FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2022803427> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2022803427 endingPage "e562" @default.
• W2022803427 startingPage "e557" @default.
• W2022803427 abstract "PurposeTo determine whether dose-guided radiotherapy (i.e., online recalculation and evaluation of the actual dose distribution) can improve decision making for lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.Methods and MaterialsFor this study 108 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of 10 non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy were analyzed retrospectively. The treatment plans were recalculated on the CBCT scans. The V100% of the internal target volume (ITV) and Dmax of the organs at risk (OARs) were analyzed. Results from the recalculated data were compared with dose estimates for target and OARs by superposition of the originally planned dose distribution on CBCT geometry (i.e., the original dose distribution was assumed to be spatially invariant).ResultsBefore position correction was applied the V100% of the ITV was 100% in 65% of the cases when an ITV–PTV margin of 5 mm was used and 52% of the cases when a margin of 3 mm was used. After position correction, the difference of Dmax in the OARs with respect to the treatment plan was within 5% in the majority of the cases. When the dose was not recalculated but estimated assuming an invariant dose distribution, clinically relevant errors occurred in both the ITV and the OARs.ConclusionDose-guided radiotherapy can be used to determine the actual dose in OARs when the target has moved with respect to the OARs. When the workflow is optimized for speed, it can be used to prevent unnecessary position corrections. Estimating the dose by assuming an invariant dose instead of recalculation of the dose gives clinically relevant errors. To determine whether dose-guided radiotherapy (i.e., online recalculation and evaluation of the actual dose distribution) can improve decision making for lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy. For this study 108 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of 10 non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy were analyzed retrospectively. The treatment plans were recalculated on the CBCT scans. The V100% of the internal target volume (ITV) and Dmax of the organs at risk (OARs) were analyzed. Results from the recalculated data were compared with dose estimates for target and OARs by superposition of the originally planned dose distribution on CBCT geometry (i.e., the original dose distribution was assumed to be spatially invariant). Before position correction was applied the V100% of the ITV was 100% in 65% of the cases when an ITV–PTV margin of 5 mm was used and 52% of the cases when a margin of 3 mm was used. After position correction, the difference of Dmax in the OARs with respect to the treatment plan was within 5% in the majority of the cases. When the dose was not recalculated but estimated assuming an invariant dose distribution, clinically relevant errors occurred in both the ITV and the OARs. Dose-guided radiotherapy can be used to determine the actual dose in OARs when the target has moved with respect to the OARs. When the workflow is optimized for speed, it can be used to prevent unnecessary position corrections. Estimating the dose by assuming an invariant dose instead of recalculation of the dose gives clinically relevant errors." @default.
• W2022803427 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2022803427 creator A5017359529 @default.
• W2022803427 creator A5048318808 @default.
• W2022803427 creator A5053197149 @default.
• W2022803427 creator A5060970719 @default.
• W2022803427 creator A5073552513 @default.
• W2022803427 creator A5076370993 @default.
• W2022803427 date "2012-07-01" @default.
• W2022803427 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2022803427 title "Dose-Guided Radiotherapy: Potential Benefit of Online Dose Recalculation for Stereotactic Lung Irradiation in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer" @default.
• W2022803427 cites W2035262450 @default.
• W2022803427 cites W2045009392 @default.
• W2022803427 cites W2053618524 @default.
• W2022803427 cites W2068175268 @default.
• W2022803427 cites W2070179340 @default.
• W2022803427 cites W2092014242 @default.
• W2022803427 cites W2099104461 @default.
• W2022803427 cites W2112097252 @default.
• W2022803427 cites W2124005644 @default.
• W2022803427 cites W2140057952 @default.
• W2022803427 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.12.055" @default.
• W2022803427 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22632772" @default.
• W2022803427 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2022803427 type Work @default.
• W2022803427 sameAs 2022803427 @default.
• W2022803427 citedByCount "13" @default.
• W2022803427 countsByYear W20228034272013 @default.
• W2022803427 countsByYear W20228034272014 @default.
• W2022803427 countsByYear W20228034272015 @default.
• W2022803427 countsByYear W20228034272016 @default.
• W2022803427 countsByYear W20228034272017 @default.
• W2022803427 countsByYear W20228034272018 @default.
• W2022803427 countsByYear W20228034272019 @default.
• W2022803427 countsByYear W20228034272021 @default.
• W2022803427 countsByYear W20228034272023 @default.
• W2022803427 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2022803427 hasAuthorship W2022803427A5017359529 @default.
• W2022803427 hasAuthorship W2022803427A5048318808 @default.
• W2022803427 hasAuthorship W2022803427A5053197149 @default.
• W2022803427 hasAuthorship W2022803427A5060970719 @default.
• W2022803427 hasAuthorship W2022803427A5073552513 @default.
• W2022803427 hasAuthorship W2022803427A5076370993 @default.
• W2022803427 hasBestOaLocation W20228034271 @default.
• W2022803427 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2022803427 hasConcept C143998085 @default.
• W2022803427 hasConcept C181401712 @default.
• W2022803427 hasConcept C201645570 @default.
• W2022803427 hasConcept C2776256026 @default.
• W2022803427 hasConcept C2780387249 @default.
• W2022803427 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2022803427 hasConcept C2992393070 @default.
• W2022803427 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W2022803427 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2022803427 hasConceptScore W2022803427C126838900 @default.
• W2022803427 hasConceptScore W2022803427C143998085 @default.
• W2022803427 hasConceptScore W2022803427C181401712 @default.
• W2022803427 hasConceptScore W2022803427C201645570 @default.
• W2022803427 hasConceptScore W2022803427C2776256026 @default.
• W2022803427 hasConceptScore W2022803427C2780387249 @default.
• W2022803427 hasConceptScore W2022803427C2989005 @default.
• W2022803427 hasConceptScore W2022803427C2992393070 @default.
• W2022803427 hasConceptScore W2022803427C509974204 @default.
• W2022803427 hasConceptScore W2022803427C71924100 @default.
• W2022803427 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2022803427 hasLocation W20228034271 @default.
• W2022803427 hasLocation W20228034272 @default.
• W2022803427 hasOpenAccess W2022803427 @default.
• W2022803427 hasPrimaryLocation W20228034271 @default.
• W2022803427 hasRelatedWork W1546924549 @default.
• W2022803427 hasRelatedWork W1980114307 @default.
• W2022803427 hasRelatedWork W2038518476 @default.
• W2022803427 hasRelatedWork W2081882273 @default.
• W2022803427 hasRelatedWork W2354985064 @default.
• W2022803427 hasRelatedWork W2355353733 @default.
• W2022803427 hasRelatedWork W2360540538 @default.
• W2022803427 hasRelatedWork W2977267586 @default.
• W2022803427 hasRelatedWork W2985346758 @default.
• W2022803427 hasRelatedWork W3196586676 @default.
• W2022803427 hasVolume "83" @default.
• W2022803427 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2022803427 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2022803427 magId "2022803427" @default.
• W2022803427 workType "article" @default.