FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2022854885> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2022854885 abstract "To compare two methods of applying rubber rings to the pedicles of yearling stags to induce analgesia in the antler prior to removal. To compare the application of a rubber ring with that of a lignocaine ring block of the antler pedicle on the efficacy and time course of the analgesia produced in yearling stags.Rubber rings were applied to the pedicles of 36 yearling stags that required velvet antler removal. The standard method, a doubled-over ring expanded and lowered down from the distal end of the antler and released midway down the pedicle, was compared with a cable-tie method on the other pedicle, where a ring was pulled around the pedicle by an electrical cable tie threaded through the ring. Brief electrical stimulation (train-of-four mode) was applied proximal and distal to the ring before, and at regular intervals for 1 hour after, application of the ring to a level that produced an auriculopalpebral reflex response. In a second experiment, each pair of antlers per yearling stag (n=36) was allocated to one of three pairs of treatments, viz no treatment (control) and the cable-tie method as described above, control and local anaesthesia (a ring block of 2 ml 2% lignocaine per cm pedicle circumference), or the cable-tie method and local anaesthesia. Electrical stimulation (tetanic mode) was applied to each antler approximately 25 mm distal to the pedicle/antler junction before, and at intervals up to 1 hour after, application of treatments at a level required to produce a head/neck avoidance behavioural response. In a third experiment, the two electrical stimulation protocols used above were directly compared by measuring the response of stags (n=8) to one protocol on each pedicle/antler prior to, and at intervals for 1 hour after, application of a rubber ring. At the end of each treatment in all three experiments, analgesia of the antler was established as a nil behavioural response of the stag to a saw cut to the antler (the 'nick test').For both methods of application of a ring the minimum electrical stimulation required distal to the ring to elicit a reflex response increased from around 16 to 55 mA by 60 minutes. In contrast, the electrical stimulation required proximal to the ring remained low (approximately 17.0 mA) throughout. No stag subjected to either of the methods of application responded to the nick test 60 minutes after application of the ring. The electrical stimulation required to produce a behavioural response increased very rapidly in stags treated with local anaesthetic and at a slower rate in those treated with the cable-tie method but showed no significant increase in control stags. After 4 and 30 minutes, for local anaesthesia and the cable-tie method, respectively, 95% of stags were not responding to 80 mA. A significantly greater proportion of stags with antlers treated with local anaesthetic and the cable-tie method did not respond to the nick test than controls, and there was no significant difference in the frequency of the response between stags with treated antlers. The minimum current required to produce a response proximal to a rubber ring was slightly higher on average for train-of-four electrical stimulus (mean 18.1 (SD 2.6) mA) than for the tetanic mode (mean 11.9 (SD 2.5) mA). The increase in minimum current required to produce the respective response to stimulation distal to the ring was similar for both methods, although the maximum predicted value (67.4 mA) was lower for train-of-four than for the tetanic mode (84.5 mA). No stag responded to the nick test > or = 60 minutes after application of the ring.The cable-tie method was no different from the standard method as a procedure for producing analgesia in the antlers of yearling stags and should be accepted as an appropriate procedure for applying analgesic rings to yearling stags. The analgesia produced in the antlers of yearling stags by rubber rings applied by the cable-tie method to the pedicle was similar to that of a lignocaine ring block, but the time course for the development of analgesia was markedly different. Given that a lignocaine ring block is accepted as an adequate method of pain relief for antler removal, the application of rubber rings followed by a period of > or = 30 minutes after application can be advocated as a viable alternative for pain relief." @default.
• W2022854885 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2022854885 creator A5006686845 @default.
• W2022854885 creator A5015832299 @default.
• W2022854885 creator A5023123029 @default.
• W2022854885 creator A5044625287 @default.
• W2022854885 creator A5056513271 @default.
• W2022854885 date "2009-06-01" @default.
• W2022854885 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2022854885 title "Assessment of the production of analgesia induced by application of a rubber ring or local anaesthetic to the antler pedicle of yearling stags" @default.
• W2022854885 cites W1970694334 @default.
• W2022854885 cites W1976481697 @default.
• W2022854885 cites W1977978464 @default.
• W2022854885 cites W1987032846 @default.
• W2022854885 cites W2030637608 @default.
• W2022854885 cites W2045283721 @default.
• W2022854885 cites W2046378283 @default.
• W2022854885 cites W2083553245 @default.
• W2022854885 cites W2085220296 @default.
• W2022854885 cites W2118552144 @default.
• W2022854885 cites W1982445652 @default.
• W2022854885 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2009.36895" @default.
• W2022854885 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19521464" @default.
• W2022854885 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2022854885 type Work @default.
• W2022854885 sameAs 2022854885 @default.
• W2022854885 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2022854885 countsByYear W20228548852019 @default.
• W2022854885 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2022854885 hasAuthorship W2022854885A5006686845 @default.
• W2022854885 hasAuthorship W2022854885A5015832299 @default.
• W2022854885 hasAuthorship W2022854885A5023123029 @default.
• W2022854885 hasAuthorship W2022854885A5044625287 @default.
• W2022854885 hasAuthorship W2022854885A5056513271 @default.
• W2022854885 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W2022854885 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
• W2022854885 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2022854885 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2022854885 hasConcept C2777361732 @default.
• W2022854885 hasConcept C2780378348 @default.
• W2022854885 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2022854885 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2022854885 hasConceptScore W2022854885C105702510 @default.
• W2022854885 hasConceptScore W2022854885C178790620 @default.
• W2022854885 hasConceptScore W2022854885C185592680 @default.
• W2022854885 hasConceptScore W2022854885C18903297 @default.
• W2022854885 hasConceptScore W2022854885C2777361732 @default.
• W2022854885 hasConceptScore W2022854885C2780378348 @default.
• W2022854885 hasConceptScore W2022854885C71924100 @default.
• W2022854885 hasConceptScore W2022854885C86803240 @default.
• W2022854885 hasLocation W20228548851 @default.
• W2022854885 hasLocation W20228548852 @default.
• W2022854885 hasOpenAccess W2022854885 @default.
• W2022854885 hasPrimaryLocation W20228548851 @default.
• W2022854885 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2022854885 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2022854885 magId "2022854885" @default.
• W2022854885 workType "article" @default.