FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2022671664> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2022671664 endingPage "204" @default.
• W2022671664 startingPage "199" @default.
• W2022671664 abstract "Delivering a non-pharmacological symptom management intervention in patients with lung cancer is often challenging due to difficulties with recruitment, high attrition rates, high symptom burden, and other methodological problems. The aim of the present study was to elicit quantitative estimates of utility (benefit) associated with different attribute levels (delivery options) of a symptom management intervention in lung cancer patients.An application of Best-Worst scaling methodology was used. Effects (attributes) tested included the location of the intervention (home or hospital), type of trainer (health professional or trained volunteer), caregiver involvement or not, and intervention delivered individually or in groups of patients. Participants were asked to evaluate and compare their preferences (utilities) towards the different attribute levels within scenarios and select the pair of attribute levels that they consider to be furthest apart.Eighty-seven patients with lung cancer participated. The most important preferences for an intervention included the location (being delivered at home) and delivered by a health care professional. The least important preference was the involvement of a caregiver. Gender had an effect on preferences, with females being less inclined than men to prefer to receive an intervention in the home than the hospital and less inclined than men to have no other patients present. Furthermore, older participants and those in advanced stages of their disease were less inclined to have no other patients present compared to younger participants and those with earlier stages of disease, respectively.Considering patient preferences is an important step in developing feasible, patient-centred, appropriate and methodologically rigorous interventions and this study provided indications of such patient preferences." @default.
• W2022671664 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2022671664 creator A5002524476 @default.
• W2022671664 creator A5004345205 @default.
• W2022671664 creator A5005808294 @default.
• W2022671664 creator A5026483927 @default.
• W2022671664 creator A5028595264 @default.
• W2022671664 creator A5053708270 @default.
• W2022671664 creator A5054171841 @default.
• W2022671664 creator A5065861382 @default.
• W2022671664 creator A5069095893 @default.
• W2022671664 creator A5072547844 @default.
• W2022671664 creator A5076939789 @default.
• W2022671664 creator A5083114880 @default.
• W2022671664 creator A5089954905 @default.
• W2022671664 date "2012-07-01" @default.
• W2022671664 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W2022671664 title "Applying Best–Worst scaling methodology to establish delivery preferences of a symptom supportive care intervention in patients with lung cancer" @default.
• W2022671664 cites W1967932918 @default.
• W2022671664 cites W1969475249 @default.
• W2022671664 cites W1985466424 @default.
• W2022671664 cites W1999363692 @default.
• W2022671664 cites W2043284314 @default.
• W2022671664 cites W2048511308 @default.
• W2022671664 cites W2086276818 @default.
• W2022671664 cites W2101321314 @default.
• W2022671664 cites W2102133209 @default.
• W2022671664 cites W2102355417 @default.
• W2022671664 cites W2102521213 @default.
• W2022671664 cites W2136546505 @default.
• W2022671664 cites W2150301729 @default.
• W2022671664 cites W2157237487 @default.
• W2022671664 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2012.02.001" @default.
• W2022671664 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22385926" @default.
• W2022671664 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2022671664 type Work @default.
• W2022671664 sameAs 2022671664 @default.
• W2022671664 citedByCount "25" @default.
• W2022671664 countsByYear W20226716642014 @default.
• W2022671664 countsByYear W20226716642015 @default.
• W2022671664 countsByYear W20226716642016 @default.
• W2022671664 countsByYear W20226716642017 @default.
• W2022671664 countsByYear W20226716642018 @default.
• W2022671664 countsByYear W20226716642019 @default.
• W2022671664 countsByYear W20226716642020 @default.
• W2022671664 countsByYear W20226716642021 @default.
• W2022671664 countsByYear W20226716642022 @default.
• W2022671664 countsByYear W20226716642023 @default.
• W2022671664 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2022671664 hasAuthorship W2022671664A5002524476 @default.
• W2022671664 hasAuthorship W2022671664A5004345205 @default.
• W2022671664 hasAuthorship W2022671664A5005808294 @default.
• W2022671664 hasAuthorship W2022671664A5026483927 @default.
• W2022671664 hasAuthorship W2022671664A5028595264 @default.
• W2022671664 hasAuthorship W2022671664A5053708270 @default.
• W2022671664 hasAuthorship W2022671664A5054171841 @default.
• W2022671664 hasAuthorship W2022671664A5065861382 @default.
• W2022671664 hasAuthorship W2022671664A5069095893 @default.
• W2022671664 hasAuthorship W2022671664A5072547844 @default.
• W2022671664 hasAuthorship W2022671664A5076939789 @default.
• W2022671664 hasAuthorship W2022671664A5083114880 @default.
• W2022671664 hasAuthorship W2022671664A5089954905 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConcept C175444787 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConcept C2776256026 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConcept C2780463512 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConcept C2780553607 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConcept C2780665704 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConcept C2781249084 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConceptScore W2022671664C126322002 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConceptScore W2022671664C142724271 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConceptScore W2022671664C159110408 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConceptScore W2022671664C160735492 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConceptScore W2022671664C162324750 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConceptScore W2022671664C175444787 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConceptScore W2022671664C1862650 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConceptScore W2022671664C199343813 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConceptScore W2022671664C199360897 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConceptScore W2022671664C27415008 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConceptScore W2022671664C2776256026 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConceptScore W2022671664C2779134260 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConceptScore W2022671664C2780463512 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConceptScore W2022671664C2780553607 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConceptScore W2022671664C2780665704 @default.
• W2022671664 hasConceptScore W2022671664C2781249084 @default.

• next