FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2022609265> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2022609265 endingPage "273" @default.
• W2022609265 startingPage "261" @default.
• W2022609265 abstract "The aim of this paper was to explore how patients experience an initial oncology consultation. This study was part of a larger mixed methods research project designed to address the issue of improving communication and enhancing patient satisfaction with oncology consultations.Interpretive phenomenological analysis was used to interpret the participants' meanings of their experiences in their initial consultation. It is an idiographic approach that focuses in depth on a small set of cases in order to explore how individuals make sense of a similar experience. This retains the complexity and diversity of experiences.In the larger study, semi-structured interviews were carried out with 36 patients as soon as possible after a consultation in oncology to explore their experiences. Five cases were selected for this study on the basis of homogeneity; they had all undergone some prior investigations of their illness, and this was their first consultation in oncology; they all provided rich accounts relating to how they had experienced the consultation.Patients' experiences of being given their diagnosis differed both between participants and within the same participant. Various defences seemed to be used in order to protect them from fully engaging with the knowledge they were given. Their accounts of what they wished to know in the consultation could be affected by a desire to protect themselves and/or family members from distress and by the practical need to know that may vary over time.The complexity of patients' needs and preferences regarding information means that the doctor's role in communicating that information in a patient-centred way is difficult. The findings are discussed in relation to open awareness theory as to how the emotional context of the consultation process affects information needs. Doctors need strategies to elicit information from patients about their needs from the consultation. This needs to be done at the start of consultations and throughout investigations and treatment, as needs may change over time. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject? Patients' desire to know information is sometimes tempered with by a desire to avoid distress to themselves. Patients do not always understand or make accurate sense of what they have been told. Receiving a diagnosis of cancer is distressing for patients. What does this study add? Doctors need strategies to elicit information from patients about their needs for each consultation. This needs to be done consistently throughout the patient journey as needs may change over time. Patients control what they do or do not do with information but do not openly share this with the doctor. Our interpretations of the interviews stray beyond the conscious accounts of the consultations and draw on (unconscious) absences that may also be of significance in making sense of overall experience. The complexity of patients' needs and preferences regarding information means that the doctors' role is very difficult. Patients have a right to know but not a duty to know their diagnosis and prognosis." @default.
• W2022609265 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2022609265 creator A5005087758 @default.
• W2022609265 creator A5012273263 @default.
• W2022609265 creator A5036652391 @default.
• W2022609265 creator A5060639360 @default.
• W2022609265 date "2014-03-15" @default.
• W2022609265 modified "2023-10-05" @default.
• W2022609265 title "Patients' experiences of an initial consultation in oncology: Knowing and not knowing" @default.
• W2022609265 cites W1599579423 @default.
• W2022609265 cites W1983077194 @default.
• W2022609265 cites W1986894783 @default.
• W2022609265 cites W2002783201 @default.
• W2022609265 cites W2010202937 @default.
• W2022609265 cites W2021269636 @default.
• W2022609265 cites W2024673447 @default.
• W2022609265 cites W2085052854 @default.
• W2022609265 cites W2085826762 @default.
• W2022609265 cites W2087422789 @default.
• W2022609265 cites W2098401841 @default.
• W2022609265 cites W2099716787 @default.
• W2022609265 cites W2116502213 @default.
• W2022609265 cites W2119277569 @default.
• W2022609265 cites W2126801988 @default.
• W2022609265 cites W2129820723 @default.
• W2022609265 cites W2142475232 @default.
• W2022609265 cites W2156096800 @default.
• W2022609265 cites W2157737458 @default.
• W2022609265 cites W2166244595 @default.
• W2022609265 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12096" @default.
• W2022609265 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24628860" @default.
• W2022609265 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2022609265 type Work @default.
• W2022609265 sameAs 2022609265 @default.
• W2022609265 citedByCount "11" @default.
• W2022609265 countsByYear W20226092652016 @default.
• W2022609265 countsByYear W20226092652018 @default.
• W2022609265 countsByYear W20226092652019 @default.
• W2022609265 countsByYear W20226092652022 @default.
• W2022609265 countsByYear W20226092652023 @default.
• W2022609265 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2022609265 hasAuthorship W2022609265A5005087758 @default.
• W2022609265 hasAuthorship W2022609265A5012273263 @default.
• W2022609265 hasAuthorship W2022609265A5036652391 @default.
• W2022609265 hasAuthorship W2022609265A5060639360 @default.
• W2022609265 hasConcept C139265228 @default.
• W2022609265 hasConcept C143998085 @default.
• W2022609265 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2022609265 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2022609265 hasConcept C177264268 @default.
• W2022609265 hasConcept C179034447 @default.
• W2022609265 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W2022609265 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2022609265 hasConcept C2781316041 @default.
• W2022609265 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2022609265 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2022609265 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2022609265 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2022609265 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2022609265 hasConceptScore W2022609265C139265228 @default.
• W2022609265 hasConceptScore W2022609265C143998085 @default.
• W2022609265 hasConceptScore W2022609265C144024400 @default.
• W2022609265 hasConceptScore W2022609265C15744967 @default.
• W2022609265 hasConceptScore W2022609265C177264268 @default.
• W2022609265 hasConceptScore W2022609265C179034447 @default.
• W2022609265 hasConceptScore W2022609265C19165224 @default.
• W2022609265 hasConceptScore W2022609265C199360897 @default.
• W2022609265 hasConceptScore W2022609265C2781316041 @default.
• W2022609265 hasConceptScore W2022609265C41008148 @default.
• W2022609265 hasConceptScore W2022609265C509550671 @default.
• W2022609265 hasConceptScore W2022609265C70410870 @default.
• W2022609265 hasConceptScore W2022609265C71924100 @default.
• W2022609265 hasConceptScore W2022609265C77805123 @default.
• W2022609265 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2022609265 hasLocation W20226092651 @default.
• W2022609265 hasLocation W20226092652 @default.
• W2022609265 hasOpenAccess W2022609265 @default.
• W2022609265 hasPrimaryLocation W20226092651 @default.
• W2022609265 hasRelatedWork W1969360328 @default.
• W2022609265 hasRelatedWork W1971077544 @default.
• W2022609265 hasRelatedWork W2033638474 @default.
• W2022609265 hasRelatedWork W2040206321 @default.
• W2022609265 hasRelatedWork W2068260166 @default.
• W2022609265 hasRelatedWork W2095371768 @default.
• W2022609265 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2022609265 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2022609265 hasRelatedWork W3036523352 @default.
• W2022609265 hasRelatedWork W4245427823 @default.
• W2022609265 hasVolume "20" @default.
• W2022609265 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2022609265 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2022609265 magId "2022609265" @default.
• W2022609265 workType "article" @default.