us to present all the theories which have been published or are widely held, along with the experimental evidence that supports them. Most of the unpublished material is well known to all the workers in the field, and this review will serve to extend the knowledge of the conceptions (and misconceptions) that are current. The bibliography does not refer to all the printed work. Unless a complete listing of papers is necessary, only the latest paper in a series on a particular subject is presented. There are two excellent reviews on the physiology of the compound eye (1, 2) which will serve to supplement the present one, especially on the comparative aspects of the subject. Scope .-The Limulus eye has been worked on extensively by many groups of investigators. This review is an attempt to present a synthesis of our knowledge of both the structure and function. Perhaps this will serve as a paradigm for the processes which any eye must possess in order to function. The horseshoe crab eye has been picked because more work has been done on it than on any other type of eye. It has a relatively uncompli­ cated structure; only two types of neurons are present. The functions of each and the relations between them will be described below. The Limulus eye was initially described almost 200 years ago by Andre (3). He concerned himself mainly with depicting the crystalline cones of the cornea of the eye. In recent years, chiefly through the efforts of Hart­ line and his co-workers (4) , the Limulus eye has been recognized as the" @default.
• W2022602037 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2022602037 creator A5042754961 @default.
• W2022602037 creator A5077839528 @default.
• W2022602037 date "1967-03-01" @default.
• W2022602037 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2022602037 title "Visual Processes in the Limulus Eye" @default.
• W2022602037 cites W1678355425 @default.
• W2022602037 cites W1963829377 @default.
• W2022602037 cites W1978218655 @default.
• W2022602037 cites W1985965432 @default.
• W2022602037 cites W1992572576 @default.
• W2022602037 cites W2005923461 @default.
• W2022602037 cites W2008648302 @default.
• W2022602037 cites W2013759370 @default.
• W2022602037 cites W2015957699 @default.
• W2022602037 cites W2018147020 @default.
• W2022602037 cites W2026378813 @default.
• W2022602037 cites W2041181954 @default.
• W2022602037 cites W2041474865 @default.
• W2022602037 cites W2041680969 @default.
• W2022602037 cites W2051990584 @default.
• W2022602037 cites W2067720172 @default.
• W2022602037 cites W2071737956 @default.
• W2022602037 cites W2074956343 @default.
• W2022602037 cites W2078543761 @default.
• W2022602037 cites W2099907244 @default.
• W2022602037 cites W2107743503 @default.
• W2022602037 cites W2126108384 @default.
• W2022602037 cites W2145511217 @default.
• W2022602037 cites W2152164341 @default.
• W2022602037 cites W2156364493 @default.
• W2022602037 cites W2200825208 @default.
• W2022602037 cites W2318849296 @default.
• W2022602037 cites W2409244746 @default.
• W2022602037 cites W2488437886 @default.
• W2022602037 cites W2551555305 @default.
• W2022602037 cites W2885773017 @default.
• W2022602037 cites W1974773414 @default.
• W2022602037 cites W2404090493 @default.
• W2022602037 cites W2604765576 @default.
• W2022602037 doi "https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ph.29.030167.002501" @default.
• W2022602037 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5335441" @default.
• W2022602037 hasPublicationYear "1967" @default.
• W2022602037 type Work @default.
• W2022602037 sameAs 2022602037 @default.
• W2022602037 citedByCount "38" @default.
• W2022602037 countsByYear W20226020372015 @default.
• W2022602037 countsByYear W20226020372018 @default.
• W2022602037 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2022602037 hasAuthorship W2022602037A5042754961 @default.
• W2022602037 hasAuthorship W2022602037A5077839528 @default.
• W2022602037 hasConcept C2776487282 @default.
• W2022602037 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2022602037 hasConcept C78458016 @default.
• W2022602037 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2022602037 hasConceptScore W2022602037C2776487282 @default.
• W2022602037 hasConceptScore W2022602037C41008148 @default.
• W2022602037 hasConceptScore W2022602037C78458016 @default.
• W2022602037 hasConceptScore W2022602037C86803240 @default.
• W2022602037 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2022602037 hasLocation W20226020371 @default.
• W2022602037 hasLocation W20226020372 @default.
• W2022602037 hasOpenAccess W2022602037 @default.
• W2022602037 hasPrimaryLocation W20226020371 @default.
• W2022602037 hasRelatedWork W1484570192 @default.
• W2022602037 hasRelatedWork W1963653780 @default.
• W2022602037 hasRelatedWork W1974752725 @default.
• W2022602037 hasRelatedWork W2000213265 @default.
• W2022602037 hasRelatedWork W2035858869 @default.
• W2022602037 hasRelatedWork W2187256004 @default.
• W2022602037 hasRelatedWork W2230787873 @default.
• W2022602037 hasRelatedWork W2403303863 @default.
• W2022602037 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2022602037 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2022602037 hasVolume "29" @default.
• W2022602037 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2022602037 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2022602037 magId "2022602037" @default.
• W2022602037 workType "article" @default.