FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2022852409> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2022852409 endingPage "162" @default.
• W2022852409 startingPage "154" @default.
• W2022852409 abstract "Background: The complex interactions between capsuloligamentous structures and muscle-recruitment strategies that maintain glenohumeral stability remain unclear. The purposes of the present study were to determine whether stiffness regulation and muscle-activation strategies differed under varying joint positions and levels of contraction in the shoulder and to determine the relationship between generalized joint laxity, glenohumeral joint laxity, and joint stiffness. Methods: Forty healthy, physically active subjects with a mean age (and standard deviation) of 25.2 ± 4.6 years, a mean height of 174.7 ± 6.7 cm, and a mean mass of 73.1 ± 13.8 kg were tested. Shoulder stiffness and the activation of muscles (including the rotator cuff and the anterior deltoid) were measured at two levels of internal rotation torque (0% and 50% of maximum) and two joint positions (0° and 90% of maximum external rotation) before and after a 5° external rotation perturbation. Generalized laxity and glenohumeral joint laxity (in the anterior, posterior, and inferior directions) were also assessed. Results: Stiffness was 77% greater at 50% of maximum internal rotation torque than at 0% of maximum internal rotation torque (p < 0.001) but was not significantly different between joint positions (p = 0.73). From 0% to 50% of maximum internal rotation torque, preparatory and reactive recruitment of the subscapularis increased significantly more (p < 0.05) than those of the other muscles. Also, subscapularis preparatory activity was 36% greater in 0° of external rotation than in 90% of maximum external rotation (p < 0.01). Generalized joint laxity (as indicated by a score of ≥4) was present in 20% of the subjects. Glenohumeral joint laxity (as indicated by a grade of ≥2) was present in the anterior, posterior, and inferior directions in 13%, 15%, and 15% of the subjects, respectively. No correlation existed between passive stiffness and generalized or glenohumeral laxity (r = −0.12 to 0.29; p = 0.08 to 0.48). Conclusions: Moderate levels of muscle contraction can significantly increase glenohumeral joint stiffness and stability. Preactivation of the subscapularis appears to be the primary dynamic stabilizer with the arm in 0° of external rotation. However, with the arm in 90% of maximum external rotation (the apprehension position), less subscapularis activity is observed and the maintenance of stability may shift toward other musculoskeletal structures because joint stiffness does not change. A relationship between generalized joint laxity, glenohumeral laxity, and stiffness was not observed in healthy subjects. Clinical Relevance: Clinically, healthy populations have comparable levels of stiffness, or joint stability, in 0° of external rotation and in 90% of maximum external rotation (the apprehension position)." @default.
• W2022852409 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2022852409 creator A5000319573 @default.
• W2022852409 creator A5018358208 @default.
• W2022852409 creator A5020127435 @default.
• W2022852409 creator A5023056515 @default.
• W2022852409 creator A5028762315 @default.
• W2022852409 creator A5047274114 @default.
• W2022852409 creator A5087793825 @default.
• W2022852409 date "2008-01-01" @default.
• W2022852409 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W2022852409 title "Stiffness Regulation and Muscle-Recruitment Strategies of the Shoulder in Response to External Rotation Perturbations" @default.
• W2022852409 cites W1625214970 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W1939466653 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W1974203100 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W1981616116 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W1996435658 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W2023159346 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W2028849972 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W2029267795 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W2031377894 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W2034460139 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W2043618560 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W2044872558 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W2049326159 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W2054441168 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W2059893164 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W2068467210 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W2073551639 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W2082320890 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W2091663092 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W2094245838 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W2110187045 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W2121068703 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W2122327920 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W2125657905 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W2129677523 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W2132887428 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W2132936295 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W2140293652 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W2167023916 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W2181865144 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W2282958165 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W2283975627 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W2289557621 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W2887110489 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W362700057 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W4312861508 @default.
• W2022852409 cites W95328011 @default.
• W2022852409 doi "https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.f.01133" @default.
• W2022852409 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18171970" @default.
• W2022852409 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2022852409 type Work @default.
• W2022852409 sameAs 2022852409 @default.
• W2022852409 citedByCount "26" @default.
• W2022852409 countsByYear W20228524092012 @default.
• W2022852409 countsByYear W20228524092013 @default.
• W2022852409 countsByYear W20228524092014 @default.
• W2022852409 countsByYear W20228524092015 @default.
• W2022852409 countsByYear W20228524092016 @default.
• W2022852409 countsByYear W20228524092019 @default.
• W2022852409 countsByYear W20228524092020 @default.
• W2022852409 countsByYear W20228524092021 @default.
• W2022852409 countsByYear W20228524092022 @default.
• W2022852409 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2022852409 hasAuthorship W2022852409A5000319573 @default.
• W2022852409 hasAuthorship W2022852409A5018358208 @default.
• W2022852409 hasAuthorship W2022852409A5020127435 @default.
• W2022852409 hasAuthorship W2022852409A5023056515 @default.
• W2022852409 hasAuthorship W2022852409A5028762315 @default.
• W2022852409 hasAuthorship W2022852409A5047274114 @default.
• W2022852409 hasAuthorship W2022852409A5087793825 @default.
• W2022852409 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W2022852409 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2022852409 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2022852409 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2022852409 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2022852409 hasConcept C144171764 @default.
• W2022852409 hasConcept C170700871 @default.
• W2022852409 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2022852409 hasConcept C2776511800 @default.
• W2022852409 hasConcept C2778565105 @default.
• W2022852409 hasConcept C2779372316 @default.
• W2022852409 hasConcept C2781415944 @default.
• W2022852409 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2022852409 hasConcept C2994254730 @default.
• W2022852409 hasConcept C3019755574 @default.
• W2022852409 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2022852409 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2022852409 hasConcept C97355855 @default.
• W2022852409 hasConceptScore W2022852409C105702510 @default.
• W2022852409 hasConceptScore W2022852409C121332964 @default.
• W2022852409 hasConceptScore W2022852409C127413603 @default.
• W2022852409 hasConceptScore W2022852409C141071460 @default.
• W2022852409 hasConceptScore W2022852409C142724271 @default.
• W2022852409 hasConceptScore W2022852409C144171764 @default.
• W2022852409 hasConceptScore W2022852409C170700871 @default.
• W2022852409 hasConceptScore W2022852409C204787440 @default.

• next