FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2022760146> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2022760146 endingPage "95" @default.
• W2022760146 startingPage "91" @default.
• W2022760146 abstract "Recent reports have suggested that duplex scanning is an ideal method to noninvasively assess the incidence of recurrent carotid stenosis. However, the timing and frequency of the follow-up studies are controversial. In the present study, 150 patients underwent 173 carotid endarterectomy procedures over a 2 year period. In the postoperative period, a total of 210 duplex studies were carried out on 117 carotid arteries. 21.4 percent of the 117 arteries studied had recurrent stenosis of 16 percent or greater at a mean postoperative follow-up of 15.2±3 months. Recurrent stenoses were detected early after operation; 96 percent were detected at or before 15 months postoperatively. Patients with recurrent stenoses remained stable and had infrequent symptoms. Several risk factors placed the patient at increased risk for recurrent carotid stenosis: presence of contralateral disease (defined as stenosis of 50 percent or greater), use of tacking sutures, and continued smoking in the postoperative period. Although it remains important for researchers to thoroughly investigate the natural history of atherosclerosis of the extracranial carotid artery, including those changes that occur after carotid endarterectomy, our results indicate that frequent duplex scanning in the first postoperative year is unnecessary and is not cost-effective. Duplex follow-up studies 1 and 12 months after carotid endarterectomy are sufficient for assessing the problem of recurrent stenosis in the first postoperative year. Recent reports have suggested that duplex scanning is an ideal method to noninvasively assess the incidence of recurrent carotid stenosis. However, the timing and frequency of the follow-up studies are controversial. In the present study, 150 patients underwent 173 carotid endarterectomy procedures over a 2 year period. In the postoperative period, a total of 210 duplex studies were carried out on 117 carotid arteries. 21.4 percent of the 117 arteries studied had recurrent stenosis of 16 percent or greater at a mean postoperative follow-up of 15.2±3 months. Recurrent stenoses were detected early after operation; 96 percent were detected at or before 15 months postoperatively. Patients with recurrent stenoses remained stable and had infrequent symptoms. Several risk factors placed the patient at increased risk for recurrent carotid stenosis: presence of contralateral disease (defined as stenosis of 50 percent or greater), use of tacking sutures, and continued smoking in the postoperative period. Although it remains important for researchers to thoroughly investigate the natural history of atherosclerosis of the extracranial carotid artery, including those changes that occur after carotid endarterectomy, our results indicate that frequent duplex scanning in the first postoperative year is unnecessary and is not cost-effective. Duplex follow-up studies 1 and 12 months after carotid endarterectomy are sufficient for assessing the problem of recurrent stenosis in the first postoperative year." @default.
• W2022760146 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2022760146 creator A5001761689 @default.
• W2022760146 creator A5020683771 @default.
• W2022760146 creator A5032710770 @default.
• W2022760146 creator A5033518558 @default.
• W2022760146 creator A5047913752 @default.
• W2022760146 creator A5050413268 @default.
• W2022760146 creator A5074945429 @default.
• W2022760146 date "1988-08-01" @default.
• W2022760146 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2022760146 title "Is duplex follow-up cost-effective in the first year after carotid endarterectomy?" @default.
• W2022760146 cites W1966753724 @default.
• W2022760146 cites W1969180328 @default.
• W2022760146 cites W1982739559 @default.
• W2022760146 cites W1984882181 @default.
• W2022760146 cites W1993988726 @default.
• W2022760146 cites W2003203475 @default.
• W2022760146 cites W2003292494 @default.
• W2022760146 cites W2007911452 @default.
• W2022760146 cites W2012867607 @default.
• W2022760146 cites W2012995838 @default.
• W2022760146 cites W2018457901 @default.
• W2022760146 cites W2021809382 @default.
• W2022760146 cites W2022633179 @default.
• W2022760146 cites W2038878918 @default.
• W2022760146 cites W2058052305 @default.
• W2022760146 cites W2087578543 @default.
• W2022760146 cites W2091967369 @default.
• W2022760146 cites W2101215295 @default.
• W2022760146 cites W2114853512 @default.
• W2022760146 cites W2130978946 @default.
• W2022760146 cites W2161790711 @default.
• W2022760146 cites W26633668 @default.
• W2022760146 cites W4212886327 @default.
• W2022760146 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(88)80362-3" @default.
• W2022760146 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3135761" @default.
• W2022760146 hasPublicationYear "1988" @default.
• W2022760146 type Work @default.
• W2022760146 sameAs 2022760146 @default.
• W2022760146 citedByCount "41" @default.
• W2022760146 countsByYear W20227601462012 @default.
• W2022760146 countsByYear W20227601462015 @default.
• W2022760146 countsByYear W20227601462017 @default.
• W2022760146 countsByYear W20227601462018 @default.
• W2022760146 countsByYear W20227601462019 @default.
• W2022760146 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2022760146 hasAuthorship W2022760146A5001761689 @default.
• W2022760146 hasAuthorship W2022760146A5020683771 @default.
• W2022760146 hasAuthorship W2022760146A5032710770 @default.
• W2022760146 hasAuthorship W2022760146A5033518558 @default.
• W2022760146 hasAuthorship W2022760146A5047913752 @default.
• W2022760146 hasAuthorship W2022760146A5050413268 @default.
• W2022760146 hasAuthorship W2022760146A5074945429 @default.
• W2022760146 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2022760146 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2022760146 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2022760146 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2022760146 hasConcept C2779745121 @default.
• W2022760146 hasConcept C2780007028 @default.
• W2022760146 hasConcept C2781038377 @default.
• W2022760146 hasConcept C2781068581 @default.
• W2022760146 hasConcept C2987047532 @default.
• W2022760146 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2022760146 hasConcept C552990157 @default.
• W2022760146 hasConcept C61511704 @default.
• W2022760146 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2022760146 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2022760146 hasConcept C99611785 @default.
• W2022760146 hasConceptScore W2022760146C120665830 @default.
• W2022760146 hasConceptScore W2022760146C121332964 @default.
• W2022760146 hasConceptScore W2022760146C126838900 @default.
• W2022760146 hasConceptScore W2022760146C141071460 @default.
• W2022760146 hasConceptScore W2022760146C2779745121 @default.
• W2022760146 hasConceptScore W2022760146C2780007028 @default.
• W2022760146 hasConceptScore W2022760146C2781038377 @default.
• W2022760146 hasConceptScore W2022760146C2781068581 @default.
• W2022760146 hasConceptScore W2022760146C2987047532 @default.
• W2022760146 hasConceptScore W2022760146C54355233 @default.
• W2022760146 hasConceptScore W2022760146C552990157 @default.
• W2022760146 hasConceptScore W2022760146C61511704 @default.
• W2022760146 hasConceptScore W2022760146C71924100 @default.
• W2022760146 hasConceptScore W2022760146C86803240 @default.
• W2022760146 hasConceptScore W2022760146C99611785 @default.
• W2022760146 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2022760146 hasLocation W20227601461 @default.
• W2022760146 hasLocation W20227601462 @default.
• W2022760146 hasOpenAccess W2022760146 @default.
• W2022760146 hasPrimaryLocation W20227601461 @default.
• W2022760146 hasRelatedWork W1971465377 @default.
• W2022760146 hasRelatedWork W1982807637 @default.
• W2022760146 hasRelatedWork W1999806939 @default.
• W2022760146 hasRelatedWork W2036284535 @default.
• W2022760146 hasRelatedWork W2350451929 @default.
• W2022760146 hasRelatedWork W2368216885 @default.
• W2022760146 hasRelatedWork W2400401331 @default.
• W2022760146 hasRelatedWork W2405789047 @default.
• W2022760146 hasRelatedWork W27297846 @default.

• next