FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2022778302> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2022778302 abstract "The combined spinal and epidural (CSE) technique can reduce or eliminate some of the disadvantages of spinal and epidural anesthesia, while still preserving their advantages. CSE anesthesia is now commonly performed with a single-segment needle-through-needle technique; however, this technique involves some controversies about needle handling and the risk of catheter migration. To avoid some of these potential problems, special CSE sets have been produced. In the present study, 2 of these sets were compared with the traditional double-segment technique.Ninety patients undergoing orthopedic surgery of the lower extremity were randomly allocated into 3 groups of equal size: Group 1, CSE set with an interlocking device between the spinal and epidural needle; group 2, CSE set with a backeye at the epidural needle curve for the passage of the spinal needle; group 3, double-segment technique. All epidural needles were 18-gauge, and spinal needles were 27-gauge with a pencil-point tip. In groups 1 and 2, the puncture was performed at the L3-4 interspace, and in group 3 the epidural catheter was first inserted at the L2-3 interspace followed by spinal puncture one interspace lower. Hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine, 2 mL, was used for the spinal block, and 4 mL of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine through the epidural catheter was used as a test dose. The block performance characteristics were recorded, and the level of analgesia was studied in a blinded fashion. Postoperatively, a bolus of epidural morphine 2 to 4 mg was used for the control of postoperative pain. All patients were interviewed on the 1st and the 7th postoperative days. Afterwards, the needles and catheters were examined by microscopy.The frequency of the successful CSE block was higher in groups 3 (100%) and 2 (90%) than in group 1 (63%) (P <.05). The mean duration of successful block performance, as well as the median level of analgesia, were similar in all the groups. One case of epidural catheter migration intrathecally was observed (group 1). Postoperative nausea and vomiting occurred in 23% of patients, and the incidence of postdural puncture headache was 2.2%. The incidence of backache at the puncture site was similar in the groups. Microscopy showed 6 distorted spinal needle tips (all in group 1), but no material damage to the epidural catheters.The use of the CSE sets does not seem to save time compared with the double-segment technique. Technical problems, unsuccessful CSE block, and damaged spinal needle tip were noted relatively often with the interlocking CSE set. Anesthetic characteristics in the successful blocks were similar with the different techniques." @default.
• W2022778302 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2022778302 creator A5014462657 @default.
• W2022778302 creator A5070115760 @default.
• W2022778302 creator A5075654142 @default.
• W2022778302 date "2001-01-01" @default.
• W2022778302 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2022778302 title "Comparison of technical and block characteristics of different combined spinal and epidural anesthesia techniques" @default.
• W2022778302 cites W1547510481 @default.
• W2022778302 cites W1548076504 @default.
• W2022778302 cites W1979570490 @default.
• W2022778302 cites W1997027655 @default.
• W2022778302 cites W2014506989 @default.
• W2022778302 cites W2018174239 @default.
• W2022778302 cites W2035384083 @default.
• W2022778302 cites W2043715645 @default.
• W2022778302 cites W2053195815 @default.
• W2022778302 cites W2074754548 @default.
• W2022778302 cites W2083211388 @default.
• W2022778302 cites W2087771090 @default.
• W2022778302 cites W2088216037 @default.
• W2022778302 cites W2090938354 @default.
• W2022778302 cites W2129486017 @default.
• W2022778302 cites W2140126632 @default.
• W2022778302 cites W2162200588 @default.
• W2022778302 cites W2164429067 @default.
• W2022778302 cites W2335933872 @default.
• W2022778302 cites W2404969887 @default.
• W2022778302 cites W2954683724 @default.
• W2022778302 cites W1973105573 @default.
• W2022778302 doi "https://doi.org/10.1053/rapm.2001.19413" @default.
• W2022778302 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11172506" @default.
• W2022778302 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
• W2022778302 type Work @default.
• W2022778302 sameAs 2022778302 @default.
• W2022778302 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W2022778302 countsByYear W20227783022012 @default.
• W2022778302 countsByYear W20227783022013 @default.
• W2022778302 countsByYear W20227783022017 @default.
• W2022778302 countsByYear W20227783022019 @default.
• W2022778302 countsByYear W20227783022022 @default.
• W2022778302 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2022778302 hasAuthorship W2022778302A5014462657 @default.
• W2022778302 hasAuthorship W2022778302A5070115760 @default.
• W2022778302 hasAuthorship W2022778302A5075654142 @default.
• W2022778302 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2022778302 hasConcept C2777439173 @default.
• W2022778302 hasConcept C2780149897 @default.
• W2022778302 hasConcept C2781267111 @default.
• W2022778302 hasConcept C2781328992 @default.
• W2022778302 hasConcept C2992886682 @default.
• W2022778302 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2022778302 hasConcept C43376680 @default.
• W2022778302 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2022778302 hasConceptScore W2022778302C141071460 @default.
• W2022778302 hasConceptScore W2022778302C2777439173 @default.
• W2022778302 hasConceptScore W2022778302C2780149897 @default.
• W2022778302 hasConceptScore W2022778302C2781267111 @default.
• W2022778302 hasConceptScore W2022778302C2781328992 @default.
• W2022778302 hasConceptScore W2022778302C2992886682 @default.
• W2022778302 hasConceptScore W2022778302C42219234 @default.
• W2022778302 hasConceptScore W2022778302C43376680 @default.
• W2022778302 hasConceptScore W2022778302C71924100 @default.
• W2022778302 hasLocation W20227783021 @default.
• W2022778302 hasLocation W20227783022 @default.
• W2022778302 hasOpenAccess W2022778302 @default.
• W2022778302 hasPrimaryLocation W20227783021 @default.
• W2022778302 hasRelatedWork W1971982248 @default.
• W2022778302 hasRelatedWork W1973467797 @default.
• W2022778302 hasRelatedWork W1974424508 @default.
• W2022778302 hasRelatedWork W2028362996 @default.
• W2022778302 hasRelatedWork W2039469015 @default.
• W2022778302 hasRelatedWork W2043715645 @default.
• W2022778302 hasRelatedWork W2053195815 @default.
• W2022778302 hasRelatedWork W2083211388 @default.
• W2022778302 hasRelatedWork W2088739778 @default.
• W2022778302 hasRelatedWork W2120213124 @default.
• W2022778302 hasRelatedWork W2142721010 @default.
• W2022778302 hasRelatedWork W2155133611 @default.
• W2022778302 hasRelatedWork W2280006274 @default.
• W2022778302 hasRelatedWork W2353172072 @default.
• W2022778302 hasRelatedWork W2372650098 @default.
• W2022778302 hasRelatedWork W2381292838 @default.
• W2022778302 hasRelatedWork W2463141564 @default.
• W2022778302 hasRelatedWork W3031093807 @default.
• W2022778302 hasRelatedWork W3095383495 @default.
• W2022778302 hasRelatedWork W1973105573 @default.
• W2022778302 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2022778302 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2022778302 magId "2022778302" @default.
• W2022778302 workType "article" @default.